Ethereum flashes a bounce signal – But THIS level keeps bears in the game

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-03Last updated on 2026-02-03

Abstract

Ethereum fell to a low of $2,156, testing a key retracement level at $2,147, which kept the higher timeframe bullish structure intact despite strong short-term bearish momentum. A bullish divergence on the H4 RSI triggered a bounce toward $2,395, with potential to reach $2,600–$2,800—a key resistance and liquidity zone. However, the short-term bias remains bearish, and traders are advised to wait for a clearer signal before entering short positions. A move above $3,041 would shift momentum bullishly. Institutions like Bitmine continue accumulating ETH, supporting long-term bullish sentiment.

Ethereum fell to a low of $2,156 on Monday, the 2nd of February. AMBCrypto had reported that the short-term momentum was strongly bearish, as was the market-wide sentiment across the crypto industry.

At the same time, the higher timeframe price charts also suggested that it was a good buying opportunity.

Ethereum was trading within a weekly bullish swing structure established during the mid-2025 rally.

In recent hours, it nearly retested the 78.6% retracement level at $2,147. Therefore, the higher timeframe bullish bias was still alive.

Institutions such as Bitmine [BMNR] have also relentlessly bought Ethereum [ETH]. The company was sitting on a $6.38 billion unrealized loss, a 38.91% drawdown on its investments.

AMBCrypto noted that just last week, Bitmine added another 40,000 ETH, worth nearly $90 million, to its treasury. They were prepared to “buy the dip” in a difficult 2026, asserted Tom Lee.

Assessing the short-term ETH price action

While the long-term bias has reason to be bullish, the lower timeframe bias was firmly bearish for swing traders as of press time.

A price bounce toward $2.7k would likely yield the next selling opportunity.

Such a bounce is expected because the H4 RSI made a bullish divergence within the oversold territory. Marked in orange, this divergence was followed by a 6.58% price bounce to $2,395 within 12 hours.

It is possible that the bounce would go toward $2,600 in the coming days.

Traders’ call to action – Wait...!

A bounce is possible, but it is too risky to bet on.

Scalp traders can use the H4 structure to inform their LTF biases if looking for longs. For other traders, ETH was neither at a feasible spot to go short, nor was it exhibiting an inclination for a sizeable bounce.

As the Liquidation Heatmap showed, a bounce above $2,400 would be the first trigger for short sellers.

A liquidity sweep of $2,450 could be followed by a price plunge. Alternatively, a bounce toward $2,700-$2,800 can not be ruled out.

This zone was both a liquidity cluster and a key Fibonacci retracement area. Therefore, traders can wait for a few days for ETH to show its hand before looking to go short.

A rally beyond the local high at $3,041 will flip the H4 bias bullishly.


Final Thoughts

  • Ethereum has the potential for a dramatic rebound after the intense bearishness in recent months.
  • That rebound will not materialize in the coming days, and traders can remain bearishly biased this week.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the low price of Ethereum on Monday, February 2nd, as mentioned in the article?

AEthereum fell to a low of $2,156 on Monday, the 2nd of February.

QAccording to the article, what action did the institution Bitmine take regarding Ethereum last week?

ALast week, Bitmine added another 40,000 ETH, worth nearly $90 million, to its treasury.

QWhat technical indicator on the H4 chart signaled a potential price bounce for Ethereum?

AThe H4 RSI made a bullish divergence within the oversold territory, which was followed by a price bounce.

QWhat price zone is identified as both a liquidity cluster and a key Fibonacci retracement area, making it a potential target for a bounce and a subsequent selling opportunity?

AThe price zone of $2,700-$2,800 is identified as both a liquidity cluster and a key Fibonacci retracement area.

QWhat is the overall short-term trading advice for Ethereum given in the article's conclusion?

AThe article advises that a significant rebound is not expected in the coming days and that they can remain bearishly biased for the week.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit11m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit11m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit27m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片