Interpreting Polymarket's Major Updates Last Night: Expanded Fees, Self-Regulation, and New Incentives

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

Polymarket, a prediction market platform, announced a series of major updates focused on self-regulation, fee expansion, and new incentive mechanisms. Key updates include enhanced market integrity rules explicitly prohibiting insider trading, market manipulation, and trading by entities capable of influencing event results. This aims to increase transparency and build regulatory trust. A new dynamic fee structure will be implemented starting March 30, 2026, expanding beyond Crypto and Sports to include Finance, Politics, Economics, Culture, and Weather. Fees peak when contract prices are near 50% probability. The platform also opened its referral program to all users with over $10k in trading volume, offering a 30% fee rebate for direct referrals and 10% for secondary ones. Additionally, a market maker rebate program was launched, redistributing a portion of taker fees to liquidity providers daily in USDC, with rebate rates varying by market. While the community anticipated a token airdrop, the announced updates are seen as long-term operational improvements, with overall positive sentiment.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Asher (@Asher_ 0210)

Last Saturday, Mustafa, a member of the Polymarket official team, posted on X platform that major news would be announced on Monday.

Activity of Polymarket official team member last weekend

As expected, Polymarket official released multiple major updates from last night to today. Next, Odaily Planet Daily will break them down for you one by one.

Updated Market Integrity Rules: Anti-Insider Trading, Anti-Manipulation

Last night, Polymarket announced updates to its market integrity rules for both its DeFi platform and its CFTC-regulated US exchange, further clarifying regulatory requirements regarding insider trading and market manipulation. Neal Kumar, Chief Legal Officer of Polymarket, stated: "Market prosperity relies on transparency. The refinement of these rules makes our expectations for all participants on both platforms clear and highlights the compliance infrastructure we have established. As Polymarket continues to grow, we will continue to solidify our foundation, ensuring our markets achieve their greatest strength—revealing the truth—through clear communication with users."

The new rules detail three types of prohibited behaviors, specifically including:

  • Trading using non-public information: If a participant possesses confidential information about the outcome or potential outcome of the subject event, and using this information would violate a pre-existing duty of trust or confidence owed to another person or entity, the participant must not trade any contracts.
  • Building positions based on illegal information sources: Participants must not trade using confidential information provided to them by others if the information was provided by someone who owes a pre-existing duty of trust or confidence to another, and the participant knows or has reason to know that the person providing the information would themselves be prohibited from using it for trading;
  • Entities with the ability to influence event outcomes participating in trading: If a participant has sufficient authority or influence to affect the outcome of the subject event, they must not participate in trading any contracts.

Simultaneously, the platform explicitly prohibits behaviors such as wash trading, matched orders, and price manipulation, and has launched a dedicated page to explain the rules and provide a channel for reporting anomalous behavior. Furthermore, Polymarket stated that its DeFi platform identifies risks through on-chain transparency mechanisms and a multi-layer monitoring system, while its US platform combines technical monitoring with collaboration from industry regulators to investigate and penalize violations.

This round of rule updates essentially redefines the market boundaries of Polymarket: which information can be traded, and which behaviors are directly excluded. Surrounding insider information, information sources, and the ability to influence event outcomes, the platform has turned previously ambiguous gray areas into clear "no-go" red lines, while simultaneously introducing monitoring and reporting mechanisms to bring trading behavior into a more traceable framework.

More importantly, this points to a change in the platform's positioning. Polymarket is shifting from the external perception of a "high-risk gambling arena" towards emphasizing information pricing and transparency as market infrastructure. By proactively strengthening compliance and rule expression, it aims to gain trust at the regulatory and public levels, laying the groundwork for subsequent broader expansion.

The Era of "Big Fees" Arrives: Fees Applied to All Except Geopolitical Events

According to the latest official Polymarket documentation, the platform will adjust its fee mechanism starting March 30, 2026. Building on the current Crypto and Sports categories, it will add multiple market categories such as Finance, Politics, Economics, Culture, Weather, etc., into the scope of taker fee charges.

The new fee rate is calculated using a dynamic formula directly related to price intervals. Overall, the new fee structure shows a distribution of "high in the middle, low at the ends": when the price is close to a 50% probability, the effective rate peaks, while in extreme intervals near 0% or 100%, the fee significantly decreases, potentially even being rounded down to 0 for very small trades.

Under the current fee system, the peak effective rate for Crypto markets is about 1.56%, and for Sports about 0.44%. In the new fee structure about to take effect, the differences between categories are further widened. For example, Crypto peaks at about 1.80%, Finance and Politics at about 1.00%, and Economics can reach 1.50%. Simultaneously, the corresponding maker rebate ratios for various categories are also set, e.g., Finance is as high as 50%, with most other categories around 25%.

