"Legal" Ponzi Scheme? Uncovering Gemini Exchange and Its Founders' Circular Lending

Author|Protos Staff

Compiled| WuBlockchain

TL;DR: Key Points from Gemini's 10-K Report and Internal Lending Cycle

·Shuffling Funds Between Hands: Founders' WCF lent crypto assets to Gemini, which then collateralized them with third parties to obtain USD loans, forming an internal circular lending scheme.

·Cheap Acquisition of Control: During the IPO, founders' debt was converted into super-voting shares at a 20% discount. Retail investors bought in at high prices, while the founders secured 94.7% voting control.

<极简主义风格，只翻译核心内容，去除冗余解释>

·Sword of Damocles

Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss lent thousands of Bitcoin ($BTC) and Ethereum ($ETH) to their own crypto exchange Gemini through their private investment firm Winklevoss Capital Fund (WCF). Gemini then used these crypto assets as collateral with On September 15, 2025, the exchange went public at $28 per share and converted $695.6 million of WCF debt into super-voting Class B shares at a 20% discount, giving the twins direct control of 94.7% of Gemini's voting power.

Attached X platform post:

This is all a circular Ponzi scheme:

Borrow BTC from related party WCF; collateralize that BTC with lenders to get USD loans (involving Galaxy, bond issuance, NYDIG).

Deloitte issued an unqualified audit opinion: no Key Audit Matters (KAM), and said nothing about related parties, liquidity, going concern...

How is any of this legal?

Here is the basic flow of funds. The twins' WCF lent BTC and ETH to Gemini under open-term agreements.

Gemini then used these borrowed crypto assets as collateral with third-party lenders. Galaxy Digital provided a $116.5 million loan at 11–12% interest with a 145–155% collateral ratio. NYDIG provided $75 million via a repurchase agreement at 8.5%.

Gemini used this USD capital for operations and regulatory requirements.

The exchange is now listed on Nasdaq under the ticker GEMI.

It also repaid $238.5 million under the Ripple warehouse credit facility, though $154 million in Ripple debt remained outstanding at year-end.

However, the twins' own debt was not repaid in cash.

A and B shares differ only in voting rights and distribution. Otherwise, they have identical par value, dividend rights, and B shares are convertible to A shares on a one-to-one basis.

Retail paid $28, Winklevoss paid only $22.40

This discount is the core of how this circular operation harms ordinary shareholders.

WCF lent crypto to Gemini. Then,Gemini collateralized these borrowed assets to secure more loans. Specifically, Galaxy and NYDIG lent USD to Gemini for its operations.

Then, Gemini issued equity to WCF at a discount during the same IPO where retail paid 20% more.

Further reading: Sources say Winklevoss twins pulled $280 million out before Genesis collapse

In 2025, Gemini paid WCF $24.2 million in lending fees.

Despite being public, the co-founders retain overwhelming voting control.

Additionally, per crypto researcher Emmett Gallic citing Arkham Intelligence data, WCF held about 8,757 BTC in Gemini Custody addresses.

Deloitte Issues Unqualified Audit Opinion

The twins could shake the foundations of this exchange they control with a simple written notice.

Gemini's secondary market price has crashed 88% from its IPO price. "Gemini Space Station" is its legal name,寓意火箭升空, but it's now ironic. It opened at $37.01 on its first IPO day.

It's now just $4.42 per share.

Gemini set its IPO price at $28 on September 11, 2025. It opened at $37.01 the next day, briefly hit a high of $45.89, then began its decline. After hitting a 52-week low of $3.91 on Monday, it closed at $4.42 on March 31, 2026, down 88% from its opening price.

Market cap has collapsed from over $3.8 billion to about $520 million. Citigroup, Cantor, Truist, and Evercore have all downgraded the stock to "Sell".

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is the core mechanism of the alleged 'circular operation' between Gemini and its founders' WCF?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Winklevoss Capital Fund (WCF) loaned crypto assets to Gemini. Gemini then used these borrowed assets as collateral to secure dollar loans from third-party lenders like Galaxy Digital and NYDIG. This created an internal circular lending loop where funds moved between the founders' entity and their own exchange."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How did the Winklevoss twins consolidate control of Gemini during its IPO?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"During the IPO, $695.6 million of debt owed to WCF was converted into super-voting Class B shares at a 20% discount to the $28 IPO price paid by retail investors ($22.40 per share). This gave the founders 94.7% of the voting power in the company."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What major financial liability does Gemini still owe to WCF, and what risk does it pose?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"As of December 31, 2025, Gemini still owed WCF 4,619 BTC (valued at approximately $400 million at the time). This loan is repayable on demand, posing a significant liquidity risk to the exchange if the founders were to suddenly call it in."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How has Gemini's stock performance fared since its IPO?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Gemini's stock has plummeted 88% from its IPO price of $28 and its first-day opening price of $37.01. It hit a 52-week low of $3.91 and closed at $4.42 on March 31, 2026. Its market capitalization crashed from over $3.8 billion to approximately $520 million."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What was the role of the auditing firm Deloitte in this situation, according to the article?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Deloitte issued an unqualified (clean) audit opinion for Gemini. The article questions this, noting the audit report did not highlight any Key Audit Matters (KAMs) or raise concerns about related-party transactions, liquidity, or the company's going concern status despite the significant risks outlined."}}]}

