Eight Years of Turbulence in Web3 Phones: From 'Geek Toy' to Xiaomi's 'Factory Standard'

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

Web3 Smartphones: An 8-Year Evolution from 'Geek Toy' to Xiaomi's 'Standard Feature' On December 10th, high-performance blockchain Sei announced a partnership with Xiaomi, the world's third-largest smartphone manufacturer. The Sei Foundation will develop a next-gen crypto wallet and DApp discovery platform, which will be pre-installed on Xiaomi's new smartphones for global markets (excluding mainland China and the US). Utilizing MPC technology, the collaboration aims to allow users to log in directly via Google or Xiaomi accounts, eliminating intimidating seed phrases. A pilot stablecoin payment system is also slated for 2026, enabling purchases at Xiaomi's retail stores with tokens like USDC. The journey of Web3 phones began around 2018 with devices like Sirin Labs' Finney and HTC's Exodus 1, which focused on "hardware sovereignty" and extreme security, often featuring physical safeguards or trusted execution environments (TEE). These early attempts, including niche projects like Pundi X's communication-focused BOB phone and Electroneum's low-cost "cloud mining" M1, were commercially unsuccessful due to high costs and poor user experience, remaining confined to tech enthusiasts. Mainstream manufacturers like Samsung cautiously entered the space around 2019, integrating features like the Samsung Blockchain Keystore into flagship models. A notable early example was the "KlaytnPhone" edition of the Galaxy Note 10, which included free KLAY, prefiguring the later "airdrop" mod...

On December 10th, the high-performance public chain Sei announced a partnership with Xiaomi, the world's third-largest smartphone manufacturer. The Sei Foundation will develop a new generation of crypto wallets and a decentralized application (DApp) discovery platform, which will be pre-installed directly on Xiaomi's new smartphones targeting the global market (excluding Mainland China and the United States).

The two parties plan to utilize Multi-Party Computation (MPC) technology, allowing users to log into the wallet directly via their Google or Xiaomi accounts, eliminating the intimidating 'seed phrases' for average users. They also plan to pilot a stablecoin payment system in regions like Hong Kong and the European Union in the second quarter of 2026, enabling users to directly use tokens like USDC to purchase electronics at Xiaomi's over 20,000 offline retail stores.


Retrospective: The Seven-Year Evolution of Web3 Phones


First-Generation Attempts (2018–2020): Hardcore Security and Wild Imagination


Image source: Internet, compiled by AI


Around 2018, alongside the first major crypto market bull run, the first batch of 'blockchain phones' was born. The representatives of this era were Sirin Labs' Finney and HTC's Exodus 1, whose design philosophies were 'hardware sovereignty' and 'ultimate security'.


Taking Sirin Labs' Finney as an example, this phone featured a unique slide-out 'security screen' that used physical isolation specifically for displaying transaction details and entering passwords, ensuring funds remained safe even if the main system was compromised. HTC, in collaboration with Binance, developed the Exodus 1, introducing the 'Zion Vault', which utilized the phone chip's Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) to store private keys.


Besides Sirin and HTC, another device worth mentioning is the SikurPhone, which represented an attempt at a 'closed system' at the time. Launched by a Brazilian security company, the SikurPhone focused on being 'hacker-proof' and having a built-in cold wallet. Its extreme approach was running the highly closed SikurOS, which did not allow users to install third-party applications themselves (requiring manufacturer evaluation), thereby reducing the attack surface.


Beyond secure storage, entrepreneurs of the time had even more cyberpunk imaginations. Pundi X launched the Blok On Blok (BOB) phone, attempting to solve the problem of decentralized communication. This modular phone allowed users to switch between 'Android mode' and 'blockchain mode', claiming to enable calls and data transmission over a decentralized network without going through mobile carriers.


During this phase, Electroneum released the M1 phone priced at just $80. It targeted developing countries, allowing users to perform 'cloud mining' on the phone to earn tokens for paying phone bills. Although it didn't gain traction at the time due to poor user experience, it was actually the precursor to the later 'phone-as-a-miner' and JamboPhone models.


However, these devices ultimately could not escape commercial failure. The Finney was priced as high as $999 and had dismal sales, while Pundi X's decentralized communication failed to take off due to a lack of user base. The technological features of the time overly emphasized turning the phone into a 'cold wallet' or 'full node', which posed too high a barrier for ordinary users, resulting in products that only circulated within geek circles.


Mainstream Manufacturers Testing the Waters (2019–2022): Cautious Exploration


Image source: Internet, compiled by AI


Seeing the attempts of early startups, mainstream phone manufacturers began testing the waters in a more cautious manner. Samsung integrated the Samsung Blockchain Keystore into its Galaxy S10 series, theoretically giving tens of millions of flagship phone users a hardware-level encrypted wallet.


It is worth noting that Samsung actually laid the groundwork for 'buy a phone, get tokens' as early as 2019. In its 'KlaytnPhone' special edition of the Galaxy Note 10, Samsung partnered with the Korean internet giant Kakao to randomly include 2,000 KLAY tokens. This can be seen as the earliest雏形 (prototype) of the later successful Solana Saga model, although it was confined to the Korean market at the time and did not cause a global sensation.


This period also saw attempts targeting specific niche markets. For example, Vertu launched the Metavertu, priced at tens of thousands of dollars, promoting 'dual-system' switching and luxury services, aiming to attract crypto tycoons. HTC also pivoted to launch the Desire 22 Pro, focusing on the metaverse concept.


Although the involvement of major manufacturers brought better hardware experiences, the limitations of this stage were still evident: Web3 functions were often hidden in deep menus or used merely as marketing gimmicks, failing to fundamentally change user habits.


