Mantra’s OM extends 2025 loss to 99% – Why the team blames OKX

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-15Last updated on 2025-12-15

Abstract

Mantra's OM token crashed over 99% in 2025, leading to a public dispute between the project team and crypto exchange OKX. OKX accused the Mantra team of borrowing significant USDT and using OM as collateral to artificially inflate the token’s price, prompting the exchange to freeze accounts and liquidate holdings. The exchange questioned the origin of large OM quantities and dismissed the team's claims as misleading. Mantra CEO JP Mullin denied any legal action against OKX, stating the issue is between the exchange and larger OM traders. Despite earlier gains of 600% during the late 2024 rally, OM’s value plummeted following the controversy. As of press time, OM traded at $0.07 amid bearish sentiment. The project is proceeding with its planned migration to a Layer 1 blockchain, converting OM to MANTRA by January 2026, with over 36,000 holders still involved.

Since Mantra’s OM token crashed by over 99% in April, the project team and crypto exchange OKX have been embroiled in an ongoing blame game at the expense of investors.

In a recent statement, the exchange claimed that the team borrowed ‘significant amounts of USDT’ and used OM as collateral to ‘inflate’ the price of the token.

Following the price manipulation, the exchange’s risk team was forced to freeze the accounts and liquidate a portion of Mantra [OM] after the price fell slightly, triggering an aggressive sell-off across other platforms.

OKX added,

“There has been no explanation of where those unusually large quantities of OM originated, nor why these groups of individuals held and controlled such a substantial portion of the token supply.”

The exchange called the Mantra team’s accusations a ‘misleading narrative.’

Mixed reactions to OM’s price crash

However, other users, like Park Yong, questioned OKX’s interest and posed,

“If OKX genuinely viewed $OM as a scam, the response would be simple: delist it, allow withdrawals, and move on.”

He added,

“Is this really about user protection, or is there internal exposure related to $OM that became uncomfortable once migration timelines came into play?”

For the unfamiliar, Mantra is a tokenization-focused protocol that will be migrating into a fully fledged Layer 1 (L2) from Ethereum.

As a result, it will change its ERC-20 governance token, OM, to MANTRA., The migration will be finalized by the 15th of January 2026.

With the migration schedule, OKX reached out to the team to help facilitate the conversion of its OM holdings.

Although the exchange said that there were legal actions underway, Mantra CEO JP Mullin denied such actions, affirming,

“Neither MANTRA or myself have any ongoing litigation or legal actions ongoing with OKX. This is between them and other larger traders/investors of OM.”

Mantra reverses 600% gain

During the late 2024 rally, which extended into February 2025, OM posted a 600% gain.

Although it erased part of the gains amid early 2025 tariff headwinds, it dumped over 80% after OKX froze the team accounts amid manipulation claims.

As of press time, OM traded at $0.07 and had been experiencing overwhelmingly bearish sentiment in the Futures market, according to CoinGlass.

But beyond the price chart, the chain has been positioning itself with new products, including a stablecoin, MantraUSD.

There are still over 36K holders of OM ahead of the migration. It remains to be seen whether the migration will help the chain move past the OKX and project team scandal.


Final Thoughts

  • The Mantra team and OKX have denied crashing the OM price by over 90% in 2025.
  • Large OM investors were reportedly suing OKX for losses, according to the Mantra chain CEO.

Related Reads

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit35m ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit35m ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

After Alphabet's announcement of an $84.75 billion equity financing round, market focus for AI investment is shifting from pure growth narratives to capital efficiency and payback periods. The core argument is that AI is being re-priced from a software-like growth story into a heavy-asset infrastructure cycle, requiring massive capital expenditure (CapEx) on chips, data centers, and power grids. While Alphabet's financing itself is not a distress signal—part of it is for administrative purposes like tax obligations on stock compensation—it highlights the enormous capital demands of AI infrastructure. This demand extends beyond tech giants to pure-play AI model companies (like OpenAI, Anthropic), data center REITs, and utilities. Major tech firms are projected to spend heavily on AI data centers in 2026, signaling a broad-based capital cycle the market must absorb. Consequently, valuation logic is changing. Investors are moving away from questions about who has the strongest AI narrative and are now prioritizing clear visibility into orders, stable cash flows, and the cost of capital. This has led to recent pressure on high-multiple AI software and semiconductor stocks, while "picks-and-shovels" hardware, data center, and power assets with firmer near-term demand may see relative support. The key going forward will be monitoring whether rising CapEx guidance across companies is matched by a timely monetization of AI investments into revenue and cash flow. The market's tolerance for high spending depends on demonstrable returns. While the long-term AI thesis remains intact, the valuation framework has fundamentally shifted to emphasize capital discipline and payback speed.

marsbit42m ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片