MegaETH Loses Another Key Player! Noise Shifts to Base After Securing Funding from Paradigm

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Noise, an early incubated project of MegaETH, has secured a $7.1 million seed round led by Paradigm, with participation from Figment Capital, Anagram, and others. The platform is a trend-trading marketplace where users can long or short contracts based on the popularity of trends, brands, and ideas, using aggregated social activity data from X (formerly Twitter) to create a transparent attention index. Despite being part of MegaETH’s accelerator program, Noise announced it will launch its mainnet on Base in the coming months, rather than remaining within the MegaETH ecosystem. This move has sparked controversy, with some viewing it as a betrayal, while others argue Base’s larger user base and liquidity may better support Noise’s growth. This is not the first time a key project has left MegaETH; earlier, DEX GTE also departed after raising significant funding, and stablecoin project Cap adopted a dual-chain strategy prioritizing Ethereum. These exits highlight ongoing challenges for MegaETH in retaining ecosystem projects, though they also underscore its ability to incubate high-potential startups.

Author: Nancy, PANews

MegaETH's ecosystem has lost another key player.

On January 14, Noise, an early incubated project of MegaETH, announced the completion of a $7.1 million seed funding round led by Paradigm. However, the focus of this funding round was not the amount, but Noise's unexpected decision to shift to Base instead of remaining with MegaETH. This defection of a core project adds more uncertainty to the development of MegaETH's ecosystem.

Betting on the Attention Economy, Completes Paradigm-Led Seed Funding Round

After just half a year, the New York-based startup team Noise has once again caught the eye of capital.

On January 14, Noise officially announced the completion of a $7.1 million seed funding round. This round was led by renowned venture capital firm Paradigm, with participation from Figment Capital, Anagram, GSR, JPEG Trading, and KaitoAI, among other institutions. Several angel investors, including Jordi Hays, Dan Romero, and Kain Warwick, also took part.

The funds will be primarily used to accelerate the construction of trading infrastructure and advance the mainnet launch process. Prior to this, Noise had completed a pre-seed funding round in July 2025 with participation from Figment Capital and Anagram.

According to official introductions, Noise is a trend trading platform focused on relevance, aiming to capture the people and things currently capturing the internet's attention. Here, users can go long or short on contracts related to trends, brands, and ideas, much like trading stocks. Trading activity generates prices—not just numbers, but an objective standard for measuring cultural relevance.

This pricing mechanism stems from two signals: data and trading. Noise aggregates activity data from X (formerly Twitter) to calculate a transparent attention index for each trend, thereby measuring the heat of social interactions across the network in real-time. When users invest real money to establish positions, they are essentially voting with their capital, optimizing the quality of information driving the prices. Ultimately, Noise forms a market that combines objective data performance with the subjective beliefs of traders.

For users, Noise provides a new tool for quantifying trends. For example, a toy brand manager could use it to hedge the attention risk associated with marketing expenditures; a fashion brand could discover emerging talent by observing who is rising on the leaderboard; investors could express their firm beliefs about which AI lab is gaining the most cultural momentum. In essence, Noise offers users a new type of daily news, turning previously vague popularity into clear, tradable assets.

Over the past year, the explosion of prediction markets has proven that binary questions can support massive economic activity. However, in terms of market positioning, platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi offer "yes or no" options for specific dates, while Noise focuses on the real-time evolution of relevance, providing answers to "how hot is it now" and "where is this heat heading," making it a complementary and alternative solution to prediction markets.

Noise's model has been preliminarily validated during the testnet phase. In the Beta version launched last May, 1,300 users across 14 markets not only contributed trading volume but also demonstrated remarkable stickiness. Three months later, the active retention rate for first-month users remained at 62%, with an average single-use duration of 17 minutes, indirectly proving the real demand for attention trading.

Ecosystem Projects Successively Break Away, MegaETH Faces Retention Challenges

Compared to the support from the investment lineup and the amount raised, the news of Noise's decision to break away seems to have drawn more market attention.

According to the plan, Noise will launch its mainnet on Base in the coming months, opening to the public for the first time and supporting real-money trading. However, this strategic shift has sparked considerable controversy within the community.

As is well known, Noise was once one of the star projects incubated by MegaETH's accelerator, Megamafia. But upon "graduation," Noise chose to abandon MegaETH and instead, with funding, join the Base ecosystem.

This move was seen by many as a betrayal and faces the risk of a cold start on a new chain. MegaETH官方 even unfollowed the founder of Noise's account on the day the funding news was announced. However, some voices argue that the attention economy赛道 is inherently a流量 business. Compared to the technically robust but still early-stage MegaETH ecosystem, Base, with its vast user base and liquidity, might better support Noise's launch and development.

In fact, this is not the first time MegaETH has experienced a core project going independent.

As early as June 2025, DEX GTE announced it had secured a $15 million Series A funding round exclusively led by Paradigm, bringing its total funding to over $25 million. This news was interpreted by the community as a major positive for the rise of the MegaETH ecosystem. However, just two months later, the plot took a sharp turn. GTE announced a "breakup," leaving behind the意味深长的 statement "GTE has grown up and is now leaving Mega Mafia," followed by an announcement of plans to launch an independent mainnet. It is worth noting that the project's testnet had once attracted over a million users in just a few months.

Another stablecoin project, Cap, also received capital recognition, completing a $11 million funding round from institutions like Franklin Templeton and Triton Capital. Although it did not completely break away, it adopted a dual-chain strategy of "prioritizing Ethereum, with MegaETH playing a supporting role," which was seen as lacking sufficient confidence in the original ecosystem's liquidity.

Losing key players one after another undoubtedly poses a severe ecological retention challenge for MegaETH, which is still in its early stages. But from another perspective, this also showcases MegaETH's incubation capabilities from the side.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Noise and what problem does it aim to solve?

ANoise is a trending trading platform that allows users to long or short contracts on trends, brands, and ideas, similar to trading stocks. It aims to capture what the internet is paying attention to by creating a market that combines objective data (like social activity from X) with trader sentiment, providing a quantifiable and tradable measure of cultural relevance.

QWho led the seed funding round for Noise and how much was raised?

AThe seed funding round for Noise was led by Paradigm, and a total of $7.1 million was raised.

QWhy did Noise's decision to launch on Base instead of MegaETH cause controversy?

AThe decision caused controversy because Noise was a key project incubated by MegaETH's Megamafia accelerator. Choosing to launch on Base instead of staying with MegaETH was seen by some as a betrayal, leading MegaETH to unfollow Noise's founder. Others argued Base's larger user base and liquidity were better for a platform like Noise.

QBesides Noise, name another project that left the MegaETH ecosystem and what it did.

AAnother project that left the MegaETH ecosystem is the DEX GTE. After raising a $15 million Series A round led by Paradigm, it announced it was 'leaving Mega Mafia' and planned to launch its own independent mainnet.

QWhat key metric from Noise's beta test demonstrated strong user engagement?

ADuring its beta test, Noise demonstrated strong user engagement with a 62% active retention rate for its first-month users after three months and an average session duration of 17 minutes.

Related Reads

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit11m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit11m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手23m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手23m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit37m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit37m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手41m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手41m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片