Hyperliquid jumps 5% – Why traders still don’t trust HYPE’s reversal

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

Hyperliquid (HYPE) gained 5.15% in 24 hours with a 53.6% surge in trading volume, showing relative strength while Bitcoin hovered below $90k and altcoins stagnated. Despite the bounce, the longer-term trend remains bearish since October. Key Fibonacci resistance levels are at $23.97 and $24.92, with a break above $26.13 needed to signal a bullish reversal. Short-term momentum indicators show signs of easing bearish pressure, but traders remain cautious. Liquidation clusters suggest possible price moves toward $24.5 or $26.3–$26.6 to the upside, or $22.1 to the downside. High volatility is expected, and the overall advice is to wait for clearer signals before trading.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] rallied 5.15% in the past 24 hours and saw its daily trading volume increase by 53.6%, at press time. This came at a time when Bitcoin [BTC] was hovering just below the psychological $90k resistance.

Many of the major altcoins were experiencing a short-term downtrend due to the price action of the past week. Bitcoin meandered between $88.7k and $90.3k, and the altcoin market cap, excluding Ethereum [ETH], has also been moving sideways in the past five days.

Hence, the HYPE gains since Friday have been particularly interesting.

Should investors expect a trend reversal?

On the 4-hour timeframe, the plunge from $26.13 to $20.48 last week showed that investors should not be looking to buy just yet. The swing structure was bearish. Zooming out, even the 3-day chart showed a bearish trend since October.

The findings confirm that HYPE’s longer‐term trend remains bearish. Recent gains reflect a price bounce toward key Fibonacci retracement levels, with short‐term bullish targets at $23.97 and $24.92.

A break above $26.13 would be required to shift the swing structure into bullish territory. Meanwhile, the Awesome Oscillator signaled a momentum shift on the 4‐hour chart, and the DMI suggested last week’s downtrend is beginning to ease.

Arguing the bearish case

It is possible that the 50% retracement level at $23.31 rebuffs HYPE bulls. The past two weekends saw sideways price action for Bitcoin and most altcoins, with the early hours of Monday bringing high volatility.

It is possible that such volatility would drag HYPE prices lower, but this scenario appeared less likely.

Why traders must wait to sell the bounce

The 2-week liquidation heatmap showed a dense cluster of short liquidations around $24.5. Another magnetic zone was at $26.3-$26.6. To the south, the $22.1 area was a potential short-term liquidity target.

This meant that traders can wait for HYPE to sweep these liquidity targets. A lower timeframe bearish trend shift from these areas of interest would align with the higher timeframe downtrend, giving short sellers opportunities.


Final Thoughts

  • The Hyperliquid price gains in the past 24 hours signaled relative strength against the wider market, which was stagnant.
  • Monday could bring high volatility, and traders should also remember that the higher timeframe HYPE trend was bearish.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage increase in Hyperliquid's [HYPE] price and trading volume in the past 24 hours?

AHyperliquid's price rallied 5.15% and its daily trading volume increased by 53.6% in the past 24 hours.

QAccording to the article, what price level must HYPE break above to shift its swing structure into bullish territory?

AA break above $26.13 would be required to shift HYPE's swing structure into bullish territory.

QWhat does the 2-week liquidation heatmap show for HYPE around the $24.5 price area?

AThe 2-week liquidation heatmap showed a dense cluster of short liquidations around the $24.5 price area.

QWhy does the article suggest that HYPE's recent gains are particularly interesting?

AThe gains are particularly interesting because they occurred while the broader altcoin market, excluding Ethereum, was moving sideways and many major altcoins were experiencing a short-term downtrend.

QWhat is the overall, longer-term trend for HYPE according to the price analysis in the article?

AThe article states that HYPE's longer-term trend remains bearish, based on the analysis of its price action since October.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit24m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit24m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit34m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit34m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片