Exclusive from Yingke | Tang Wenbin's 'Yuanli Lingji' Merges with Logistics Robotics Company, and Secures Investment from Zhipu, SenseTime, Jieyue, and Others

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-05Last updated on 2026-06-05

Abstract

Exclusive report: Embodied AI company "Yuanli Lingji" recently completed a new round of financing from major AI model firms including Zhipu AI, Stepfun, and SenseTime, alongside continued investments from industrial backers like Huaqin and SAIC Hengxu. Founded in March 2025 by Tang Wenbin, former co-founder and CTO of Megvii, Yuanli Lingji is a general-purpose embodied AI model company. In a notable move, the company has merged with logistics robotics firm "Atomix" (formerly known as Yuanli Juhe) through a share acquisition. Atomix, which originated from Megvii's logistics robotics business led by Tang in 2016 and was spun off in July 2024, has grown to become the world's second-largest supplier of pallet shuttle robots, with annual revenue nearing 1 billion RMB and over 500 projects globally for clients like Uniqlo and CATL. This merger aims to break the industry's "data deadlock" by combining Atomix's extensive real-world operational data from more than 20 countries with Yuanli Lingji's model training capabilities. The company's embodied AI model "DM0" utilizes a cross-domain training approach, integrating internet semantics, autonomous driving rules, and robotics data to achieve hardware-agnostic, precise manipulation even with a compact 2.4B parameter size. The collective investment from key AI players and the strategic merger signal a shift in the competitive landscape, as major model companies pivot from language tokens to physical actions ("from Token to Action"). T...

Author | Qiu Xiaofen

Editor | Yuan Silai

Exclusive information from Yingke reveals that embodied AI company "Yuanli Lingji" has recently completed a new round of financing. The investors are primarily several major large model companies, including Zhipu, Jieyue Xingchen, and SenseTime. Additionally, industrial investment parties such as Huaqin and SAIC Hengxu have continued to invest.

"Yuanli Lingji" is a general embodied large model company. It was founded in March 2025 by Tang Wenbin, co-founder and CTO of Megvii Technology. The core founding team consists of former members of Megvii Technology.

Interestingly, this financing also marks a rare "meeting" between former rivals SenseTime and Megvii amidst the embodied AI boom.

Furthermore, including Alibaba as the exclusive lead investor in the A+ round, this is a rare gathering of four domestic large model manufacturers in the embodied AI track. Previously, Zhipu had only made small-scale investments in the embodied AI field through its Z Fund, while Jieyue Xingchen had almost never invested in embodied AI.

This collective action also signals a shift: as the main battlefield of large model competition moves from Token to Action, embodied models with the ability to interact with the physical world have become the next high ground targeted by model companies.

Alongside this financing, Tang Wenbin is consolidating forces and beginning to integrate robotics assets.

Yingke exclusively learned that "Yuanli Lingji" has recently completed a merger with the logistics robotics company "Atomix" (Yuanli Juhe) through equity acquisition, aiming for large-scale deployment and global expansion of embodied AI.

The business origins of "Atomix" can be traced back to 2016—at that time, Tang Wenbin led the intelligent logistics and robotics scheduling business (Hetu System) within Megvii Technology, primarily promoting multi-form logistics robotics solutions.

In July 2024, following changes in Megvii's business, Tang Wenbin spun off the logistics robotics business from the Megvii system, establishing "Atomix" as an independent entity.

After several years of exploration, "Atomix" has achieved the second-highest global sales volume of pallet shuttle robots, cumulatively serving over 500 projects. Clients include Uniqlo, Mixue Ice Cream & Tea, CATL, etc., with annual company revenue nearing ten billion yuan.

As the embodied AI hardware supply chain matures, the industry is approaching a wall that must be scaled: the embodied brain. Compared to the clear evolution path of language models, the embodied AI model currently lacks even low-cost, massive, and high-quality data, let alone a convergent training paradigm. It can be said that the entire industry is groping in the dark.

In this situation, the integration of body, brain, and data may become the new norm in the embodied AI track.

Traditionally, the ideal state for the embodied AI industry has been to create a genuine data flywheel. However, the reality is that the industry is in a state of "data deadlock"—models need error data from real-world scenarios to evolve, but without being equipped with a good model, robots cannot enter scenes and thus cannot collect real data.

Therefore, insiders say the merger of the two companies essentially aims to close the loop between the model and the scenario, breaking the data deadlock.

As Tang Wenbin mentioned in a previous interview, Picking is the "atomic task" of the embodied AI era—Picking is to embodied AI what Coding is to large models. "Atomix" is like a continuously operating Picking data engine.

"Yuanli Lingji" Robot Making Breakfast (Source / Company)

It is understood that in the future, the real-world data generated from "Atomix's" operations across over 20 countries and 500+ projects will directly become the fuel for "Yuanli Lingji's" model training; meanwhile, the embodied AI model trained by "Yuanli Lingji" will quickly achieve collaborative operations with "Atomix's" existing robots.

This vision may not be a castle in the air but is built upon a certain technological foundation. Prior to this, "Yuanli Lingji" has already launched the general embodied large model "DM0".

Tang Wenbin mentioned in a previous interview that at the data level, "Yuanli Lingji" has completed the industry's first "integration of three types of data"—conducting mixed training on internet semantics, autonomous driving physical rules, and robotics operation data to enhance data scale and quality.

This cross-domain mixed training approach allows "DM0" to break free from dependence on specific hardware parameters. Like an experienced "veteran driver," it abstracts universal physical laws from massive heterogeneous data and can transfer across various robot body configurations regardless of hardware differences, achieving a universal operational logic.

