National-Level Players Enter the Game: Deciphering the Escalation and Transformation of Crypto Crime in 2025

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-12Last updated on 2026-01-12

Abstract

In 2025, state-level involvement in cryptocurrency-related activities has significantly increased, marking a new phase in the maturation of illicit on-chain ecosystems. Illicit addresses received at least $154 billion, a 162% year-over-year surge, largely driven by a 694% increase in transactions involving sanctioned entities. Even excluding these, 2025 was a record year for crypto crime, with growth across most illegal categories. Stablecoins now dominate illicit transactions, accounting for 84% of the total. Nation-state threats were particularly prominent: North Korean hackers stole $2 billion, including a historic $1.5 billion attack on Bybit. Russia launched the ruble-backed A7A5 token, which saw $93.3 billion in transactions within a year, facilitating large-scale sanctions evasion. Iranian proxy networks and China-based money laundering networks also expanded their operations, offering specialized services like fraud, terror financing, and sanctions avoidance. The rise of full-stack illicit infrastructure providers has enabled both criminals and state actors to conduct malicious activities more effectively. Moreover, the connection between crypto crime and real-world violence is growing, with increased use in human trafficking and violent coercion attacks. Despite these challenges, illicit activity still represents less than 1% of all traceable cryptocurrency transaction volume. Collaboration among law enforcement, regulators, and crypto businesses remains crucial t...

Authored by: Chainalysis

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

In 2025, we observed a significant increase in state-level cryptocurrency-related activities, marking a new mature phase in the development of the illegal on-chain ecosystem. Over the past few years, the professionalization within the crypto crime sphere has deepened; illicit organizations have established large-scale on-chain infrastructure to support transnational criminal networks in procuring goods and services and laundering crypto crime proceeds. Against this backdrop, national governments have also begun to engage in this domain, leveraging these mature professional service providers on one hand, and building their own customized infrastructure on the other, to evade sanctions on a large scale. As governments tap into this illicit cryptocurrency supply chain originally built for cybercriminals and organized crime groups, government agencies, compliance, and security teams now face severe challenges in terms of consumer protection and national security.

What are the specific on-chain manifestations of these developments and other industry changes? Next, we will analyze them by combining data and macro trends.

According to our monitoring data, the scale of funds flowing into illicit cryptocurrency addresses in 2025 reached at least $154 billion, a sharp increase of 162% year-on-year. This growth was primarily driven by a surge in fund inflows to sanctioned entities, which soared by 694% year-on-year. However, even excluding the growth from sanctioned entities, 2025 still stands as a record year for crypto crime, as the vast majority of illicit activity categories saw growth.

Nevertheless, the scale of these illicit transactions still pales in comparison to the overall cryptocurrency economy, where legitimate transactions remain the mainstay. We estimate that although the proportion of illicit transactions in the total traceable cryptocurrency transaction volume in 2025 increased slightly compared to 2024, it remained below 1%.

As shown in the figure below, we also observed a continuing shift in the types of assets involved in crypto crime.

Over the past few years, stablecoins have gradually become the dominant asset for illicit transactions, currently accounting for 84% of the total illicit transaction volume. This trend aligns with the overall development characteristics of the cryptocurrency ecosystem: with advantages such as convenience for cross-border transfers, low volatility, and wide application scenarios, the share of stablecoins in the entire cryptocurrency transaction volume continues to expand.

The following sections will delve into the core trends that defined the crypto crime landscape in 2025, trends that will remain important to watch in the future.

National-Level Threats Drive Transaction Volume: North Korean Thefts Hit Record High, Russian A7A5 Token Facilitates Large-Scale Sanction Evasion

In 2025, stolen funds remained a major threat to the cryptocurrency ecosystem, with North Korean-linked hacker groups alone stealing $2 billion. This figure was primarily driven by several highly destructive large-scale hacking incidents, the most notable being the attack on the Bybit exchange in February. The incident involved nearly $1.5 billion, making it the largest digital asset theft in the history of cryptocurrency. Although North Korean hackers have long been a major force threatening the cryptocurrency ecosystem, the past year saw record highs both in the amount stolen and in the sophistication of their intrusion and money laundering methods.

