How to View the Divergence Between Gold and Oil Prices?

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-23Last updated on 2026-03-23

Abstract

The article analyzes the divergence between gold and oil prices following the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran war. While oil prices surged significantly, gold experienced a decline, contrary to expectations given its traditional role as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical crises. Gold serves three primary hedging functions: against geopolitical risk, inflation risk, and U.S. dollar risk. Since late 2023, gold had been in a strong bull market, rising from $1,800 to over $5,000, driven by simultaneous geopolitical tensions (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war, Middle East conflicts), inflationary pressures, and a weakening dollar due to the Fed's premature rate cuts. However, after the U.S. "decapitation" strike on Iran, gold prices fell sharply. This was attributed to two main factors: a shift of capital from gold to oil, as investors repositioned portfolios to capitalize on rising oil prices, and a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets that forced large-scale sell-offs of gold—a highly liquid asset—to meet redemption demands. More critically, growing pessimism about a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict raised fears of sustained high oil prices, potential global economic disruption, and a possible reversal of Fed monetary policy (delayed cuts or even renewed hikes). This expectation of tighter policy caused gold’s dollar-related hedging function to reverse, overwhelming its geopolitical and inflation hedging roles and leading to a severe correction. Oil prices also experienced volatility...

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, as two commodities highly correlated with geopolitics, crude oil and gold have shown completely different trends: the former has risen sharply, while the latter has fallen slightly. Why is this?

As a natural currency, gold has three major hedging functions: hedging against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks. The price of gold is simultaneously influenced by these three forces, thus playing varying degrees of hedging roles at different stages.

Since the end of 2023, precious metals have experienced a super bull market, with the price of gold soaring from $1,800 to over $5,000. The reason for such strong upward momentum is that gold simultaneously served as a hedge against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks.

In October 2023, on top of the Russia-Ukraine war, large-scale conflicts broke out between Israel and Palestine, plunging the Middle East into turmoil. In 2024, the Red Sea crisis erupted, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was blockaded. In 2025, Trump took office, and the international order became precarious. These are all manifestations of chaotic geopolitical situations, providing strong support for the price of gold.

On the other hand, in 2023, the US economy shifted from overheating to stagflation. By 2024, influenced by political factors, the Federal Reserve boldly initiated an interest rate-cutting cycle before inflation issue was fully resolved, leading to a resurgence of US dollar liquidity. On one hand, there was mid-cycle easing, and on the other, the risk of secondary inflation. Gold simultaneously served as a hedge against US dollar risks and inflation risks, fueling the takeoff of gold prices.

With all three hedging functions in place, how could the price of gold not rise? In addition, benefiting from the Federal Reserve's easing cycle, both emerging and developed markets, whether in A-shares or US stocks, experienced a bull market.

Now, regarding oil prices, last year's average oil price was significantly lower than the previous year. This was because after Trump took office, he persuaded OPEC to significantly increase crude oil production in an attempt to force Russia to make concessions at the negotiating table. This strategy initially worked, with Putin repeatedly softening his stance on peace talks. If not for the US-Iran war, it was expected that Russia and Ukraine would sign a ceasefire agreement in the first half of this year.

Since the outbreak of the Middle East war, the prices of gold and oil have experienced multiple fluctuations, with their trends diverging due to different causes.

For gold, in mid-to-late January (half a month before the war), as the probability of a US-Iran conflict continued to rise, the price of gold increased, reflecting its geopolitical hedging attribute. According to the market's mainstream expectations at the time, this conflict might be similar to last year's "Midnight Hammer" operation, with a short duration, making it more of a temporary trend.

After the US carried out a "decapitation" strike on Iran, the price of gold rebounded briefly but soon plummeted. This was because the main force shifted from gold to crude oil. Due to the excessive concentration of gold holdings earlier, the main funds chose to sell gold to obtain liquidity for going long on crude oil. In other words, the "position switching" from gold to crude oil led to a fall in gold and a rise in oil.