Related Reads

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

On June 5th, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox disclosed a critical soundness vulnerability in the project's latest Orchard privacy pool. This flaw, found in the elliptic curve multiplication constraints, could allow an attacker to create unlimited counterfeit ZEC within the shielded pool, with transactions appearing valid. The vulnerability was discovered in late May by security researcher Taylor Hornby, who utilized Anthropic's new Opus 4.8 AI model for a targeted audit. The Zcash ecosystem had already performed an emergency network upgrade to patch the issue. However, the detailed disclosure triggered severe market panic, causing ZEC's price to plummet over 30% in a single day. Notably, prominent investor Arthur Hayes announced he had sold his entire ZEC position following the news. The incident starkly challenges the "technological trust" narrative central to privacy coins. Despite years of top-tier cryptographic audits, the bug persisted until uncovered with advanced AI-assisted research. This highlights the growing gap between theoretical perfection and practical implementation in privacy technology. The event serves as a industry-wide warning: in an AI-driven security landscape, the assumption that "undiscovered equals safe" is obsolete. It underscores the urgent need for continuous, proactive security practices combining AI audits, formal verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

foresightnews_api22m ago

foresightnews_api22m ago

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

**Vitalik Buterin Proposes New DeFi Design to Eliminate Forced Liquidations** Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has published a proposal for a new decentralized finance (DeFi) architecture aimed at removing the automatic liquidation mechanisms prevalent in current lending protocols. The core idea involves creating synthetic assets using options as building blocks, fundamentally avoiding the抵押借贷结构 that triggers forced sell-offs. The proposal responds to a recurring flaw in DeFi: during sharp market downturns, mass自动清算 of under-collateralized positions can exacerbate price declines, creating systemic selling pressure and market instability, as evidenced by recent crypto market volatility. Buterin's model would split an asset like 1 ETH into two option-like derivatives, P and N, pegged to a price index with a set strike price and expiration. At expiry, an oracle determines the settlement price to allocate the underlying ETH between P and N holders. This design eliminates the "cliff" of instant liquidation. Instead, a position's value would gradually drift from its target peg if not actively rebalanced by the user, transferring the rebalancing decision from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on high-frequency, real-time oracle price feeds, which are vulnerable to manipulation and errors in current systems. The delayed settlement in the options model allows for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. However, significant challenges remain for practical adoption. High transaction costs (slippage) from frequent rebalancing on automated market makers (AMMs) could erode user funds. The model may not be suitable for stablecoins requiring a strict 1:1 dollar peg, as it inherently allows for value drift. Success would depend on developing new liquidity provisioning models and deep markets for these synthetic assets. The proposal represents a fundamental rethinking of DeFi risk management, challenging the industry to explore alternatives to被动集中平仓 rather than merely optimizing existing liquidation processes. It remains a theoretical framework awaiting implementation and testing by development teams.

foresightnews_api25m ago

foresightnews_api25m ago

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

Title: The Decline of Bitcoin Marks the Transformation of Crypto While Bitcoin's price recently fell below $70,000, down approximately 45% from its peak, the broader crypto industry is not following it into decline. Instead, crypto is maturing and evolving beyond its dependence on Bitcoin's price movements. Two of Bitcoin's core functions are being usurped. First, AI has captured its role as the primary speculative asset. AI, with its tangible revenue, explosive demand, and massive capital inflows ($700-830 billion in 2024), is siphoning off the speculative "hot money" that once drove Bitcoin. It also contributes to a sustained high-interest-rate environment, further tightening liquidity for assets like Bitcoin. Second, dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDC and USDT have replaced Bitcoin as the crypto market's foundational currency and primary on/off-ramp. Most trading pairs and on-chain transactions are now settled in stablecoins, severing the historical link where all capital inflows had to pass through Bitcoin first. This decoupling allows projects to thrive based on their own fundamentals rather than Bitcoin's price. Examples include Hyperliquid, an on-chain derivatives exchange with annual revenues of $8-13 billion, and prediction market platform Polymarket, valued at $200 billion with $3.65 billion in annual fees. These projects are evaluated on traditional metrics like revenue and user growth. New opportunities are emerging, particularly around privacy. Privacy coins like Zcash (ZEC) are seeing surging demand, while infrastructure like NEAR enables private, cross-chain asset transfers without requiring users to hold a specific token—privacy becomes a universal service layer. In this new paradigm, stablecoins are the universal cash, various project tokens represent equity, and privacy-enabled cross-chain coordination layers (like NEAR) act as the critical infrastructure connecting a fragmented, multi-chain ecosystem. Bitcoin is now just one asset among many. The era where the entire crypto market moved in lockstep with Bitcoin is over. The industry's health should now be judged by project fundamentals—real revenue, active users, and tokenomics that capture value—and the development of the underlying infrastructure enabling a mature, dollar-denominated crypto economy.