The fee calculation is based on a unified formula, dynamically calculated by combining trade shares, price, and different market parameters. Fees are denominated in USDC but are charged in "share form" for buy orders and deducted in USDC for sell orders.

New fee charging standards for various markets

Not News Related to Financing or Token Airdrops, But Opening a Referral Program

This morning, Polymarket posted on X platform announcing that the referral program has been expanded from the internal testing phase to all traders with a trading volume exceeding $10, 000. Eligible users can receive rewards proportional to the trading volume of the new users they refer. Specific invitation details are as follows:

  • 30% fee rebate from direct referrals, 10% fee rebate from secondary referrals (rewards will be valid for the first 180 days after the user registers with Polymarket, this period may be subject to change without notice);
  • Fee rebate rewards are distributed daily (UTC);
  • Rewards are uncapped; the more your referred users trade on the platform, the more you earn.

Polymarket invitation interface

Launch of Market Maker Rebate Program

In addition to opening the referral program, to incentivize continuous and competitive quoting, thereby providing a better trading experience for all traders, Polymarket has launched a market maker rebate program. Specifically, this mechanism redistributes a portion of the taker fees to liquidity providers (market makers), effectively redistributing trading costs among market participants.

Rebates are settled and distributed daily in USDC. Only successfully placed orders that are executed contribute to the allocation. The overall profit is not a fixed value but is calculated based on the proportion of liquidity contribution in the actual executed trades. The more trades executed and the higher the contribution, the corresponding rebate received is greater.

In terms of allocation logic, the system calculates the "fee equivalent value" for each executed trade, synthesizing the executed quantity, price, and fee parameters of different markets, and aggregates this within the same market. The final rebate is allocated according to each market maker's contribution share, meaning competition exists not only in whether the quote is executed but also in the price range of the quote and the fee contribution it brings. Overall, this rebate comes from the taker-paid fees, with varying rebate ratios across different markets, e.g., Crypto is 20%, Finance can be 50%, and most categories are around 25%.

Rebate ratio situation across markets

No Information on Token Airdrops, But Overall Community Sentiment is Optimistic

Although the community previously anticipated that the "major news" might point to a token or airdrop, what ultimately materialized was a combination of updates to fees, rebates, and the referral system. Looking at the outcome, this mechanism leans more towards long-term incentive design rather than a one-time release of expectations. However, sentiment did not cool down because of this; instead, with clear, actionable paths for participation, the overall feedback from the trading community has been positive.

Many users already see the referral program as a "de facto airdrop entry," especially KOLs with their own traffic or community resources, who have noticeably increased their sharing efforts, with some even treating it as a long-term income stream; after the market maker rebate went live, feedback from the LP side was also direct, with more people reassessing their market making strategies, showing a clear increase in willingness to participate.

In contrast, arbitrage traders and those scanning for end-of-market opportunities are calmer. With the arrival of the new fee rules, some previously viable arbitrage spaces will be compressed, strategies need recalculation, and trading rhythms consequently tend to收敛 (converge, become more conservative), relying more on precise execution and cost control.

However, after Polymarket and Kalshi came under regulatory scrutiny, their valuations in the coming period will likely be worn down by policy tensions. (Related news:US lawmakers to propose bipartisan bill banning sports predictions on prediction markets like Polymarket)

Related Questions

QWhat are the three main types of prohibited behaviors under Polymarket's updated market integrity rules?

AThe three main types of prohibited behaviors are: 1. Trading using non-public information that violates a pre-existing duty of trust. 2. Trading based on illegal information sources, if the participant knows the provider of the information was themselves prohibited from using it. 3. Participating in any contract if the participant has the authority or influence to affect the outcome of the event.

QWhen will Polymarket's new fee mechanism take effect, and what is the major change?

AThe new fee mechanism will take effect on March 30, 2026. The major change is the expansion of the taker fee to cover multiple new market categories beyond just Crypto and Sports, including Finance, Politics, Economics, Culture, and Weather.

QWhat is the purpose of Polymarket's newly launched Market Maker Rebate Program?

AThe purpose of the Market Maker Rebate Program is to incentivize continuous and competitive quoting by redistributing a portion of the taker fees back to the market makers who provide liquidity, thereby improving the overall trading experience for all participants.

QWho is eligible to participate in Polymarket's newly expanded Referral Program?

AThe Referral Program has been expanded to all traders with a trading volume exceeding $10,000.

QHow does the new dynamic fee structure work in terms of the relationship between price and the fee rate?