On the other hand, as overseas markets began to price in a prolonged US-Iran war, risk assets such as US stocks came under pressure, triggering a wave of redemptions. The US financial market faced a liquidity crisis, and as an asset with liquidity second only to cash, gold was heavily sold. In other words, the selling pressure on gold in early March was not because international investors were bearish on gold but rather a self-preservation strategy amid the liquidity crisis.

If it were just a liquidity crisis, the price of gold would often form a "deep V" trend, providing buying opportunities. However, the more troublesome part came later. Since mid-March, overseas expectations for the US-Iran conflict have become more pessimistic, with concerns not only about the potential long-term blockade of the strait but also about the possibility of warring parties launching large-scale attacks on each other's energy facilities. This would keep oil prices at relatively high levels for an extended period, dealing a devastating blow to the global economy and even causing the collapse of the international order. In such a scenario, the Federal Reserve might delay its interest rate-cutting pace or even restart a rate-hiking cycle as it did in 2022. Based on this expectation, the price of gold plummeted, with the extent of the correction breaking the highest record in recent years.

In other words, gold's geopolitical hedging function is still at play, but the current sharp decline in gold prices is driven by expectations of a reversal in the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. The US dollar anti-hedging attribute of gold has overshadowed its geopolitical and inflation hedging attributes, becoming its main driver. Compared to previous declines, the fundamentals of gold have changed. It is no longer a liquidity crisis or profit-taking but rather overseas concerns about the tightening of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. These concerns are also reflected in risk assets such as A-shares and US stocks, as no one is spared when disaster strikes.

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, oil prices have also experienced twists and turns. The reason for this volatility is that overseas investors' perception of geopolitics has deviated. After the "decapitation" strike, oil prices continued to rise, reaching nearly $120 per barrel. However, in early March, as Trump hinted that "the war will end soon," the market began executing "TACO" trades, believing that the Iran situation might ease, and oil prices once plummeted by 30%. However, unlike tariff issues, the initiative in a geopolitical crisis does not lie with Trump. He cannot extricate himself easily while the strait is blockaded. Eventually, the market corrected its expectations for oil, and prices returned to an upward trend.

On geopolitical issues, the market sometimes makes misjudgments, but such pricing deviations are not necessarily bad. A drop in oil prices can反而 provide opportunities to add positions, making it easier for latecomers to enter the market.

Looking ahead, the trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace of the US-Iran conflict. If it evolves into a prolonged war like the Russia-Ukraine conflict, gold may lack配置 value in the first half of the year, and in the short term, one might focus on the energy chain. However, the situation could still reverse. The US-Iran war may reach a critical turning point, which will determine whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term. It all depends on Trump's choice.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what are the three main safe-haven functions of gold?

AThe three main safe-haven functions of gold are: hedging against geopolitical risks, hedging against inflation risks, and hedging against U.S. dollar risks.

QWhat event in 2025 is mentioned as a factor contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation that supported gold prices?

ADonald Trump taking office in 2025 is mentioned as a factor that made the international order precarious, contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation.

QWhy did the price of gold fall sharply after the U.S. 'decapitation' strike on Iran, as explained in the article?

AThe price fell because major funds switched from gold to crude oil, selling gold to obtain liquidity for oil positions. Additionally, a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets led to large-scale selling as gold is a highly liquid asset.

QWhat was the main reason for the significant drop in gold prices from mid-March onwards, according to the analysis?

AThe main reason was the market's expectation that the Federal Reserve might delay interest rate cuts or even restart a rate hike cycle due to concerns that the U.S.-Iran conflict could keep oil prices high and severely impact the global economy.

QWhat does the article suggest is the key factor that will determine the future trends of gold and oil prices?

AThe future trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace and development of the U.S.-Iran conflict, specifically whether it becomes a protracted war like in Ukraine and the critical issue of whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term.

Related Reads

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit21m ago

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit21m ago

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手37m ago

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手37m ago

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit37m ago

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit37m ago

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy WAR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing WAR (WAR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy WAR (WAR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your WAR (WAR)After purchasing your WAR (WAR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade WAR (WAR)Easily trade WAR (WAR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy WAR

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of WAR (WAR) are presented below.

活动图片