Michael Saylor’s ‘Orange Century’ meets skepticism: ‘Leaves much to be desired’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, completed its 100th Bitcoin purchase, acquiring 592 BTC for $39.8 million, bringing its total holdings to 717,722 BTC. Despite this milestone, the achievement is met with skepticism and criticism due to the company's massive unrealized losses, estimated at nearly $7 billion from a total investment of $54.56 billion. Prominent Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff and other investors have questioned the strategy, noting that the price often drops after their purchases and highlighting poor timing. This sentiment is reinforced by Bitcoin's recent price decline to around $63,234 and a significant drop in MicroStrategy's stock value. The article also notes similar substantial unrealized losses at Bitmine with its large Ethereum holdings. Overall, market excitement over large Bitcoin acquisitions has waned, replaced by investor fatigue and concern over enduring the current market downturn.

While most of the crypto world was looking for a way out due to the market crash, Michael Saylor chose to go even deeper.

Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) just made a record by completing its 100th Bitcoin [BTC] purchase. The company bought 592 BTC for about $39.8 million on the 22nd of February.

That pushed its total holdings to a massive 717,722 BTC.

On the surface, that sounds historic. But the mood around this milestone feels different. Strategy has spent about $54.56 billion building its Bitcoin position. With an average purchase price of $76,020 per coin.

This has resulted in the company now registering nearly $7 billion in unrealized losses. Hence, instead of celebration, many investors started criticizing Saylor’s accumulation.

Community reactions spark intrigue

One of the loudest voices came from long-time Bitcoin skeptic Peter Schiff. After the announcement, Schiff argued,

“Congratulations, you finally averaged down. But in case you didn’t notice you are already down over 5% on your last purchase. So as you keep averaging down your overall losses will increase.”

Echoing similar sentiments, another user added,

“There’s a clear irony in Strategy’s accumulation: almost every time they announce a new purchase, the price moves against them. While they claim to be long-term visionaries, their short-term entry points often leave much to be desired from a timing perspective.”

Interestingly, the accumulation followed Syalor’s recent tease on “Orange Century.” Unexpectedly, what used to sound confident and hopeful now feels tired and frustrated.

Adding to the fuel, one investor recently posted his personal journey with MSTR investment, which is down 68.28% in the past year.

He added,

“Granted it’s not a large sum, but to date, it’s at rock bottom of my entire portfolio. Maybe one day that’ll change, but as of today, I can see why some advocate for #Bitcoin in cold storage.”

Market bleeds—should you be concerned?

This coincided with Bitcoin sliding 3.79% in 24 hours to trade at $63,234.71. Meanwhile, Strategy’s stock, MSTR, was hit even harder, dropping 5.60% to a price of $123.71.

But Saylor isn’t the only giant currently underwater. On the 23rd of February, Tom Lee’s Bitmine (BMNR) mirrored the strategy, acquiring an additional 51,162 Ethereum [ETH] ($98.33 million).

Bitmine now sits on a mountain of 4.42 million ETH, but with an average cost of $3,821, that position is currently drowning in $8.4 billion worth of unrealized loss.

Much like MSTR, Bitmine’s stock is feeling the burn, falling by 4.52% to $19.22 as Ethereum itself slipped 2.59% to $1,828.64 in the past day.

Ergo, the question now isn’t about buying more Bitcoin but about who can endure the pain longer.


Final Summary

  • Buying more Bitcoin no longer excites the market the way it once did.
  • Social sentiment reflects fatigue rather than optimism.

Related Questions

QWhat milestone did MicroStrategy recently achieve with its Bitcoin purchases, and how many BTC did it acquire in its latest transaction?

AMicroStrategy recently completed its 100th Bitcoin purchase, acquiring 592 BTC for approximately $39.8 million on February 22nd.

QWhat is the total amount of Bitcoin that MicroStrategy now holds, and what is the company's average purchase price per coin?

AMicroStrategy's total Bitcoin holdings now amount to 717,722 BTC, with an average purchase price of $76,020 per coin.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary criticism from investors and skeptics like Peter Schiff regarding MicroStrategy's Bitcoin accumulation strategy?

AThe primary criticism is that MicroStrategy's accumulation strategy has resulted in nearly $7 billion in unrealized losses, with critics pointing out that the price often moves against them after each purchase, increasing their overall losses.

QHow did the prices of Bitcoin (BTC) and MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR) perform in the recent market decline mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin's price slid 3.79% in 24 hours to $63,234.71, while MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR) dropped 5.60% to $123.71.

QBesides MicroStrategy, which other company is mentioned as having a similar strategy and facing significant unrealized losses on its cryptocurrency holdings?

ABitmine (BMNR) is mentioned as acquiring an additional 51,162 Ethereum (ETH) and now holds 4.42 million ETH with an average cost of $3,821, resulting in $8.4 billion in unrealized losses.

Related Reads

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbit1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片