Meta Picks Solana And Polygon For Creator Stablecoin Payouts

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-30Last updated on 2026-04-30

Meta has begun rolling out USDC payouts for select creators in Colombia and the Philippines, marking the company’s most concrete return to crypto payments since the collapse of its Libra and Diem ambitions. The feature uses Solana and Polygon as supported blockchain rails, putting two major public networks inside a creator-payment flow run through Meta’s payout system.

According to Meta’s business help page, stablecoin payouts are currently available only to select creators in the two markets. Fortune reported that creators who choose the option are asked to add a third-party crypto wallet address to Facebook’s payout platform, with payments made in USDC over Solana or Polygon. Meta is not providing its own conversion service from USDC into local currency, meaning creators who want fiat will need to rely on external wallets, exchanges or payment services.

Meta Turns To Solana And Polygon

The rollout is narrow, but the signal is larger. Meta is not launching a new currency, not reviving Libra, and not trying to build a vertically controlled global money network. Instead, the company is testing stablecoin payouts through existing crypto infrastructure, using USDC and established chains to move money to creators in markets where cross-border payouts can be slow, expensive or operationally uneven.

A Meta spokesperson told Fortune that the company is “exploring how stablecoins could become part of our suite of options,” framing the move as an expansion of payment methods rather than a full crypto strategy. Stripe is also involved, with Fortune reporting that the payments company is working with Meta on the rollout and that Meta’s page references Stripe for crypto-specific tax reporting tied to the payouts.

For Solana, the integration gives the network another high-profile payments use case at a time when stablecoins have become a central battleground for blockchain adoption. The official Solana account called the news directly on X: “BREAKING: Meta adds support for USDC payments on Solana for creators in Colombia and the Philippines.”

That post was quickly amplified by ecosystem voices. Vibhu Norby, Chief Product Officer & Interim CMO at Solana Foundation, wrote: “All the money in the world will move on Solana. You’re just a bit earlier to it than everyone else.”

Mert Mumtaz, CEO of Helius, framed the Meta rollout as part of a broader stablecoin stack forming around Solana. “Meta just added stablecoin payments via solana! Altitude has just launched a full platform for stablecoins and banking on solana. Ramp also recently added solana support. And we have a privacy solution cooking. Quietly becoming the best place for payments & stables.”

Polygon’s inclusion is equally notable. Fortune cited Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron as saying that marketplace payouts are increasingly being built on blockchain infrastructure such as Polygon, while adding that Meta’s stablecoin payout program is expected to expand to more than 160 countries by year-end.

The contrast with Libra is sharp. Meta’s earlier stablecoin effort, later renamed Diem, was abandoned in 2022 after sustained regulatory resistance. This time, the company is not attempting to issue a Meta-controlled coin. It is using USDC, a widely circulated dollar-backed stablecoin, and routing payouts across existing public blockchain networks rather than trying to define the monetary layer itself.

At press time, SOL traded at $82.92.

SOL must reclaim the 20-week EMA, 1-monthly chart | Source: SOLUSDT on TradingView.com

Related Reads

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, recently celebrated its sixth anniversary. Born during New York's COVID-19 lockdown, founder Shayne Coplan built the initial product from his bathroom. The platform allows users to trade on the outcomes of real-world events, aiming to aggregate information faster than traditional media or polls. Its early years involved navigating regulatory challenges, most notably a 2022 CFTC order and penalty for offering unregistered event contracts, which led to a ban on U.S. users. Despite this "exile," the platform persisted, gaining significant traction during major news events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election, where its markets often preceded mainstream narratives. A pivotal shift occurred in 2025. Following the conclusion of a DOJ/CFTC investigation, Polymarket strategically acquired a CFTC-regulated exchange (QCX) to re-enter the U.S. market legally. It secured a massive strategic investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), NYSE's parent company, and formed high-profile partnerships with sports leagues like the NHL, UFC, and MLB, as well as media outlets including Google and the Wall Street Journal. Now valued in the tens of billions, Polymarket stands at the intersection of crypto, finance, media, and sports. Its journey reflects a constant tension between innovative information aggregation and regulatory scrutiny, evolving from a fringe crypto experiment into a mainstream, albeit still contested, financial and data infrastructure.

