MYX slides 18% while OI climbs to $25M – Is a squeeze brewing?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

MYX Finance (MYX) has declined 18% amid weak fundamentals and revenue struggles. Perpetual futures activity is driving the downturn, with a negative funding rate of -1.0858% indicating dominant short positioning. However, Open Interest increased by 1% to $25 million, suggesting capital remains in the market rather than fleeing. Exchange-level data shows a divergence: while the overall market is bearish, platforms like Bybit show a majority of long positions. Spot markets also saw $224,000 in net inflows, indicating selective accumulation. Liquidity clusters above the current price may act as short-term magnets for an upward move, creating potential for near-term upside volatility despite the broader bearish trend.

MYX Finance [MYX] faces a deteriorating price outlook as the asset extends its losses. The weakness in price aligns with soft fundamentals, as the protocol struggles to generate sufficient revenue to cover operational costs.

In the near term, derivatives activity is driving market direction. Positioning across perpetual markets, whether dominated by longs or shorts, is shaping MYX’s short-term price trajectory.

Funding Rates signal short dominance

Perpetual futures activity has reinforced downside pressure. Over the past 24 hours, MYX declined 18%, at press time, with momentum accelerating during the move.

At the same time, CoinGlass data showed that the Funding Rate dropped to -1.0858%. A negative rate indicates that short positions are paying longs, reflecting a market skewed toward bearish positioning. Current price action confirms that sellers are exerting control.

Notably, the negative Funding Rate has not triggered capital flight. Open Interest (OI) rose by 1%, adding approximately $250,000 and bringing total outstanding positions to roughly $25 million.

Typically, sharp negative funding coincides with declining OI as traders unwind exposure. In this case, capital remains in the market, suggesting active participation rather than broad liquidation.

Exchange-level divergence in positioning

Despite short dominance at the aggregate level, exchange-specific data reveal divergence.

Long/Short Ratios across Binance, Bybit, KuCoin, and BingX show higher long participation. Bybit leads, with 51% of total perpetual volume attributed to long positions.

Bybit’s positioning carries added weight, given its substantial share of MYX’s Open Interest and trading volume. This divergence suggests that while overall funding skews negative, certain trader cohorts are positioning for a potential rebound.

Spot market flows show signs of selective accumulation. In the past 24 hours, MYX recorded about $224,000 in net capital inflows. Compared to its typical daily buy activity, this marks a notable uptick in demand.

Liquidity clusters define near-term structure

The liquidation heatmap highlights significant liquidity clusters above the current price. Such concentrations often act as short-term magnets, as price tends to move toward areas with dense leveraged positions.

The presence of larger clusters overhead increases the probability of a liquidity-driven upside move. Downside liquidity remains visible below current levels, though the depth is comparatively smaller than the upside clusters.

As a result, while the broader trend remains bearish, the current liquidity structure leaves room for short-term upside volatility driven by derivatives positioning and liquidation dynamics.


Final Thoughts

  • Short sellers account for a significant share of liquidity in the derivatives market.
  • Traders on Bybit, CoinEx, and BingX are increasing long exposure despite elevated downside risk.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price performance of MYX Finance and by how much has it declined?

AMYX has declined by 18% in the past 24 hours, with the momentum of the drop accelerating.

QWhat does the negative Funding Rate of -1.0858% indicate about market sentiment for MYX?

AThe negative Funding Rate indicates that short positions are paying longs, reflecting a market that is skewed toward bearish (short) positioning and that sellers are in control.

QDespite the negative funding, what happened to Open Interest (OI) and what does this suggest?

AOpen Interest (OI) actually rose by 1%, adding approximately $250,000 to bring the total to $25 million. This suggests capital is remaining in the market for active participation rather than traders broadly liquidating and closing their positions.

QWhich exchange shows a majority of long positions for MYX perpetual futures, according to the Long/Short Ratios?

ABybit leads with 51% of its total perpetual volume attributed to long positions.

QAccording to the liquidation heatmap, where are the significant liquidity clusters located and what is their likely effect?

ASignificant liquidity clusters are located above the current price. These concentrations often act as short-term magnets, increasing the probability of a liquidity-driven upside move as price tends to gravitate toward areas with dense leveraged positions.

Related Reads

Why Is OpenAI Playing Catch-Up with Claude Code?

In the rapidly evolving field of AI coding assistants, OpenAI, which once led the generative AI wave with ChatGPT, has found itself in the unexpected position of playing catch-up against Anthropic’s Claude Code. Through interviews with OpenAI executives, engineers, and developers, the article reveals that OpenAI’s early lead in AI programming—via its Codex project—was deprioritized as the company shifted resources toward ChatGPT and multimodal models. This strategic shift allowed Anthropic, founded by former OpenAI members, to focus intensely on coding capabilities, leading to the successful launch of Claude Code. OpenAI later reorganized internal teams and accelerated development of its AI programming products, such as the reasoning-based model o1 and later o3. Despite these efforts, Claude Code gained significant traction, especially after integration with tools like Cursor, which OpenAI attempted to acquire unsuccessfully. A proposed acquisition of Windsurf also failed due to tensions with Microsoft, OpenAI’s major partner. By late 2025 and early 2026, OpenAI’s Codex began narrowing the gap, with user growth rising to about 40% of Claude Code’s usage. The competition reflects broader industry trends where AI agents are increasingly automating cognitive work, raising questions about the future of software development and white-collar jobs. Despite progress, concerns around safety and societal impact remain as AI coding tools become more powerful and pervasive.

marsbit9m ago

Why Is OpenAI Playing Catch-Up with Claude Code?

marsbit9m ago

"Marking the Boat to Find the Sword"-Style Price Predictions Go Viral: The Practical Logic and Flaws of Mystical Prophecies

"Carving the Boat to Find the Sword"-style cryptocurrency price predictions, which rely on historical pattern analogies, have gained popularity during uncertain market phases. Analysts like CryptoBullet and KillaXBT use methods such as "tick-tock fractals" and historical rhythm analysis to predict market tops, bottoms, and trends, often claiming accuracy rates of 75–80%. While these predictions sometimes align with actual movements—such as correctly identifying a downturn in January 2026—they often miss precise price levels or timing. The appeal lies in three factors: market cycles often rhyme due to recurring liquidity and sentiment patterns; common technical indicators show similar predictive power but lack visual simplicity; and survivorship bias amplifies the perception of accuracy, as failed predictions are often ignored or deleted. However, these methods are flawed in practice. They offer directional guidance rather than executable trading strategies, lacking precise entry/exit points, stop-loss levels, or clear failure conditions. For instance, predicting a October 2025 top without specific price targets or risk management rules provides little actionable insight. Ultimately, while historical analogies can help identify market phases, they should not be mistaken for reliable trading signals. History rhymes—but never repeats exactly.

marsbit11m ago

"Marking the Boat to Find the Sword"-Style Price Predictions Go Viral: The Practical Logic and Flaws of Mystical Prophecies

marsbit11m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片