Global Shift Towards Easing, ETH May Have Taken the 'Best Offensive Position'

比推Published on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

Global monetary policy is shifting towards easing, creating a favorable environment for risk assets. Despite a significant market decline in October, the long-term trend of crypto integration with traditional finance continues. A key narrative is emerging: U.S. political and economic elites are building a capital network connecting U.S. Treasury bonds, stablecoins, and Ethereum-based RWA (Real World Assets) protocols. This chain funnels dollar credit into assets ultimately settled on Ethereum and its Layer 2s. Ethereum's recent Fusaka upgrade is a milestone, addressing the issue of L1 value capture diminished by L2 growth. By introducing a dynamic floor price for data blobs (EIP-7918), it ensures L2 activity consistently contributes to ETH burning. Post-upgrade, blob fees have become the primary source of ETH burn, potentially returning ETH to a deflationary state. Technically, ETH appears strong. Leverage in the market is at historically low levels (~4%), and the Long BTC/Short ETH trade has been failing since November. ETH exchange reserves are at a multi-year low, suggesting a potential short squeeze. With anticipated friendly monetary policy from both the U.S. and China, ETH is positioned in a favorable accumulation zone.

Author: Trend Research

Original Title: Under Global Easing Expectations, ETH Has Entered the Value 'Sweet Spot'


Since the market crash on October 11, the entire cryptocurrency market has been sluggish, with market makers and investors suffering heavy losses. The recovery of capital and sentiment will take time.

However, the cryptocurrency market is never short of new fluctuations and opportunities, and we remain optimistic about the future market.

This is because the trend of mainstream crypto assets integrating with traditional finance to form new ecosystems has not changed; instead, it has rapidly built moats during the market downturn.

I. Wall Street Consensus Strengthens

On December 3, U.S. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated in an exclusive interview with FOX on the New York Stock Exchange: "In the coming years, the entire U.S. financial market may migrate to the blockchain."

Atkins said:

  1. The core advantage of tokenization is that if assets exist on the blockchain, the ownership structure and asset attributes will be highly transparent. Currently, listed companies often do not know who their shareholders are, where they are located, or where the shares are held.

  2. Tokenization is also expected to achieve "T+0" settlement, replacing the current "T+1" trading settlement cycle. In principle, the delivery versus payment (DVP)/receive versus payment (RVP) mechanism on-chain can reduce market risks and improve transparency. The time gap between clearing, settlement, and fund delivery is currently a source of systemic risk.

  3. Tokenization is seen as an inevitable trend in financial services, with mainstream banks and brokerages already moving toward tokenization. The world may not even take 10 years... perhaps it will become a reality in just a few years. We are actively embracing new technologies to ensure the U.S. remains at the forefront in areas like cryptocurrency.

In reality, Wall Street and Washington have already built a capital network deeply embedded in crypto, forming a new narrative chain: U.S. political and economic elites → U.S. bonds (Treasury bonds) → Stablecoins / Crypto treasury companies → Ethereum + RWA + L2

From this chart, we can see the intricate connections between the Trump family, traditional bond market makers, the Treasury, tech companies, and crypto companies, with the green elliptical links forming the backbone:

(1) Stable Coins (USDT, USDC, dollar assets behind WLD, etc.)

The majority of reserve assets are short-term U.S. bonds + bank deposits, held through brokers like Cantor.

(2) U.S. Bonds (U.S. Treasuries)

Issued and managed by the Treasury / Bessent side.

Used by Palantir, Druckenmiller, Tiger Cubs, etc., as low-risk interest rate base holdings.

Also the yield assets pursued by stablecoins / treasury companies.

(3) RWA (Real World Assets)

From U.S. bonds, mortgages, accounts receivable to housing finance.

Tokenized through Ethereum L1 / L2 protocols.

(4) ETH & ETH L2 Equity

Ethereum is the main chain承接 RWA, stablecoins, DeFi, and AI-DeFi.

L2 equity / Token represents a claim on future trading volume and fee cash flows.

This chain expresses:

U.S. dollar credit → U.S. bonds → Stablecoin reserves → Various crypto treasury / RWA protocols → Ultimately沉淀 on ETH / L2.

In terms of RWA TVL, compared to other public chains that declined after the October 11 crash, ETH is the only public chain that quickly recovered and rose. Its current TVL is $12.4 billion, accounting for 64.5% of the total crypto market.

II. Ethereum Explores Value Capture

The recent Ethereum Fusaka upgrade did not cause much stir in the market, but from the perspective of network structure and economic model evolution, it is a "milestone event." Fusaka is not just about scaling through EIPs like PeerDAS but also attempts to address the issue of insufficient value capture by the L1 mainnet due to L2 development.

