Ethereum Attracts Non-Stop Buying From Public Companies – Here Are The Numbers

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-10Last updated on 2026-04-10

Abstract

Ethereum has regained its price above $2,000 amid growing institutional interest, despite recent market volatility. Public companies have been accumulating ETH, purchasing approximately 7.4 million tokens over the past 12 months, representing 6.1% of its circulating supply. These holdings, which were near zero in May 2025, have surged to over 6.5 million ETH by April 2026, indicating strong long-term confidence. Additionally, Ethereum staking has reached a new all-time high, with 32% of the total supply locked in staking contracts—up from 16% in May 2021—further reducing available sell pressure and strengthening network security.

After a brief period of trading below the $2,000 mark, the Ethereum price has regained above this level as bullish momentum slowly returns to the market. Even though ETH has been struggling with the growing volatility across the market, interest in the asset at the institutional level has remained strong, with accumulation spiking each month.

Institutional Interest In Ethereum Keeps Expanding

Ethereum may be experiencing prolonged sideways price action, but institutional investors in the sector are unfazed by the bearish performance. During the downward trend, a steady wave of institutional demand is building around the leading altcoin, putting it in the spotlight.

Over the past few months, public companies have been accumulating the altcoin at a relentless pace. These companies are steadily increasing their holdings rather than slowing down in the face of market uncertainty, indicating a strong long-term belief in Ethereum’s place in the developing digital economy.

In a post on the X platform, Leon Waidmann, a market expert and research head at Lisk, revealed that these public companies have scooped up approximately 7.4 million ETH in a period of 12 months. This figure represents a 6.1% of the total circulating supply of ETH.

ETH treasury holding at a new peak | Source: Chart from Leon Waidmann on X

Even after a massive wave of accumulation, these public companies are still buying ETH, persistently tightening available supply. Such a sustained accumulation by institutions strengthens the narrative of ETH as a strategic asset for corporate treasuries.

As of May 2025, the cumulative ETH treasury holdings of institutional and corporate players were sitting at near 0. However, by April 2026, over 6.5 million ETH have been scooped off the market, demonstrating ETH’s position as a leading crypto asset with short and long-term potential.

These ETH are being moved into treasury reserves, rather than cryptocurrency exchanges, suggesting a holding sentiment, especially for the long term. As a result, these coins are not available to sell without board approval, shareholder disclosure, and regulatory filings. In a market deep in bearish conditions, public companies’ ETH holdings continue to climb, as they add more coins every single month.

ETH Staking Rises To Historical Levels

While institutional accumulation has spiked, Ethereum staking activity has also experienced a sharp uptick. After persistent staking activity, the number of ETH staked has now reached a new all-time high, reflecting growing participation in the network’s proof-of-stake system.

As seen in the chart, over 32% of all ETH’s entire supply is now locked away in staking contracts. In May 2021, the total number of staked ETH was 18 million, marking a 16% of its entire supply. Meanwhile, by March 2026, the figure had increased to a staggering 40 million ETH or 32% of its entire supply.

Waidmann added that the 32% of ETH’s total supply is not present on cryptocurrency exchanges or in wallets waiting to sell. Rather, they are stored in staking contracts and actively being used to secure the Ethereum network.

ETH trading at $2,179 on the 1D chart | Source: ETHUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat percentage of Ethereum's total supply is currently staked, and how does this compare to May 2021?

AAs of March 2026, 32% of Ethereum's total supply is staked. This is a significant increase from May 2021, when only 16% of the supply was staked.

QHow much ETH have public companies accumulated over a 12-month period, and what does this represent of the total supply?

APublic companies have accumulated approximately 7.4 million ETH over a 12-month period, which represents 6.1% of the total circulating supply.

QWhat does the movement of ETH into treasury reserves instead of exchanges suggest about the holding sentiment of these companies?

AIt suggests a strong long-term holding sentiment, as these coins are not readily available to sell and would require board approval, shareholder disclosure, and regulatory filings to be liquidated.

QWhat was the state of institutional ETH treasury holdings in May 2025, and how has it changed by April 2026?

AIn May 2025, the cumulative ETH treasury holdings of institutional and corporate players were near zero. By April 2026, over 6.5 million ETH had been acquired.

QDespite market conditions, what is the trend for public companies' Ethereum holdings?

ADespite bearish market conditions, public companies' ETH holdings continue to climb as they add more coins to their reserves every single month.

Related Reads

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit11m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit11m ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片