Ethereum: Why Fundstrat sees $1.7K as a possible ETH bottom

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-21Last updated on 2026-02-21

Abstract

Fundstrat's head of digital asset strategy, Sean Farrell, suggests Ethereum may be nearing or has already hit its market cycle bottom, projecting potential support levels between $1,360 and $1,770 based on historical realized price data. The realized price—average on-chain holder cost—has historically acted as a key support zone. If ETH follows the 2022 pattern, it could bottom at $1,367, while the 2025 scenario suggests a floor near $1,770. Although ETH recently dipped to $1,747, Farrell anticipates a potential 80% rally in the next 12 months if it holds above $1.3K. However, sustained recovery depends on renewed buying pressure from U.S. investors, as current negative Coinbase Premium Index readings indicate a lack of strong demand. Without U.S. ETF inflows or positive shift in sentiment, ETH may struggle to reclaim $2,000 in the near term.

Fundstrat’s head of digital asset strategy, Sean Farrell, believes that Ethereum may be close to the market bottom if it has not already reached it.

Citing historical data linked to realized price and past cycle lows, Farrel projected that the largest altcoin may find relief around $1,360-$1,770.

Realized price is the average cost basis for on-chain holders and typically serves as a key support zone. In the past, ETH’s massive drawdowns eased right after breaking this support zone.

In 2022, ETH formed a bottom after dropping 39% below the realized price. Conversely, in Q1 2025, the altcoin rebounded after dropping 21% below its on-chain support level.

According to Farrel, if the trend repeats the 2022 pattern, it would imply a potential bottom at $1,367. On the other hand, if the 2025 pattern plays out, then the altcoin may finally bounce at $1,770.

Short-term headwinds

In December, the analyst correctly predicted that BTC would drop to $60K and ETH to $1800 earlier in 2026, noting that the market may recover in the second half of 2026.

That said, another broader market drawdown dragged ETH to a low of $1,747 on Binance. If the 2025 scenario plays out, the altcoin could already have bottomed out. But if it follows the 2022 pathway, then another 30% decline to $1.36K from the current $1.94K level could still be on the cards.

But Farrell expects an 80% rally in the next 12 months if ETH eases above $1.3K.

In the meantime, however, the overall selling from U.S. investors (including ETFs) seen in early February has eased significantly. However, they haven’t flipped to net buying yet, as indicated by the negative reading on the Coinbase Premium Index.

Historically, a strong and sustainable ETH recovery has always been supported by U.S. buying pressure. So, unless it turns positive, the ETH price may struggle to reclaim $2000 for a while.

Overall, ETH may have reached its potential level of reversal to the upside, according to Fundstrat’s Farrell, but there was still no strong demand. Should renewed U.S. spot ETH ETF inflows follow suit, maybe the altcoin may find relief above $1,300 or $1,700.

Final Summary

  • Ethereum may be close to a market cycle bottom above $1.3K if the current trend follows the 2022 pattern.
  • ETH may struggle to hold $2000 in the near term unless strong buying pressure resumes.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Questions

QAccording to Fundstrat's Sean Farrell, what are the two potential bottom price levels for Ethereum and which historical patterns do they correspond to?

AAccording to Sean Farrell, if the trend follows the 2022 pattern, the potential bottom is at $1,367. If it follows the 2025 pattern, the bottom is at $1,770.

QWhat is the 'realized price' and what role does it play in identifying potential market bottoms for Ethereum?

AThe realized price is the average cost basis for on-chain holders and typically serves as a key support zone. Historically, ETH's massive drawdowns have eased right after breaking below this support level.

QWhat key factor does the article identify as necessary for a strong and sustainable ETH price recovery?

AThe article states that a strong and sustainable ETH recovery has historically always been supported by U.S. buying pressure, as indicated by a positive reading on the Coinbase Premium Index.

QWhat short-term price level does the analyst suggest Ethereum may struggle to reclaim without renewed demand?

AThe analyst suggests that unless U.S. buying pressure returns, the ETH price may struggle to reclaim $2000 for a while.

QWhat significant rally does Farrell predict if Ethereum finds a bottom above $1,300?

AFarrell expects an 80% rally in the next 12 months if ETH finds a bottom and eases above $1,300.

Related Reads

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit13m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit13m ago

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinist1h ago

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinist1h ago

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinist1h ago

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinist1h ago

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinist2h ago

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinist2h ago

Bitcoin: Will a $130.5M whale move derail BTC’s push toward $70K?

A long-term Bitcoin whale moved 2,000 BTC (worth $130.5 million), transferring 800 BTC to an OTC desk (Cumberland) and 1,200 BTC to new addresses. While this suggests a potential partial sale, it did not negatively impact BTC's price, which continued its bullish trend to around $66,195. Technical indicators like the Stochastic Momentum Index and Squeeze Momentum Indicator remain positive, supporting a potential push toward $70,000. However, on-chain metrics show rising pressure. The Bitcoin Fund Flow Ratio and Exchange Netflow have turned positive, indicating increased inflows to exchanges. This typically raises the risk of short-term selling, which could weaken momentum and potentially test support near $64,800 if profit-taking persists.

ambcrypto2h ago

Bitcoin: Will a $130.5M whale move derail BTC’s push toward $70K?

ambcrypto2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow