‘Market knows something’: Meteora’s odds climb to 28% on Polymarket

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-25Last updated on 2026-02-25

Abstract

The crypto community is anticipating a major investigation by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, set to be released on February 26, which is expected to expose insider trading at a major crypto business. In response, prediction market Polymarket has seen significant betting activity on which entity will be implicated. Initially, Meteora was the top suspect with 53% odds, but its probability has since to 28%, despite its central role in Solana's DeFi during the memecoin boom. Other contenders include Pump.fun (12%), Axiom (11%), MEXC, and Jupiter (both around 11-14%). Interestingly, Meteora's token price rose 7.44% despite the increased scrutiny, while Pump.fun's fell. The situation highlights market uncertainty ahead of ZachXBT's evidence-based reveal, reminiscent of his previous exposure of a $282 million hack in January.

In a brewing series, the crypto community is waiting for on-chain investigator ZachXBT to release the results of what he calls a “major investigation.”

He is expected to reveal everything on the 26th of February. Until then, the industry is stuck in a tense waiting period, but the market is not staying quiet.

On Polymarket, people have already started betting on the outcome. Million has flowed into a prediction market where users are guessing which major player – Meteora, World Liberty Financial, or even a big exchange – might be exposed for insider trading.

ZachXBT threw a ball of fire

The betting began on the 23rd of February, shortly after ZachXBT hinted at the investigation.

Taking to X, ZachXBT had noted,

“Major investigation dropping February 26 on one of crypto’s most profitable businesses, where multiple employees abused internal data to insider trade over a prolonged period of time.”

Since then, the hype is there, as highlighted by CNBC crypto trader Ran Neuner, who said,

“ZachXBT drops his biggest investigation in 48 hours. Multiple employees. One of crypto’s most profitable businesses. Insider trading over a prolonged period. The top revenue tokens are already bleeding. The market knows something you don’t.”

Why are people betting more on Meteora?

By the 24th of February, Meteora had become the top target, with its chances rising to 53%. Many bettors focused on its central role in Solana’s DeFi system.

During the 2024–2025 memecoin boom, huge volumes of tokens like Official Trump ($TRUMP) and $MELANIA passed through Meteora’s vaults. Traders believe this may have created opportunities for insiders to misuse private data.

But by the 25th of February, confidence started to fade.

Meteora’s odds dropped sharply to 28%. Behind Meteora, the market remains divided among several other names. Pump.fun, currently at 12%, has seen the largest single bet so far, worth $332,000, yet its odds have barely changed.

Axiom, at 11%, was once viewed as a strong contender, but its chances have dropped by nearly 40% since the market opened, suggesting fading confidence.

Meanwhile, MEXC and Jupiter hover between 14% and 11%, showing limited but steady attention.

Jupiter’s inclusion reflects ongoing doubts about Solana’s trading routes, while MEXC continues to face pressure due to online claims about how it handles memecoin listings.

Market plays heads and tails

This coincided with Meteora ($MET) trading at $0.1798, up 7.44% in just one day, even though its chances of being blamed dropped sharply. Jupiter ($JUP) also rose 4.33% to $0.1475. Meanwhile, Pump.fun continued to fall, down 2.34% to $0.001720.

Needless to say, ZachXBT has built his reputation on hard blockchain evidence, not rumors, tracing funds step by step across networks.

Recently, in January, he proved this again after a social engineering attack drained over $282 million from a single investor.

Now, as February 26 approaches, the same cycle is unfolding again, with everyone waiting to see who becomes the culprit.


Final Summary

  • The gap between prediction odds and token prices reflects deep uncertainty across the crypto ecosystem.
  • The January $282 million hack proved that even strong security fails when human trust is exploited.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main event that the crypto community is waiting for, as mentioned in the article?

AThe crypto community is waiting for on-chain investigator ZachXBT to release the results of a 'major investigation' on February 26th.

QOn which prediction market are people betting on the outcome of ZachXBT's investigation?

APeople are betting on the outcome on the prediction market Polymarket.

