MYX slides 18% while OI climbs to $25M – Is a squeeze brewing?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

MYX Finance (MYX) has declined 18% amid weak fundamentals and revenue struggles. Perpetual futures activity is driving the downturn, with a negative funding rate of -1.0858% indicating dominant short positioning. However, Open Interest increased by 1% to $25 million, suggesting capital remains in the market rather than fleeing. Exchange-level data shows a divergence: while the overall market is bearish, platforms like Bybit show a majority of long positions. Spot markets also saw $224,000 in net inflows, indicating selective accumulation. Liquidity clusters above the current price may act as short-term magnets for an upward move, creating potential for near-term upside volatility despite the broader bearish trend.

MYX Finance [MYX] faces a deteriorating price outlook as the asset extends its losses. The weakness in price aligns with soft fundamentals, as the protocol struggles to generate sufficient revenue to cover operational costs.

In the near term, derivatives activity is driving market direction. Positioning across perpetual markets, whether dominated by longs or shorts, is shaping MYX’s short-term price trajectory.

Funding Rates signal short dominance

Perpetual futures activity has reinforced downside pressure. Over the past 24 hours, MYX declined 18%, at press time, with momentum accelerating during the move.

At the same time, CoinGlass data showed that the Funding Rate dropped to -1.0858%. A negative rate indicates that short positions are paying longs, reflecting a market skewed toward bearish positioning. Current price action confirms that sellers are exerting control.

Notably, the negative Funding Rate has not triggered capital flight. Open Interest (OI) rose by 1%, adding approximately $250,000 and bringing total outstanding positions to roughly $25 million.

Typically, sharp negative funding coincides with declining OI as traders unwind exposure. In this case, capital remains in the market, suggesting active participation rather than broad liquidation.

Exchange-level divergence in positioning

Despite short dominance at the aggregate level, exchange-specific data reveal divergence.

Long/Short Ratios across Binance, Bybit, KuCoin, and BingX show higher long participation. Bybit leads, with 51% of total perpetual volume attributed to long positions.

Bybit’s positioning carries added weight, given its substantial share of MYX’s Open Interest and trading volume. This divergence suggests that while overall funding skews negative, certain trader cohorts are positioning for a potential rebound.

Spot market flows show signs of selective accumulation. In the past 24 hours, MYX recorded about $224,000 in net capital inflows. Compared to its typical daily buy activity, this marks a notable uptick in demand.

Liquidity clusters define near-term structure

The liquidation heatmap highlights significant liquidity clusters above the current price. Such concentrations often act as short-term magnets, as price tends to move toward areas with dense leveraged positions.

The presence of larger clusters overhead increases the probability of a liquidity-driven upside move. Downside liquidity remains visible below current levels, though the depth is comparatively smaller than the upside clusters.

As a result, while the broader trend remains bearish, the current liquidity structure leaves room for short-term upside volatility driven by derivatives positioning and liquidation dynamics.


Final Thoughts

  • Short sellers account for a significant share of liquidity in the derivatives market.
  • Traders on Bybit, CoinEx, and BingX are increasing long exposure despite elevated downside risk.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price performance of MYX Finance and by how much has it declined?

AMYX has declined by 18% in the past 24 hours, with the momentum of the drop accelerating.

QWhat does the negative Funding Rate of -1.0858% indicate about market sentiment for MYX?

AThe negative Funding Rate indicates that short positions are paying longs, reflecting a market that is skewed toward bearish (short) positioning and that sellers are in control.

QDespite the negative funding, what happened to Open Interest (OI) and what does this suggest?

AOpen Interest (OI) actually rose by 1%, adding approximately $250,000 to bring the total to $25 million. This suggests capital is remaining in the market for active participation rather than traders broadly liquidating and closing their positions.

QWhich exchange shows a majority of long positions for MYX perpetual futures, according to the Long/Short Ratios?

ABybit leads with 51% of its total perpetual volume attributed to long positions.

QAccording to the liquidation heatmap, where are the significant liquidity clusters located and what is their likely effect?

ASignificant liquidity clusters are located above the current price. These concentrations often act as short-term magnets, increasing the probability of a liquidity-driven upside move as price tends to gravitate toward areas with dense leveraged positions.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit4h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit4h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit5h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit5h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit5h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit5h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit5h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片