Through EIP-7918, ETH introduces a "dynamic floor price" for blob base fees, binding its lower limit to the L1 execution layer base fee, requiring blobs to pay at least about 1/16 of the L1 base fee unit price for DA fees. This means Rollups can no longer occupy blob bandwidth at near-zero cost for extended periods, and the corresponding fees will be burned and回流 to ETH holders.

There have been three upgrades related to "burning" in Ethereum:

(1) London (Single-dimension): Only burned the execution layer; ETH began to experience structural burning due to L1 usage.

(2) Dencun (Dual-dimension + independent blob market): Burned execution layer + blob; L2 data写入 blob also burned ETH, but during low demand, the blob portion was almost 0.

(3) Fusaka (Dual-dimension + blob bound to L1): To use L2 (blob), one must pay at least a fixed proportion of the L1 base fee, which is burned. L2 activity is more stably mapped to ETH burning.

As of December 11, 23:00, the 1-hour blob fees have reached 569.63 billion times the pre-Fusaka upgrade level, burning 1,527 ETH in one day. Blob fees now contribute the highest proportion to burning,高达 98%. As ETH L2 becomes more active, this upgrade is expected to return ETH to deflation.

III. Ethereum Technicals Strengthen

During the October 11 crash, ETH's futures leverage was thoroughly cleared, eventually reaching the spot leverage盘. At the same time, many with insufficient faith in ETH led to many early OG investors reducing their holdings and fleeing. According to Coinbase data, speculative leverage in the crypto圈 has dropped to a historically low region of 4%.

In the past, a significant portion of ETH short positions came from traditional Long BTC/Short ETH paired trades, which generally performed very well during bear markets. However, this time an意外 occurred. The ETH/BTC ratio has maintained a sideways resistance trend since November.

ETH's current存量 on exchanges is 13 million coins, about 10% of the total supply, at a historical low. As the Long BTC/Short ETH pairing has failed since November, during extreme panic, a "short squeeze" opportunity may gradually emerge.

As we approach the interaction between 2025 and 2026, future monetary and fiscal policies from both China and the U.S. have released friendly signals:

The U.S. will actively pursue tax cuts, interest rate reductions, and relaxed crypto regulations. China will implement appropriate easing and financial stability (suppressing volatility).

Under the expectations of relative easing in China and the U.S., and scenarios suppressing downward asset volatility, during extreme panic when capital and sentiment have not fully recovered, ETH is still in a good buying "sweet spot."


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7595197

Related Questions

QWhat is the new narrative chain formed by Wall Street and Washington in the crypto space according to the article?

AThe narrative chain is: U.S. political and economic elites → U.S. Treasury bonds (national debt) → Stablecoins / crypto treasury companies → Ethereum + RWA + L2.

QHow does the Fusaka upgrade aim to address the issue of L1 value capture on Ethereum?

AThe Fusaka upgrade introduces EIP-7918, which binds the blob base fee to a 'dynamic floor price' linked to the L1 execution layer base fee. This requires Rollups to pay at least approximately 1/16 of the L1 base fee for data availability, ensuring fees are burned and value flows back to ETH holders.

QWhat advantage does tokenization bring to asset ownership and settlement as highlighted by SEC Chairman Paul Atkins?

ATokenization provides high transparency in ownership structure and asset attributes, and enables 'T+0' settlement, replacing the current 'T+1' cycle, thereby reducing market risk and improving transparency.

QWhy is ETH considered to be in a good 'buying zone' or 'best offensive position' according to the article?

AETH is in a favorable position due to low leverage in the market (4%), reduced exchange supply (10% of total supply), the failure of Long BTC/Short ETH paired trades, and expectations of宽松 monetary policies from both the U.S. and China in 2025-2026.

QWhat role does Ethereum play in the RWA (Real World Assets) ecosystem based on the article?

AEthereum is the main chain hosting RWA protocols, stablecoins, and DeFi, with its L1/L2 used for tokenizing assets like U.S. Treasury bonds, mortgages, and accounts receivable. It holds 64.5% of the total crypto TVL in RWA.

Related Reads

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit1m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit1m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit3m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit3m ago

Elderly Borrow Money to Trade Stocks, Entire Nation Adds Leverage: 'Ant Army' Panics as South Korean Stock Market Plunges

Titled "Panic Among 'Ant Army' as South Korean Stocks Plunge After Elders Borrow to Invest, Everyone Leverages Up," this article details a dramatic reversal in South Korea's red-hot stock market. After a sustained rally toward 9,000 points driven by AI semiconductor hype, the KOSPI index recently crashed, triggering circuit breakers. The sell-off was led by major chipmakers Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, whose combined weight in the index is over 50%. The plunge exposed the extreme leverage and speculative behavior that fueled the boom. Individual investors, dubbed the "ant army," had borrowed heavily or used leverage ETFs to chase gains, with trading accounts outnumbering the population. A significant portion of this leveraged money came from older citizens, some of whom reportedly cashed out insurance policies to invest. ETF trading became dominated (over 90%) by high-risk leveraged and inverse products. The correction was triggered by a pullback in U.S. tech stocks, leading to a foreign capital exodus and a weakening Korean won, creating a vicious cycle. While President Lee Jae-myung attempted to reassure markets and NVIDIA's CEO signaled support during a visit, officials like Finance Minister Ju Yeong-geun expressed concern over the dangerous "herd mentality." The article highlights a pervasive, high-risk investment culture where everyone from office workers to retirees and even parents opening accounts for newborns sought quick profits, largely concentrated in a few tech stocks, setting the stage for a sharp and painful correction.