Particularly noteworthy is that the scale of on-chain activities by national governments reached unprecedented levels in 2025. Russia introduced relevant legislation in 2024 to promote the use of cryptocurrency to evade sanctions, and this measure was formally implemented in February 2025. The country launched the ruble-backed token A7A5, which saw its transaction volume exceed $93.3 billion in less than a year since its launch.

Meanwhile, over the past few years, Iran's proxy networks have conducted money laundering, illegal oil trading, and procurement of weapons and bulk commodities on-chain through identifiable wallet addresses already on sanctions lists, with a cumulative transaction volume exceeding $2 billion. Despite multiple military strikes, Iran-backed terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis continue to use cryptocurrency on an unprecedented scale.

In 2025, Chinese money laundering networks emerged as a dominant force in the illicit on-chain ecosystem. These organizations operate with sophisticated models, significantly driving the diversification and professionalization of crypto crime, offering specialized criminal services including "money laundering services." Building on early illegal operation models like "Huiyin Guarantee," these networks have established full-service criminal enterprises, covering areas such as fraud, scams, laundering proceeds from North Korean hacker thefts, sanction evasion, and terrorism financing.

Full-Stack Illicit Infrastructure Providers Fuel Malicious Cyber Activities

While national governments are increasing their use of cryptocurrency, traditional cybercrime remains rampant: ransomware operators, child sexual abuse and cybercrime platforms, malware distributors, scammers, and illicit marketplaces still rely on vast support networks to maintain operations. Illicit actors and national governments are increasingly dependent on full-stack on-chain infrastructure providers, including domain registrars, secure and reliable hosting services, and other technical infrastructure that can be used for malicious cyber activities.

These infrastructure providers have evolved into comprehensive infrastructure platforms capable of resisting platform takedowns, abuse complaints, and sanction enforcement. As the scale of these services continues to expand, they are likely to become a key force driving economic crime and state-backed entities to broaden the scope of their malicious cyber activities.

Growing Correlation Between Cryptocurrency and Violent Crime

In the perception of many, crypto crime is still confined to the virtual world. The masterminds are merely anonymous figures hiding behind keyboards, not translating into real-world threats. But in reality, the link between on-chain activities and violent crime is deepening. Human trafficking rings are increasingly using cryptocurrency for transactions; at the same time, disturbingly, there has been a significant rise in cases of violent coercion attacks, where criminals use violence to force victims to transfer crypto assets, and such assaults often occur during peak cryptocurrency price periods.

Looking ahead, collaboration between law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and cryptocurrency companies will be key to addressing these complex, evolving, and interconnected threats. Although the proportion of illicit transactions within legitimate cryptocurrency trading volume remains limited, maintaining the integrity and security of the cryptocurrency ecosystem has never been more important.

Related Questions

QWhat was the total value of illicit cryptocurrency transactions in 2025, and what was the primary driver of this growth?

AThe total value of illicit cryptocurrency transactions in 2025 reached at least $154 billion, a 162% year-over-year increase. This growth was primarily driven by a massive 694% surge in transaction volume from sanctioned entities.

QWhich asset type has become the dominant medium for illicit transactions and what percentage of the total illicit volume does it represent?

AStablecoins have become the dominant asset for illicit transactions, representing 84% of the total illicit transaction volume.

QWhat significant role did nation-states play in the 2025 crypto crime landscape, according to the article?

ANation-states played a significant role, with activities reaching unprecedented levels. This included North Korean hackers stealing a record $2 billion, Russia launching the A7A5 token to facilitate large-scale sanctions evasion (with nearly $93.3 billion in volume), and Iran's proxy networks laundering over $2 billion for activities like illegal oil trading and weapons procurement.

QWhat new concerning trend is emerging regarding the connection between cryptocurrency and real-world violence?

AA concerning trend is the increasing connection between on-chain activity and violent crime. This includes human trafficking syndicates using crypto for transactions and a significant rise in violent coercion attacks, where victims are physically forced to transfer crypto assets, often during periods of peak cryptocurrency prices.

QWhat is the role of 'full-stack illicit infrastructure providers' in the current crypto crime ecosystem?

AFull-stack illicit infrastructure providers offer comprehensive services to both criminals and nation-states. They have evolved into resilient platforms that can withstand takedowns, abuse complaints, and sanctions enforcement. Their services include domain registration, secure hosting, and other technical infrastructure for malicious cyber activity, making them a critical force in enabling economic crime and state-sponsored operations.