QWhich entity had the highest prediction market odds of being exposed, and what was its peak percentage?

AMeteora had the highest prediction market odds, peaking at 53%.

QAccording to the article, what is one reason traders suspected Meteora might be involved in insider trading?

ATraders suspected that during the memecoin boom, huge volumes of tokens passed through Meteora's vaults, which may have created opportunities for insiders to misuse private data.

QWhat does the article cite as proof of ZachXBT's reputation and methodology?

AThe article states that ZachXBT built his reputation on hard blockchain evidence, tracing funds step by step across networks, and cites his work in January tracing a $282 million social engineering attack as a recent example.

Related Reads

On the Eve of X Money's Launch, Musk Dismantles the Referee First

"X Money Launches After Dismantling Regulator: Musk's 9-Day Power Play" In February 2025, a team from the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), led by Elon Musk, entered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) headquarters. Shortly after, the CFPB was effectively dismantled—its funding frozen, activities suspended, and nearly 90% of staff laid off. This move came just nine days after X announced a partnership with Visa and as X Money prepared to launch. The article contrasts this with the decade-long regulatory battles faced by companies like Coinbase and PayPal. Coinbase spent over $75 million in political contributions and endured a major SEC lawsuit to operate legally. PayPal complied with strict state and federal rules for its stablecoin PYUSD, including 100% reserve requirements and monthly audits. However, Musk’s approach was different. After the CFPB introduced a rule placing large digital payment apps under federal oversight, Musk tweeted "Delete CFPB." Within months, the rule was revoked by Congress. Meanwhile, DOGE operatives gained "god-tier" access to CFPB databases, potentially obtaining sensitive competitive information from rivals like Apple, Google, and PayPal. The article also highlights a "suspicious exemption clause" in the GENIUS Act, which allows private companies like X to issue stablecoins with fewer restrictions. Senator Elizabeth Warren questioned whether Musk, who was a senior presidential advisor during the Act’s drafting, influenced this clause. X Money offers a 6% APY on deposits, despite FDIC warnings that stablecoin users are not insured. As X Money launches to 600 million monthly users, the article questions the fairness of a system where Musk can bypass regulations that others spent years and millions to comply with. The dismantling of the CFPB and the alleged regulatory advantages raise concerns about the future of equitable rule-making in the U.S. financial system.

marsbit1m ago

On the Eve of X Money's Launch, Musk Dismantles the Referee First

marsbit1m ago

Three Frameworks for Ordinary People to Achieve AI Capability Leap: Say Goodbye to the Dilemma of 'Repeating Inputs Every Day'

Summary: This article outlines three frameworks for maximizing AI efficiency, moving beyond basic prompt usage. 1. **Three-Layer Evolution**: Users progress from (1) **Prompt** (one-off instructions, reset each session), to (2) **Project** (context-aware within a specific project), to (3) **Skill** (permanent, auto-applied knowledge). Most users stagnate at the first layer, repeating the same instructions daily with no cumulative improvement. Skills transform the AI from a chat tool into a personalized work system. 2. **Transaction vs. Compound Interest Mindset**: Using prompts is a linear transaction—effort and output are 1:1, and stopping resets progress. Investing time in building Skills is compound interest; a small initial time investment pays continuous dividends, as each Skill permanently elevates the AI's baseline performance. 3. **Thin Harness, Fat Skills**: The system architecture should prioritize thick, well-defined Skills (90% of the value—containing processes, standards, and domain knowledge) and a thin "harness" (the minimal technical environment). Avoid over-engineering the toolchain while neglecting the AI's actual knowledge. Skills are permanent assets that automatically improve with model updates. The key takeaway: Identify tasks you repeat, encode them into Skills (using tools like Claude's Skill Creator), and shift focus from daily prompting to building a compounding, self-improving AI system.

marsbit53m ago

Three Frameworks for Ordinary People to Achieve AI Capability Leap: Say Goodbye to the Dilemma of 'Repeating Inputs Every Day'

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片