Hassett: Setting a Six-Month Interest Rate Roadmap 'Irresponsible', Praises Powell's Leadership

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett emphasized that pre-setting a six-month interest rate path would be "irresponsible," advocating instead for data-dependent monetary policy. In a CNBC interview, he praised Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s leadership in building consensus within the FOMC ahead of an expected rate cut. Hassett avoided specifying the number of rate cuts needed, underscoring the importance of flexibility over rigid forward guidance. He also expressed optimism about AI-driven positive supply shocks, similar to the 1990s tech boom, which could allow the economy to run hotter without inflation. Hassett noted improved bond market conditions and downward trends in Treasury yields, reflecting uncertainty around the Fed’s upcoming decision. His comments highlight the need for adaptive, data-driven policymaking in a complex economic environment.

Kevin Hassett, head of the White House National Economic Council, recently shared important views on the Federal Reserve's interest rate path. As a top contender widely seen as the most likely successor to Powell, Hassett clearly stated that pre-setting interest rate targets for the next six months is an irresponsible act, emphasizing the importance of monetary policy decisions strictly following economic data trends.

I. Interest Rate Decisions Should Avoid Mechanical Forward Guidance

Hassett elaborated on his core stance during a Monday interview with CNBC: "The role of the Federal Reserve Chair is to closely track economic data, adjust policies accordingly, and clearly explain the reasoning behind decisions to the public.

Therefore, simply declaring 'I will follow a set plan over the next six months' is highly irresponsible." When asked how many rate cuts might be needed in 2026 to align with economic principles, Hassett avoided giving a specific number.

He stated: "I prefer not to guide market expectations by predicting the number of rate cuts. I believe the only thing policymakers need to do is closely monitor data developments." This statement reflects his policy philosophy of opposing rigid forecasts and advocating flexible responses.

II. Consensus Building and Market Expectations Under Powell's Leadership

Earlier this year, U.S. President Trump repeatedly called publicly for the Fed to cut the benchmark rate below 2%, while the target range was then between 3.75% and 4%. Currently, markets widely expect Powell and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to cut the benchmark rate by another 25 basis points at Wednesday's meeting.

Hassett gave a positive assessment of Powell's work. He believes Powell has "excelled at coordinating differing views within the Committee," laying the groundwork for a consensus on a rate cut this week. Hassett said: "I believe Chairman Powell agrees with me on this point—that we should probably maintain a cautious stance, closely follow the data, and further moderately cut rates." Although FOMC members seem divided on the upcoming decision, Hassett noted that Powell has successfully guided policymakers to align "around" the expectations reflected in futures markets.

As of Monday, futures market data showed a nearly 100% probability of a 25 basis point cut on Wednesday.

III. AI's Supply Shock and New Dynamics in the Bond Market

The White House economic chief reiterated his optimistic view on investments in artificial intelligence. He believes AI investment could replicate the positive supply shock brought by the computer boom of the 1990s, creating policy space for the Fed to "let the economy run hotter."

Hassett analyzed: "If we can recreate the scenario of the 90s, achieving both falling inflation and economic growth driven by a positive supply shock, then the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield has ample room to fall." He also noted that the bond market has "significantly improved" compared to the beginning of the year. He specifically mentioned that Treasury yields have shown a downward trend since early 2025.

Hassett added: "Yields are currently in a state of slight fluctuation, which I think partly reflects market uncertainty about the Fed's specific actions and policy signals at this meeting."

IV. The Era of Data-Driven Decision-Making

Hassett's comments highlight the necessity of data-driven monetary policy in the current global economic environment. By avoiding rigid forward guidance, the Fed can maintain policy flexibility to better respond to changing economic conditions. This cautious approach not only helps stabilize market expectations but also leaves necessary policy space to address potential economic risks.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat did Kevin Hassett say about setting a six-month interest rate roadmap for the Fed?

AKevin Hassett stated that setting a predetermined interest rate roadmap for the next six months would be 'irresponsible' and emphasized that monetary policy decisions should be strictly data-dependent.

QHow did Hassett evaluate Jerome Powell's leadership at the Federal Reserve?

