Is Ethereum the ‘one common blockchain’? BlackRock CEO weighs in

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-23Обновлено 2026-01-23

Введение

The 2025 cycle marked a shift toward institutional crypto adoption, largely driven by the utility-driven Real World Asset (RWA) sector. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink endorsed tokenization as necessary and pointed to Ethereum as the natural platform for this shift, calling it the potential "one common blockchain." Ethereum dominates the RWA market with a 60% share of the $22.6 billion sector, significantly ahead of competitors like Binance Smart Chain. Key institutional products, such as BlackRock's $1.5 billion BUIDL token and JPMorgan's MONY token, are built on Ethereum. Furthermore, Ethereum's major upgrades have driven gas fees to multi-year lows (0.5 Gwei) while increasing on-chain activity and new wallet adoption, validating its institutional use case for cost-efficient tokenized assets.

It’s not a stretch to say the 2025 cycle marked a shift toward “institutionalization.” Sure, while ETF launches in 2024 helped establish credibility and access, they alone didn’t drive meaningful adoption.

Instead, adoption really accelerated once “utility-driven” assets moved on-chain. In that context, the Real World Asset (RWA) sector has clearly become the core engine powering institutional participation.

Backing this, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has called tokenization necessary and pointed to Ethereum [ETH] as the natural platform for it. The question, then, is whether this is merely theoretical or a case that holds real weight.

‘One Common Blockchain’ vision centers on Ethereum

A statement from a major firm like BlackRock was bound to create a stir.

At the World Economic Forum, CEO Larry Fink emphasized the need for rapid adoption of tokenization, highlighting India and Brazil as two developing nations already leading the way with tokenized currencies.

However, the real buzz came when Fink mentioned the “One Common Blockchain” to drive this shift. Naturally, market participants started asking which blockchain would fit the vision, with many pointing to Ethereum.

Looking at the numbers, the hypotheticals actually hold weight.

For instance, Ethereum leads the RWA sector, controlling roughly 60% of the total $22.6 billion RWA market. By comparison, Binance Smart Chain [BSC] comes in second with just 10.2%, underscoring ETH’s dominance.

On top of that, BlackRock’s token, BUIDL, has crossed $1.5 billion on Ethereum, while JPMorgan’s MONY token has officially launched, further reinforcing Fink’s narrative about ETH as the platform for tokenization.

Given this, along with Ethereum’s RWA dominance and the broader trend of institutionalization, it’s easy to see why CEO Larry’s view that ETH could become the “one common blockchain” for tokenized assets holds weight.

Still, at a fundamental level, what does this development actually mean?

Fee falls, activity rises: ETH proves its institutional case

Larry Fink has repeatedly emphasized one key aspect: Fees.

In contrast to TradFi, where buying an asset comes with platform fees, broker commissions, and other costs, purchasing tokenized assets costs much less. As Fink points out, this could become a major differentiator.

Given that, the question naturally arises: Does Ethereum deliver on this promise? Even though prices have lagged, 2025 has pushed ETH forward at a fundamental level through its back-to-back major on-chain upgrades.

The result? Average gas price has dropped to a multi-year low of 0.5 Gwei.

At the same time, Glassnode’s latest report shows a sharp spike in Month-over-Month Activity Retention, meaning transactions are rising even as gas fees fall, bringing new wallets onto the network.

In this context, Ethereum’s upgrades are doing more than improving technology. Instead, they’re driving real adoption, which makes Larry Fink’s take on ETH as the “one common blockchain” much more tangible.

Hence, its dominance in RWA is becoming a major institutional bull case.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum leads the $22.6 billion RWA market (60% share), backed by BlackRock and JPMorgan initiatives.
  • Lower gas fees and rising adoption reinforce Ethereum’s role as the “one common blockchain.”

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did BlackRock CEO Larry Fink identify as the 'natural platform' for tokenization?

ALarry Fink pointed to Ethereum (ETH) as the natural platform for tokenization.

QWhat is the total value of the Real World Asset (RWA) market and what percentage of it does Ethereum control?

AThe total RWA market is valued at $22.6 billion, and Ethereum controls roughly 60% of it.

QWhat is the name of BlackRock's token on the Ethereum blockchain and what milestone has it reached?

ABlackRock's token is called BUIDL, and it has crossed $1.5 billion on the Ethereum blockchain.

QAccording to the article, what key differentiator for tokenized assets did Larry Fink emphasize in contrast to traditional finance (TradFi)?

ALarry Fink emphasized that purchasing tokenized assets costs much less than in TradFi, where there are platform fees, broker commissions, and other costs.

QWhat fundamental change to the Ethereum network has occurred in 2025 that supports its institutional case?

AThe average gas price on Ethereum has dropped to a multi-year low of 0.5 Gwei, while on-chain activity and transactions have been rising.

Похожее

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit16 мин. назад

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit16 мин. назад

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ONE

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Harmony (ONE) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Harmony (ONE).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Harmony (ONE)После приобретения вами Harmony (ONE) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Harmony (ONE)С легкостью торгуйте Harmony (ONE) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

612 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.04.12Обновлено 2025.06.06

Как купить ONE

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ONE (ONE) представлены ниже.

活动图片