foresightnews_api28m ago

foresightnews_api28m ago

After being noticed by IBM, the token of three.ws surged 50 times

IBM's public acknowledgment and collaboration with Solana AI project three.ws sparked a massive 50x surge in its $THREE token. Three.ws is building a "3D Agent Layer" for the internet, aiming to move AI beyond chat interfaces into interactive 3D digital characters that can be embedded on websites. These agents possess bodies (3D models), brains (LLMs), memory, skills, and optional on-chain identities and wallets for payments. The platform's architecture consists of four layers: a Viewer layer for 3D rendering, an Agent layer for AI behavior and skills, an optional Identity layer for persistent profiles, and an Embedding layer for deployment. For monetization, developers can set per-use fees for agent interactions, paid in USDC via the x402 protocol. Key to its enterprise strategy are partnerships with IBM and AWS. Integration with AWS Marketplace provides enterprise billing and deployment channels, while the IBM collaboration aims to combine three.ws's 3D agents with IBM's enterprise AI, cloud services, and Granite models. The challenge remains whether businesses will adopt these embodied AI agents and what utility the $THREE token will ultimately hold within the ecosystem.

foresightnews_api29m ago

foresightnews_api29m ago

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

A decade from now, Bitcoin will function like TCP/IP — invisible yet foundational, supporting trillions in daily transactions globally, according to Lightspark CEO David Marcus. In this future, a coffee shop in Lagos receives instant payment, a manufacturer in São Paulo settles an invoice with a supplier in Ho Chi Minh City, and a freelancer in Bangalore gets paid weekly from an Austin startup — all via Bitcoin's settlement layer, with none of the parties consciously interacting with it. This vision parallels the adoption of open protocols: first driven by necessity where existing systems fail, then scaling rapidly as tools mature and economic benefits become clear. The structural shift begins with wallets. Modern non-custodial wallets, like Spark, allow users to hold dollars, local currency, and Bitcoin in a single address, seamlessly switching between them. This eliminates friction and revolutionizes global custody, moving significant deposits to user-controlled keys not by ideology, but by superior utility. As a result, Bitcoin becomes the default savings layer for billions, as its fixed supply and appreciating value make it a rational choice for savers holding it alongside stablecoins in their everyday wallets. Businesses follow a similar path, from small companies in emerging markets to multinational corporations, holding Bitcoin alongside operational stablecoins. The latest trend is direct Bitcoin transactions for commerce. When both parties hold Bitcoin, transacting in it becomes the simplest option — no conversions, no intermediary currency. This starts in niche areas like high-value B2B settlements but grows as infrastructure makes sending Bitcoin as easy as stablecoins. An accelerating force is AI agents. By 2036, AI agents conducting commerce on behalf of individuals and firms will increasingly choose Bitcoin for settlement. Optimizing for speed, finality, and minimal counterparty risk across jurisdictions, they find Bitcoin's global, neutral, and programmable network ideal for netting and settling obligations. Thus, Bitcoin is becoming the native currency for machine commerce, just as it has become a native savings asset for humans. The global monetary system is being rebuilt from the protocol layer: open infrastructure, default self-custody, Bitcoin settling everything underneath, with stablecoins as the interface. Most users won't think about Bitcoin when they transact — and they won't need to.

foresightnews_api32m ago

foresightnews_api32m ago

Hot Articles

Hot Tokens Learning Week 7: Privacy Coins Rally in Rotation, with RIVER Standing Out as 2026’s Surprise Performer

The privacy + payments narrative has been the primary catalyst driving rotation and substantial price gains in privacy coins such as DASH and XMR.

16.6k Total ViewsPublished 2026.01.20Updated 2026.01.20

Hot Tokens Learning Week 8: ADA's Ouroboros Leios Mainnet Expected to Launch in 2026

ADA's Ouroboros Leios mainnet is expected to launch in 2026, and the hard fork to Protocol Version 11 is planned for Q1 2026.

40.5k Total ViewsPublished 2026.02.10Updated 2026.02.12

Hot Tokens Learning Week 14: Glamsterdam Set to Be Ethereum's Most Closely Watched Upgrade in 2026

Ordinals/Runes continue to drive block fee revenue and developer activity, and are seen as the starting point for Bitcoin's "native asset issuance".

26.7k Total ViewsPublished 2026.04.29Updated 2026.04.29