Ethereum Foundation, SEAL Form Alliance As Wallet Drainer Threat Grows

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation has partnered with security organization SEAL to combat the growing threat of wallet drainer attacks. This alliance includes funding a dedicated security engineer within SEAL to track and disrupt malicious infrastructure, such as phishing sites and backend tools used to steal funds. The initiative, part of the Trillion Dollar Security effort, aims to improve threat detection and accelerate the distribution of real-time alerts to wallet providers. Although losses from drainer attacks decreased last year, attackers continue to evolve their methods, using trusted hosts and rapid tactics to avoid detection. The collaboration focuses on enhancing data sharing among wallets, researchers, and platforms to reduce response times and protect users more effectively.

Ethereum’s core backers have stepped up after a string of clever thefts that empty users’ wallets in seconds. A new link between the Ethereum Foundation and Security Alliance, known as SEAL, aims to make those quick hits harder to pull off. Reports say the move will widen who watches for threats and how quickly fixes are pushed out.

Ethereum Foundation Joins SEAL

According to coverage from multiple outlets, the Foundation is sponsoring a dedicated security engineer within SEAL to chase down wallet drainers and phishing networks.

SEAL will receive funding to bring in one specialist whose role centers on tracking harmful infrastructure. That includes fake websites, hidden scripts, and backend tools that allow funds to be pulled the moment a user signs the wrong request.

Based on reports, this work sits under the Trillion Dollar Security effort, which maps weak spots across user design, smart contracts, and social attack routes. The goal is simple. Turn scattered warnings into faster alerts that wallets can act on before damage spreads.

The Old Tricks Come Back With New Tweaks

Reports note that losses from drainer attacks fell last year, but attackers keep trying. Security trackers recorded a steep drop in stolen funds tied to wallet drainers during the past year.

That decline, however, did not end the threat. Groups behind these scams now rely on trusted web hosts, rapid page switching, and selective targeting that hides attacks from scanners.

Wallet teams noticed the pattern. Some defenses improved. Others lagged. The addition of a Foundation-backed engineer inside SEAL is meant to tighten response times when these tricks resurface.

ETHUSD now trading at $2,013. Chart: TradingView

Behind the scenes, a shared view of attack data is being built. It shows how scams move, how long they stay active, and which wallets are being targeted. Parts of this system are visible to partners, while other sections remain restricted to prevent misuse.

Real-Time Alerts And A Shared Watchlist

Reports say the alliance will expand data sharing between wallets, researchers, and platforms. One focus is speed. When a harmful site or contract behavior is confirmed, alerts can be pushed out across connected wallets almost immediately.

Some blocks happen automatically. Others rely on human checks before warnings go live. That balance helps catch unusual attacks that automated tools might miss.

This approach mirrors strategies used in other security fields, where shared intelligence often cuts losses even if it cannot stop every breach. Wallet providers involved in earlier efforts have already seen fewer repeat attacks once data flows improved.

The Pressure Move

The partnership between the Ethereum Foundation and SEAL is not framed as a final fix. It is a pressure move. One designed to slow attackers, shorten response time, and give users a better chance to stay ahead of the next drain attempt.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the alliance between the Ethereum Foundation and SEAL?

AThe main purpose is to enhance security by funding a dedicated security engineer within SEAL to track and disrupt wallet drainers and phishing networks, aiming to improve threat detection and response times.

QHow will the partnership between the Ethereum Foundation and SEAL help protect users from wallet drainer attacks?

AIt will expand data sharing, provide real-time alerts to connected wallets about harmful sites or contracts, and create a shared watchlist to quickly identify and block threats, giving users a better chance to avoid attacks.

QWhat are some of the new tactics that attackers are using to hide their drainer scams?

AAttackers are now using trusted web hosts, rapidly switching pages, and employing selective targeting to hide their attacks from security scanners.

QWhat is the Trillion Dollar Security effort mentioned in the article?

AThe Trillion Dollar Security effort is an initiative that maps vulnerabilities across user design, smart contracts, and social attack routes, aiming to turn scattered warnings into faster, actionable alerts for wallets.

QHow effective have previous data-sharing efforts been in reducing wallet drainer attacks according to the article?

AWallet providers involved in earlier data-sharing efforts have seen fewer repeat attacks once data flows improved, indicating that shared intelligence helps cut losses even if it cannot stop every breach.

Related Reads

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit25m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit25m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手48m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手48m ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片