Here’s why Stellar’s (XLM) price action may be at the risk of a 28% drop

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-28Last updated on 2026-02-28

Abstract

Amid escalating U.S.-Iran tensions and broader crypto market pressure, Stellar (XLM) is showing signs of a potential 28% price decline. A bearish head-and-shoulders pattern has formed below the $0.158 support level. If XLM closes below $0.145, it could drop to $0.105. Despite the price fall, trading volume increased by 17%. Key support levels are identified at $0.147, $0.078, and $0.041. The ADX indicator suggests strong downward momentum. Derivatives data shows bearish dominance with $1.49M in short positions versus $296K in longs, though exchange outflows hint at possible long-term accumulation. Short-term bearish sentiment prevails, but a buying opportunity may emerge longer-term.

As tensions between the United States and Iran escalate, the broader crypto market has come under significant pressure. Amid this uncertainty, Stellar (XLM) seems to be opening the door for further downside momentum.

However, XLM is not being driven by geopolitical tensions alone. Instead, they’ve been accompanied by the formation of a bearish price pattern on the chart.

On 28 February, XLM fell by over 9.95% in just 24 hours, with the altcoin valued at $0.1486 on the charts. Despite the price drop though, trader and investor participation increased notably. This was reflected in the trading volume which jumped by 17% to $125.89 million.

XLM price action and key levels to watch

Despite market uncertainty, popular crypto analyst Ali Martinez recently shared a post on X highlighting key support levels for XLM. In the post, the expert noted that $0.147, $0.078, and $0.041 are key levels for the altcoin.

Additionallt, if we look at the daily chart, it would seem that XLM’s price has formed a bearish head-and-shoulders pattern below the key support level of $0.158.

Based on the price action, if XLM’s downside momentum continues and it closes a daily candle below the $0.145-level, it could see a further price decline of 28% and may reach the $0.105-level in the coming days.

However, XLM’s bearish thesis would only be validated if it closes below the $0.145-level. Otherwise, it would be invalidated.

At press time, the Average Directional Index (ADX), an indicator that measures the strength of a trend, had hit 30.40.

It was above the key threshold of 25 – Indicative of strong momentum in the altcoin’s market.

Derivatives tool flashes mixed sentiments

A look at the market structure also suggested that long-term holders may be seizing this dip as an opportunity. Short-term participants may be following the market trend by betting heavily on short positions too.

According to the derivatives tool Coinglass, intraday traders are strongly betting on $0.149 on the lower side (support) and $0.1619 on the upper side (resistance). They have built $296k worth of long-leveraged positions and $1.49 million worth of short-leveraged positions.

These bets revealed that traders with a bearish view are dominating the current market, believing that XLM’s price will not cross the $0.1619-level anytime soon.

On the other hand, the XLM spot inflow/outflow metric found that a modest $319.79k worth of the asset flowed out of exchanges over the last 24 hours – A sign of potential accumulation.

When combining these metrics, it would seem that XLM is bearish in the short term. In the long term though, an ideal buying opportunity could be on the horizon.


Final Summary

  • Stellar (XLM) is poised for a massive downside move because of escalating geopolitical tensions and formation of a bearish price pattern.
  • XLM could fall another 28% if it fails to hold the $0.145-support level.

Related Questions

QWhat are the key support levels for Stellar (XLM) according to analyst Ali Martinez?

AThe key support levels for XLM are $0.147, $0.078, and $0.041.

QWhat bearish price pattern has XLM's price formed on the daily chart?

AXLM's price has formed a bearish head-and-shoulders pattern below the key support level of $0.158.

QWhat is the potential price target for XLM if it closes below the $0.145-level?

AIf XLM closes below the $0.145-level, it could see a further price decline of 28% and may reach the $0.105-level.

QWhat does the Average Directional Index (ADX) reading of 30.40 indicate about XLM's trend?

AAn ADX reading of 30.40, which is above the key threshold of 25, indicates strong momentum in the altcoin's market.

QWhat do the derivatives data from Coinglass reveal about trader sentiment towards XLM?

AThe data shows that traders with a bearish view are dominating, with $1.49 million worth of short-leveraged positions compared to $296k in long-leveraged positions, indicating they believe the price will not cross the $0.1619 resistance level soon.

Related Reads

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit51m ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit51m ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit1h ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit1h ago

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit1h ago

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片