AHassett praised Powell's leadership, noting that he has done a 'great job' building consensus within the committee and aligning policymakers around market expectations.

QWhat is the market expectation for the Fed's interest rate decision at the upcoming FOMC meeting?

AThe market expects the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to cut the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points at the upcoming meeting, with futures markets pricing in a nearly 100% probability of such a move.

QHow does Hassett view the potential impact of AI investment on the economy and monetary policy?

AHassett believes that investment in AI could create a positive supply shock similar to the 1990s computer boom, which would allow the Fed to let the economy 'run hotter' and create room for lower 10-year Treasury yields.

QWhat approach does Hassett advocate for making monetary policy decisions?

AHassett advocates for a data-driven approach, avoiding rigid forward guidance and instead making policy adjustments based on close monitoring of economic data.

Related Reads

Breaking: GPT-5.6 Prices Slashed Effective Today

OpenAI has announced significant price cuts for its GPT-5.6 model API, effective immediately. The entry-level **GPT-5.6 Luna** sees the most drastic reduction, with input prices dropping 80% to $0.20 per million tokens and output prices falling to $1.20 per million tokens. The mid-tier **GPT-5.6 Terra** is reduced by 20%, now costing $2.00 (input) and $12.00 (output) per million tokens. The flagship **GPT-5.6 Sol** maintains its original price but introduces a new **Fast mode**, offering speeds up to 2.5 times faster for double the cost. The company attributes these price reductions to efficiency gains achieved through **GPT-5.6 Sol's own involvement in optimizing its production systems**. The model assisted in rewriting GPU kernels and improving speculative decoding, leading to a 20% reduction in end-to-end service costs and over 15% improvement in token generation efficiency. OpenAI emphasizes this process remained human-led. A key focus of the降价 is to lower the barrier for running **AI agent workflows**. By making the capable, tool-calling Luna model significantly cheaper, OpenAI aims to enable more frequent use in cost-sensitive, high-volume tasks like code review and monitoring. This creates a potential feedback loop: model-assisted efficiency gains lead to lower costs, which enables broader agent deployment, which in turn drives further optimization. The new pricing and features will also apply to Codex and ChatGPT Work subscriptions. The changes intensify competition in the large language model market, with OpenAI directly challenging rivals like Anthropic to respond.

marsbit12m ago

Breaking: GPT-5.6 Prices Slashed Effective Today

marsbit12m ago

South Koreans' 'Gambling Nature' is Actually Forced by Life

This article explores how systemic pressures in South Korea, rather than inherent "gambling" tendencies, drive widespread speculative financial behavior. It begins by noting the high frequency of flights from South Korea to Macau, symbolizing the search for outlets beyond domestic restrictions. The core argument is that ordinary life goals—stable employment, home ownership, and financial security—have become increasingly tied to asset markets due to structural economic factors. South Korea's development model, historically reliant on corporate leverage (chaebols), has evolved into a society where household debt and personal leverage are normalized as pathways to social mobility. Key mechanisms discussed include: * **Housing Policy:** Government measures to improve affordability, like extending mortgage terms to 50 years and the unique *jeonse* (key money) rental system, embed high leverage into the housing market. * **Financial Products:** The recent approval and explosive popularity of single-stock 2x leveraged ETFs (e.g., on Samsung and SK Hynix), easily accessed via mobile apps, lowered barriers to high-risk trading. * **Social Pressure:** Media narratives around soaring corporate profits (e.g., SK Hynix) and employee bonuses create a fear of missing out, pushing individuals to use leverage to "catch up." The article concludes that this "leveraged life" is a product of institutional history and policy choices. When traditional paths to success feel constrained, and policy facilitates debt-based solutions for housing and investment, speculative behavior becomes a rational, if risky, strategy for many. The rapid cycle of regulatory approval for leveraged ETFs followed by a market crash and official apology in mid-2026 exemplifies the system's inherent contradictions. Ultimately, the "bet" is not just on assets, but on using future earnings to secure a place in the present society.

marsbit12m ago

South Koreans' 'Gambling Nature' is Actually Forced by Life

marsbit12m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片