AThe new fee structure features a 'middle high, ends low' distribution. The effective fee rate peaks when the price is near a 50% probability and decreases significantly as the price approaches 0% or 100%, with very small trades potentially being rounded down to a fee of 0.

Related Reads

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

At the 2026 Huawei Cloud INSPIRE Creator Conference, CEO Zhou Yuefeng outlined Huawei Cloud's distinct strategy in the competitive AI cloud market. Instead of engaging in price wars based on token volume or Maas revenue—a common focus for rivals like Alibaba Cloud and ByteDance's Volcano Engine—Huawei Cloud is shifting the competition towards real-world productivity gains. Zhou highlighted three core differentiators: a fully domestic computing stack (Ascend, Kunpeng), a focus on government and enterprise clients rather than consumer internet, and a deep commitment to open-source ecosystems. To this end, Huawei Cloud launched a suite of new products under the "Agentic Infra" paradigm, including the AICS Lingqu computing cluster, AMS memory storage, and the ModelArts Next platform. These aim to solve enterprise challenges in deploying AI agents, such as latency, memory, scheduling, and security. The strategy further involves creating specialized industry zones ("AI Dream Factories") for sectors like healthcare and embodied intelligence. For example, a smart medical zone developed with Shanghai Ruijin Hospital aims to democratize expert-level diagnostic capabilities. In essence, Huawei Cloud is positioning itself not as a commodity token provider, but as the foundational infrastructure for industrial AI, leveraging its domestic supply chain and hybrid cloud solutions to serve sectors where productivity, not just scale, is the ultimate measure of value.

marsbit3m ago

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

marsbit3m ago

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

70% of Americans believe AI development is moving too fast, with growing public resistance evolving from online criticism to real-world protests and violence. This widespread anti-AI sentiment stems from fears of job losses, rising utility costs, environmental damage, threats to democracy, and financial instability. Key incidents illustrate the backlash: Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt was loudly booed at a graduation for promoting AI; AI company ads are vandalized; protests and even violent attacks target AI firms and data centers. Polls show deep public pessimism and strong local opposition to data center construction, often surpassing resistance to nuclear power plants. The core grievances are economic and practical: AI is seen as automating jobs, concentrating wealth, and increasing household electricity and water bills due to massive data center resource demands. Environmentalists also oppose AI's high energy use and carbon emissions. This opposition has turned AI into a major political issue in the US. While the Trump administration prioritizes AI innovation for global competition, bipartisan pushback is growing. Democrats and factions within the MAGA movement are forming temporary alliances to support stricter regulations and local bans on new data centers, pressuring the administration to choose between its tech industry backers and its voter base. The situation highlights a profound national divide over AI's future.

marsbit37m ago

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

marsbit37m ago

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

In the race to dominate the AI era's entry point, China's tech giants—Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba—are aggressively deploying AI Agents to control the future of traffic distribution. Alibaba is pursuing a dual-track "closed loop + openness" strategy. Its Qianwen app is evolving into a super-Agent integrated across its ecosystem (Taobao, Alipay, etc.) to handle complex tasks like travel planning. Concurrently, it is opening its platform to external brands (Luckin Coffee, KFC) and has launched a B2B Agent platform, "Wukong," targeting enterprise automation. Its other flagship, Quark, aims to be an "AI super search box" for information and tasks. ByteDance is executing an omnipresent "sprawl strategy." Its Doubao app boasts over 300 million monthly active users and is evolving into a default AI entry point for daily life, with plans for paid versions and e-commerce integration. Its core weapon is the Kouzi platform, a visual "AI assembly factory" for developers to build custom Agents. ByteDance is also pushing hardware integration, collaborating on AI phones and developing smart glasses to embed Doubao everywhere. Tencent is playing its long-held "ultimate card" by quietly embedding an AI Agent directly into WeChat. This Agent, accessible via a swipe, can understand user commands and automatically execute tasks by calling upon WeChat's millions of mini-programs (e.g., finding and ordering coffee). This leverages WeChat's unparalleled 1.4-billion-user ecosystem to position the app as an AI-powered "service operating system," a move that could dramatically reshape the competitive landscape. The core battleground is shifting from competing for "user screen time" to competing to be the "default execution layer" for user intent. The business model is evolving from an "attention economy" to an "intent economy," where the Agent that can most efficiently fulfill a user's need gains control over service access and token flow. This represents a fundamental change in how users connect with digital services, making the fight for the Agent入口 (entry point) a pivotal moment for redefining industry leadership in the AI age.

marsbit2h ago

Agents Take Over Traffic Distribution Power: What Are Tencent, ByteDance, and Alibaba Competing For?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片