Liquidity shock? LIT drops 16% after Justin Sun pulls funds from Lighter

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-07Last updated on 2026-03-07

Abstract

LIT, the native token of Lighter DEX, dropped over 16% to a record low of $1.15 following reports that Justin Sun withdrew $40.76 million from its liquidity pool. In total, Sun removed $152 million, representing 18% of the platform's total USDC TVL. This triggered significant net outflows of $155.1 million on March 5th, the second-largest daily withdrawal in the platform’s history. Sun clarified that he was “rebalancing” his wallets and intends to redeposit the funds, reaffirming his long-term bullish stance on Lighter. Despite the sell-off, major LIT whales did not reduce their holdings, suggesting the downturn was driven by retail and leveraged traders.

LIT, the native token of Lighter DEX, shed over 16% of its value into the weekend.

The token slipped from $1.38 to a record low of $1.15. The decline followed reports that Justin Sun, the founder of TRON, had withdrawn $40 million from the DEX’s liquidity pool.

According to an on-chain analyst, MLM, Sun withdrew $40.76 million from Lighter LLP on Thursday during the U.S trading session.

The analyst noted that Sun collectively removed a total of $152 million from the trading platform. This represented 18% of Lighter’s total USDC TVL (total locked value). In response, traders expressed bearish views about the move. This was evidenced by LIT’s sharp sell-off.

Lighter’s daily outflows hit $155M

A deeper look into the Lighter DEX reinforced the analyst’s findings, with Artemis data flagging a whopping $155.1 million in net outflows on 05 March.

This was the second-highest daily outflow from Lighter after the 10 October crash, which saw $179 million in outflows.

With over 90% of withdrawals driven by Sun, the community is now worried about his move.

In response, Sun clarified that he was just “rebalancing” his wallets and would deposit the funds back into the LLP.

“We still hold all LIT purchased and remain bullish on Lighter long term. We are rebalancing wallets and will redeposit into LLP soon.”

It remains unclear whether Sun’s move was linked to the recent SEC dismissal of a fraud case against him and his firms.

However, it’s worth pointing out that such a massive withdrawal from a liquidy pool doesn’t necessarily mean a trading platform is unsafe. On the contrary, it does affect market depth and could increase slippages, making it risky and volatile to enter or exit large orders.

Whales hold on to their LIT

Surprisingly though, the recent plunge wasn’t driven by top whales.

Santiment showed that wallets holding 1 million LIT to 1 billion LIT showed no changes in their balance in March, let alone on Thursday – A sign that the recent sell-off was likely driven by retail holders and leverage traders.

It remains to be seen whether these resilient whales will help form a base for LIT to rebound and reverse recent losses.


Final Summary

  • LIT dropped by 16% over the weekend after Justin Sun withdrew over $150 million from the DEX’s liquidity pool.
  • Sun reassured the community that he would deposit the funds again soon.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage drop in LIT's value and what triggered it?

ALIT's value dropped by over 16% after Justin Sun withdrew $40 million from the Lighter DEX liquidity pool.

QHow much did Justin Sun collectively withdraw from the Lighter trading platform and what percentage of the total USDC TVL did this represent?

AJustin Sun collectively withdrew a total of $152 million, which represented 18% of Lighter's total USDC TVL (Total Value Locked).

QWhat reason did Justin Sun give for his large withdrawal from the liquidity pool?

AJustin Sun clarified that he was 'rebalancing' his wallets and stated that he would deposit the funds back into the LLP soon, remaining bullish on Lighter long-term.

QAccording to Santiment data, who was primarily responsible for the recent sell-off of LIT tokens?

AThe recent sell-off was likely driven by retail holders and leverage traders, as wallets held by top whales (holding 1 million to 1 billion LIT) showed no changes in their balances.

QWhat was the net outflow from Lighter DEX on March 5th, and how does it compare to the record outflow?

AThere was a net outflow of $155.1 million from Lighter DEX on March 5th, which was the second-highest daily outflow after the record of $179 million set on October 10th.

Related Reads

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit4m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit4m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手16m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手16m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit30m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbit30m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手34m ago

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy SUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SUN (SUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SUN (SUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SUN (SUN)After purchasing your SUN (SUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SUN (SUN)Easily trade SUN (SUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.5k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SUN (SUN) are presented below.

活动图片