Liquidity shock? LIT drops 16% after Justin Sun pulls funds from Lighter

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-07Last updated on 2026-03-07

Abstract

LIT, the native token of Lighter DEX, dropped over 16% to a record low of $1.15 following reports that Justin Sun withdrew $40.76 million from its liquidity pool. In total, Sun removed $152 million, representing 18% of the platform's total USDC TVL. This triggered significant net outflows of $155.1 million on March 5th, the second-largest daily withdrawal in the platform’s history. Sun clarified that he was “rebalancing” his wallets and intends to redeposit the funds, reaffirming his long-term bullish stance on Lighter. Despite the sell-off, major LIT whales did not reduce their holdings, suggesting the downturn was driven by retail and leveraged traders.

LIT, the native token of Lighter DEX, shed over 16% of its value into the weekend.

The token slipped from $1.38 to a record low of $1.15. The decline followed reports that Justin Sun, the founder of TRON, had withdrawn $40 million from the DEX’s liquidity pool.

According to an on-chain analyst, MLM, Sun withdrew $40.76 million from Lighter LLP on Thursday during the U.S trading session.

The analyst noted that Sun collectively removed a total of $152 million from the trading platform. This represented 18% of Lighter’s total USDC TVL (total locked value). In response, traders expressed bearish views about the move. This was evidenced by LIT’s sharp sell-off.

Lighter’s daily outflows hit $155M

A deeper look into the Lighter DEX reinforced the analyst’s findings, with Artemis data flagging a whopping $155.1 million in net outflows on 05 March.

This was the second-highest daily outflow from Lighter after the 10 October crash, which saw $179 million in outflows.

With over 90% of withdrawals driven by Sun, the community is now worried about his move.

In response, Sun clarified that he was just “rebalancing” his wallets and would deposit the funds back into the LLP.

“We still hold all LIT purchased and remain bullish on Lighter long term. We are rebalancing wallets and will redeposit into LLP soon.”

It remains unclear whether Sun’s move was linked to the recent SEC dismissal of a fraud case against him and his firms.

However, it’s worth pointing out that such a massive withdrawal from a liquidy pool doesn’t necessarily mean a trading platform is unsafe. On the contrary, it does affect market depth and could increase slippages, making it risky and volatile to enter or exit large orders.

Whales hold on to their LIT

Surprisingly though, the recent plunge wasn’t driven by top whales.

Santiment showed that wallets holding 1 million LIT to 1 billion LIT showed no changes in their balance in March, let alone on Thursday – A sign that the recent sell-off was likely driven by retail holders and leverage traders.

It remains to be seen whether these resilient whales will help form a base for LIT to rebound and reverse recent losses.


Final Summary

  • LIT dropped by 16% over the weekend after Justin Sun withdrew over $150 million from the DEX’s liquidity pool.
  • Sun reassured the community that he would deposit the funds again soon.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage drop in LIT's value and what triggered it?

ALIT's value dropped by over 16% after Justin Sun withdrew $40 million from the Lighter DEX liquidity pool.

QHow much did Justin Sun collectively withdraw from the Lighter trading platform and what percentage of the total USDC TVL did this represent?

AJustin Sun collectively withdrew a total of $152 million, which represented 18% of Lighter's total USDC TVL (Total Value Locked).

QWhat reason did Justin Sun give for his large withdrawal from the liquidity pool?

AJustin Sun clarified that he was 'rebalancing' his wallets and stated that he would deposit the funds back into the LLP soon, remaining bullish on Lighter long-term.

QAccording to Santiment data, who was primarily responsible for the recent sell-off of LIT tokens?

AThe recent sell-off was likely driven by retail holders and leverage traders, as wallets held by top whales (holding 1 million to 1 billion LIT) showed no changes in their balances.

QWhat was the net outflow from Lighter DEX on March 5th, and how does it compare to the record outflow?

AThere was a net outflow of $155.1 million from Lighter DEX on March 5th, which was the second-highest daily outflow after the record of $179 million set on October 10th.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit12m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit12m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit13m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit13m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News23m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News23m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit40m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy SUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SUN (SUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SUN (SUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SUN (SUN)After purchasing your SUN (SUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SUN (SUN)Easily trade SUN (SUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.5k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SUN (SUN) are presented below.

活动图片