"Yuanli Lingji" Robot Mixing Drinks (Source / Company)

More crucially, "Yuanli Lingji" also attempts to extend the "chain-of-thought reasoning" of large models into physical space—this enables "DM0" to achieve sub-millimeter precision operations with a small parameter scale of just 2.4B, significantly improving success rates in long-horizon continuous tasks.

Through a series of combinations, "DM0" is attempting to break the pain points of traditional embodied models: single-source data, paralysis upon robot change, and bloated parameters.

Following this merger and financing, China's embodied AI industry is welcoming a strong player. More importantly, it also signals that the industry is entering the next phase—finding the scaling law for embodied models.

This is a formidable challenge that cannot be overcome merely by amassing robot bodies.

Just this week, media reports disclosed that ByteDance is heavily recruiting a Head of Embodied AI Technology, targeting core technical talents from leading startups. Meanwhile, overseas embodied AI star company Skild AI just completed the acquisition of Zebra Technologies' robotic automation business.

The moves of giants at home and abroad are strikingly similar—as body manufacturers, data asset holders, model developers, and scenario operators begin to accelerate their convergence, the industry has officially entered deep waters.

Homepage Image Source | Network

Layout | Fan Xinya

Welcome to Connect

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the major developments in the recent financing round of 'Yuanli Lingji', and who are the main investors?

AThe major developments include a new financing round and a merger with the logistics robotics company 'Atomix'. The main investors are large model companies such as Zhipu, Stepfun, and SenseTime, with continued investment from industry players like Huaqin and SAIC Hengxu.

QWhat is the strategic significance of the merger between 'Yuanli Lingji' and 'Atomix'?

AThe merger aims to integrate assets, enabling 'Yuanli Lingji' to accelerate large-scale implementation and global expansion in embodied AI. It will leverage 'Atomix's real-world logistics operation data from over 500 projects in more than 20 countries to train its models, while its embodied AI models will enhance the capabilities of 'Atomix's existing robots.

QHow does 'Yuanli Lingji' address the 'data deadlock' challenge in the embodied AI industry?

A'Yuanli Lingji' addresses the 'data deadlock' by combining its model development with 'Atomix's real-world robotics operations. This integration provides a continuous source of high-quality, real-world task data (e.g., picking) for model training, thereby creating a closed-loop system where models improve from real errors and, in turn, enable more capable robots for real-world deployment.

QWhat is unique about the training and capabilities of 'Yuanli Lingji's DM0 model?

AThe DM0 model is uniquely trained using a mix of three data types: internet semantics, autonomous driving physical rules, and robotics operational data. This cross-domain training allows it to generalize physical laws, be hardware-agnostic, and transfer skills across different robot types. Despite having only 2.4 billion parameters, it achieves sub-millimeter precision and high success rates in long-horizon tasks.

QWhat broader industry trend is reflected by the merger of 'Yuanli Lingji' and 'Atomix'?

AThis merger reflects a broader industry trend where embodied AI is entering a deep-water phase. Companies are integrating key components—robotics hardware manufacturers, data asset owners, model developers, and scenario operators—to overcome core challenges like finding a 'scaling law' for embodied models and breaking the data deadlock, a pattern also seen with overseas players like Skild AI.

Related Reads

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News43m ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News43m ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbit1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbit1h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbit1h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbit1h ago

Opinion: The Hedging Relationship Between U.S. Treasuries and Stocks Has Broken Down, and BTC, as a Risk Asset, Is Under Dual Pressure

For the past 20 years, U.S. investors relied on a free insurance policy: when stocks fell, bonds rose, cushioning portfolio losses. This reliable inverse correlation underpinned entire financial strategies. However, this mechanism broke down around 2020 and has not recovered. Currently, the two-month rolling correlation between the S&P 500 and 10-year Treasury yields is at -0.69, its lowest level since 1996, indicating stocks and bonds are moving in sync to an unprecedented degree, eliminating the traditional portfolio shock absorber. The失效 of this hedge is not simply due to lost confidence in U.S. debt. The key driver is the shift from growth-dominated to inflation-dominated market narratives. When growth fears prevail, stocks and bonds move inversely. Since 2022, persistent inflation volatility has been the dominant factor, causing both asset classes to suffer simultaneously from higher inflation expectations. Investors now seek safety without duration risk, favoring cash, dollars, and short-term Treasuries while selling long-duration bonds. Record U.S. deficits, rising net interest payments, and waning foreign demand (e.g., from Japan) are pressuring long-term yields, with the 30-year yield surpassing 5%. This environment places Bitcoin, as a risk asset on the far end of the risk curve, under dual pressure. Higher risk-free rates increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like Bitcoin, while falling equities reduce overall risk appetite. Bitcoin's performance has become highly sensitive to macro conditions such as real yields, dollar strength, and financial conditions. While its long-term thesis as a fixed-supply asset outside the sovereign credit system is strengthened by these fiscal trends, the same conditions hurt it in the short term. The return of bonds as a effective hedge requires inflation volatility to subside, growth risks to retake dominance, and the Fed to have room to ease policy. Until then, Bitcoin trades in a market where the deepest asset class no longer absorbs shocks, removing the safety floor for all risk assets, especially those that pay nothing to wait.

marsbit1h ago

Opinion: The Hedging Relationship Between U.S. Treasuries and Stocks Has Broken Down, and BTC, as a Risk Asset, Is Under Dual Pressure

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片