marsbit8m ago

Elderly Borrow Money to Trade Stocks, Entire Nation Adds Leverage: 'Ant Army' Panics as South Korean Stock Market Plunges

marsbit8m ago

From Hunyuan to WeChat AI: Tencent's Slow Paced Journey Reaches the Delivery Juncture

On June 8, 2026, WeChat's developer platform announced the internal testing of "WeChat AI," an AI assistant integrated into the WeChat ecosystem. It allows users to invoke, access, and operate Mini Programs through natural language conversation. The platform offers two access modes: an "Automatic Mode" where developers authorize platform access to their source code for zero-configuration AI operation, and a "Developer Mode" for building custom skills. While the name "WeChat AI" is provisional, this marks WeChat's first step in opening its vast Mini Program ecosystem—comprising over 400,000 developers and hundreds of millions of daily active users—to AI-driven conversational interaction. This move represents the latest step in Tencent's deliberate AI strategy, moving from technical R&D and standalone product validation to integration within its super-app. The underlying foundation is Tencent's self-developed Hunyuan large language model. Ranked first domestically in application-oriented capabilities like Agent task execution in 2025, Hunyuan's focus on stability and precision over raw parameter count aligns with WeChat AI's need for reliable, low-latency operations involving sensitive tasks like payments and bookings. Prior C-side validation came from "Yuanbao," a standalone AI app whose Monthly Active Users (MAU) surpassed 114 million during the 2026 Chinese New Year红包 campaign, though daily activity later subsided. This "pulse growth" highlighted the challenge of user retention for standalone apps, informing the decision to integrate AI natively into WeChat's high-frequency scenarios. However, WeChat AI's "Automatic Mode," which requires source code access, raises developer concerns about code security, data visibility, and liability for AI errors. A deeper, ecosystem-level tension exists between the efficiency of centralized AI task调度 and the potential "short-circuiting" of merchant pages, which could erode their branding, advertising revenue, and user engagement. As Tencent Chairman Pony Ma noted, balancing centralized AI调度 with the protection of decentralized merchant traffic is a core challenge. In summary, Tencent's AI path—comprising the stable Hunyuan base model, the user-validated Yuanbao app, and the newly testing WeChat AI integration—is logically coherent. The success of WeChat AI now hinges on resolving developer trust, establishing fair ecosystem rules for merchants, and ensuring operational reliability to gain user confidence for deep, transactional use.

marsbit9m ago

From Hunyuan to WeChat AI: Tencent's Slow Paced Journey Reaches the Delivery Juncture

marsbit9m ago

STRC Briefly Fell Below $91: Will Strategy Be Hunted by 'Market Fear'?

The article draws a parallel between FTX's 2022 collapse and the current situation facing MicroStrategy (Strategy), a major corporate holder of Bitcoin. The author argues that MicroStrategy's financial model, heavily reliant on issuing equity and convertible debt at a premium to its Bitcoin holdings, is under stress. The core issue is the compression of MSTR's stock premium over its Bitcoin holdings (NAV). This erodes the viability of its "flywheel" – using equity sales to buy more Bitcoin. The company has shifted towards preferred shares (like STRC) and debt to raise capital, incurring significant dividend and interest obligations (approximately $1.7 billion annually). With cash reserves dwindling and debt maturities looming, MicroStrategy faces mounting pressure to generate cash. The article outlines three problematic options: 1) cutting preferred dividends, damaging investor confidence; 2) issuing more MSTR stock at low premiums, diluting existing shareholders; or 3) selling Bitcoin, which founder Michael Saylor had vowed against but recently did in a small symbolic transaction. The author suggests that, like FTX, a crisis of confidence could trigger a rapid downward spiral as investors flee. While noting Saylor's actions are legal—unlike SBF's fraud at FTX—the article warns the structural risk born from financial engineering and over-leverage is significant. The preferred path out is a sharp rise in Bitcoin's price to restart the premium flywheel, but this would only create a larger, more complex system vulnerable to future failure. The author concludes by advocating for direct Bitcoin ownership over exposure through MicroStrategy's increasingly risky financial structure.

Foresight News24m ago

STRC Briefly Fell Below $91: Will Strategy Be Hunted by 'Market Fear'?

Foresight News24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MAY (MAY) are presented below.

活动图片