Related Reads

The Turning Point of the AI Bull Market: Leverage Blow-ups, Overcapacity in Compute, Why This Macro Analyst is Fully Bearish

AI Bull Market Reaches Inflection Point: Analyst Turns Bearish Due to Leverage, Chinese Competition, and Overcapacity Fidenza Macro analyst Geo Chen explains his decision to sell all AI semiconductor and infrastructure holdings in June, offering a comprehensive bearish thesis. He argues the AI-driven bull market has peaked, citing several key factors. First, unsustainable buying pressure: a massive influx of "low-quality" capital from Korean retail investors using highly leveraged ETFs on stocks like SK Hynix created a parabolic, fragile rally. Recent liquidations have wiped out billions and impacted over a million accounts, removing a key market driver. Second, a competitive threat: the rapid rise of powerful, cost-effective open-source AI models from China, such as MoonShot AI's Kimi K3 and Alibaba's Qwen 3.8, is commoditizing intelligence. This undermines the pricing power and high-valuation financing prospects of closed-source leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic, potentially creating a "single point of failure" for the ecosystem. Third, an impending capacity glut: while AI compute and components are currently in shortage, Chen warns this is typical of a cycle top. Massive, committed capex from cloud providers will likely lead to a supply overhang within 1-2 years. Data shows token spending has already peaked and declined since June, while bond spreads for data center companies are widening, signaling rising credit risk. Chen also highlights broader macro headwinds: the protracted Iran conflict acts as a persistent stagflationary force, and the Federal Reserve under Chair Kevin Warsh is losing credibility in its inflation fight. Long-term Treasury yields breaking above 5.2% present a new challenge for equities. In summary, Chen believes the convergence of speculative excesses, competitive disruption, looming overcapacity, and adverse macroeconomic conditions marks a significant turning point for the AI investment theme.

marsbit12m ago

The Turning Point of the AI Bull Market: Leverage Blow-ups, Overcapacity in Compute, Why This Macro Analyst is Fully Bearish

marsbit12m ago

Saeed Al-Marri: How Tokenization Unlocks New Opportunities for Shipping Funds

Said Al-Marri: How Tokenization Opens New Opportunities for Shipping Funds For centuries, commercial shipping has been a capital-intensive asset class limited to institutional funds and shipping dynasties. Said bin Saleh Al-Marri, CEO of Ethra Invest and Ethra Ship, aims to break down these barriers by combining Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization with conservative private equity principles. This bridges decentralized finance (DeFi) with the physical realities of global trade. Tokenization allows fractional ownership of ships on a blockchain, giving smaller investors access to previously inaccessible markets. However, Al-Marri warns it is not a regulatory loophole or a cure for asset illiquidity. The core physical risks are isolated in Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) for qualified investors. While tokenization enhances transparency and ownership record-keeping, Al-Marri stresses that a liquid secondary market depends on transparent asset valuation and must not interfere with ship operations managed by professionals. Regarding legal enforcement, smart contracts cannot physically seize a ship. Legal recourse still relies on traditional maritime courts, ship mortgages, and flag state laws, with blockchain records needing to mirror legal ownership in the SPV perfectly. Beyond ownership, the industry faces administrative hurdles like paper-based bills of lading. Al-Marri argues the bottleneck is legal and operational standardization, not technology. He advocates for a hybrid model combining digital trade documents and programmable settlements with support from regulated financial institutions, rather than a full crypto replacement for tools like Letters of Credit. A major challenge is decarbonizing the global fleet by 2050. Transitioning to green fuels requires massive upfront investment. Al-Marri emphasizes a conservative, holistic approach to underwriting these projects, evaluating technology, fuel availability, safety, and resale value. Investments must be justified under conservative forecasts, not just optimistic ones. By combining pragmatic risk management with digital infrastructure, leaders like Al-Marri show that the evolution of maritime finance is about mobilizing capital to build a modernized and sustainable global fleet, not just putting ships on a blockchain.

cryptonews.ru27m ago

Saeed Al-Marri: How Tokenization Unlocks New Opportunities for Shipping Funds

cryptonews.ru27m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片