marsbit4m ago

Polymarket's Sixth Anniversary: Bathroom, Exile, and Homecoming

marsbit4m ago

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

"Metaplanet's 'Side Hustle Survival': After the 'Crypto Hoarding Flywheel' Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue" The article discusses the strategic pivot of Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies as the once-lucrative model of hoarding cryptocurrencies, pioneered by MicroStrategy, faces challenges. With the crypto bear market and the rise of ETFs offering direct, low-premium exposure, many DAT firms are abandoning the passive treasury model. Prominent examples include ETHZilla, which sold ETH to repay debt and shifted to RWA tokenization, and others like Prenetics Global exiting completely. Facing stalled growth, remaining companies are pursuing two main survival paths. The first path is transforming into institutional crypto asset management platforms and yield funds. SharpLink Gaming exemplifies this by staking 100% of its ETH and partnering with Galaxy Digital to launch a yield fund. GameSquare is taking a more aggressive approach, using AI-driven algorithms across DeFi protocols to seek higher returns. The second path involves becoming blockchain infrastructure operators, particularly in the Solana ecosystem. Companies like DeFi Development and SOL Strategies are moving beyond holding SOL to operating validator networks and launching liquid staking tokens, building fee-based revenue models from ecosystem participation. The article notes these transitions reflect a broader industry maturation, shifting from financial engineering to building operational moats through technology, network effects, and deep ecosystem integration. However, risks remain, including DeFi protocol vulnerabilities and dependence on specific blockchain networks' health. Ultimately, this collective shift signals that in crypto, sustainable value comes not from capital games but from active participation, cash flow generation, and providing real utility—a necessary, if painful, step towards industry maturity.

marsbit5m ago

The 'Side Hustle Survival' of DAT Companies: After the Accumulation Flywheel Stops, They Begin Self-Rescue

marsbit5m ago

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

Leaked OpenAI financial documents from June 2026 revealed that in 2025, the company achieved $13.07 billion in revenue, a 253% growth from 2024. However, this was accompanied by an operational loss of $20.92 billion and a net loss of roughly $8 billion. Despite ChatGPT surpassing 900 million weekly active users, the "burn rate" remained high: for every $1 earned, $1.60 was spent. The cost structure shows $34 billion in total costs. R&D was the largest expense at $19.18 billion, which included $10.59 billion paid to Microsoft. Compute costs for model inference were $7.5 billion, with sales and marketing at $5.73 billion. Notably, total payments to Microsoft reached $17.2 billion, accounting for over 50% of OpenAI's total costs and exceeding its annual revenue, highlighting a significant structural burden. This high-cost, high-loss model is an industry-wide trend. xAI reported a 2025 operational loss of $6.4 billion against $3.2 billion in revenue, spending $3 for every $1 earned. Anthropic, with a reported $90 billion annualized revenue by late 2025, also faced pressure with a 40% gross margin, lower than expected due to high inference costs. Combined, these top three firms' operational losses surpassed $30 billion in 2025. OpenAI's vast user base presents a monetization challenge. With only about 50 million of its 900 million weekly users paying (a ~5.6% conversion rate), the compute cost of serving free users is substantial. This contrasts with strategies like Anthropic's, which focuses on premium pricing for enterprise clients. The industry's path to profitability hinges on dramatically reducing marginal costs, particularly for inference, through innovations in specialized chips or model efficiency. Until then, massive capital inflows—like OpenAI's $122 billion funding round in March 2026—remain essential to fund the relentless pursuit of scale and advanced capabilities.

marsbit17m ago

Annual Revenue of 13 Billion, Paying 17.2 Billion to Microsoft: The Truth Behind AI's Money-Burning in OpenAI's Leaked Ledger

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片