Besides the 'hardware wallet' attempts by big manufacturers (Samsung) and 'luxury gimmicks' (Vertu), this stage also saw a lightweight path of 'software-defined membership' with the Nothing Phone. Nothing Phone partnered with Polygon to establish a decentralized membership loyalty program through the 'Black Dot' NFT.


The New Wave (2023–2025): Ecosystem Binding and Infrastructure-ization


Image source: Internet, compiled by AI


Entering 2023, the Web3 phone market was completely activated by the Solana Saga, ushering in a new era of 'ecosystem binding' and 'token incentives'. The Solana Saga initially had stagnant sales due to poor cost-performance, but after the value of the included BONK token airdrop exceeded the phone's price, it sold out instantly, earning the nickname 'dividend phone'.


The subsequent Solana Seeker (Chapter 2) continued this airdrop logic, using 'Soulbound Tokens' (SBT) to prevent scalping and introducing the TEEPIN architecture to support decentralized infrastructure networks.


Meanwhile, ecosystem competition intensified. The TON ecosystem launched the Universal Basic Smartphone (UBS), also priced at $99, directly challenging the JamboPhone. The TON phone leverages Telegram's massive user base, focusing on 'data dividends', allowing users not only to earn money by completing tasks but also to profit from selling their own data. Binance Labs-incubated Coral Phone also joined the fray, aiming to build a dedicated hardware entry point for the BNB Chain ecosystem, focusing on multi-chain aggregation and AI functions.


In the low-end market, the JamboPhone entered the arena with an ultra-low price of $99, serving as an entry point for 'super apps' and attracting users in Africa and Southeast Asia through a 'Learn to Earn' model. New players like Up Mobile also began to get a piece of the pie by combining AI and Move language technology. Jambo has already launched its second-generation product. While maintaining the $99 price, it upgraded the RAM to 12GB (although the processor remains entry-level), which is already capable of handling more Web3 tasks and 'super app' demands in emerging markets.


The BSIM card launched by China Telecom and Conflux showcased another path: a SIM card with a built-in high-performance security chip. Users simply need to replace their SIM card to transform any ordinary Android phone into a higher-security Web3 device. This 'Trojan Horse' strategy provides a new approach for large-scale adoption in compliant markets.


Trends: Shifts in Five Directions


Looking at the development over these eight years, we can clearly see five key shifts happening with Web3 phones.


Hardware capabilities and security architectures are upgrading. Early security relied mainly on software or simple TEE isolation, whereas now, technology is evolving towards more complex directions. Solana Seeker introduced the TEEPIN (Trusted Execution Environment Platform Infrastructure Network) architecture, enabling the phone to act as a trusted node participating in DePIN network construction. The BSIM card launched by China Telecom and Conflux integrates private key generation and storage directly into the SIM card, achieving telecom-grade hardware security. The collaboration between Xiaomi and Sei employs MPC technology, allowing users to log in with one click via their Google account, enabling secure management without seed phrases.


Ecosystem binding has become standard. Today's Web3 phones are not just generic crypto devices but entry points to specific public chain ecosystems. Saga is bound to Solana, Up Mobile is bound to Movement Labs, while JamboPhone, based on Aptos, further aggregates the Solana and Tether payment ecosystems, becoming a super app entry point for emerging markets. The phone has become a channel for public chains to distribute applications and retain users.


Airdrops or incentives dominate user growth. The motivation for users to buy Web3 phones has shifted from 'secure storage' to 'obtaining收益 (returns/profits)'. Saga's success proved that hardware can be used as a 'loss-leading' tool, compensating users with subsequent token airdrops or other incentives. This economic model of 'phone-as-a-miner' or 'phone-as-a-golden-shovel' has become the strongest driving force in the current market.


Application scenarios take precedence over technical concepts. Early products were obsessed with geeky functions like 'running a full node', while the current focus has shifted to practical applications. The core of the Xiaomi-Sei collaboration is stablecoin payments, and JamboPhone focuses on流量变现 (monetizing traffic) through built-in apps. Solving real payment and application distribution problems is more attractive than pure technological stacking.


Channel and scale effects are beginning to show. Selling 20,000 Solana Saga units was considered a huge success, but it's a drop in the bucket compared to Xiaomi's annual shipment volume of 168 million units. When a major manufacturer like Xiaomi starts pre-installing wallets via system updates, the growth scale of Web3 users will leap from 'ten-thousands' to 'hundreds of millions'. This scale effect is unmatched by any vertical crypto phone manufacturer.


Conclusion: Tearing Down the Walls, Integrating into the Mainstream


Throughout this eight-year evolution, we attempted to build expensive, closed Web3 phones as secure fortresses. But reality has proven that the real 'wall' hindering Web3 adoption is not security, but the complexity of seed phrases and the fragmented user experience.


Truly valuable Web3 phones will eventually no longer need to label themselves as 'Web3 phones'. They should be like today's 5G phones; you don't need to understand the underlying communication protocols, you just enjoy the high-speed experience they bring.


Solana Mobile proved that breaking through driven by利益 (interest/profit) is feasible, while SEI's partnership with Xiaomi is attempting to prove that integration driven by experience is the long-term solution. In this evolution from 'hardcore toy' to 'mass tool', whoever lowers the technical barrier of Web3 the most, whoever彻底推倒 (completely tears down) this cognitive wall, will hold the ticket to the next hundred-million user base.

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of the recent partnership between Sei and Xiaomi in the Web3 phone market?

AThe partnership signifies a major shift towards mainstream adoption, as Sei will develop a next-gen crypto wallet and DApp discovery platform pre-installed on Xiaomi's global smartphones (excluding China and the US). It leverages MPC technology for seamless login via Google or Xiaomi accounts, eliminating seed phrases, and plans to pilot a stablecoin payment system (e.g., USDC) in Xiaomi's retail stores by 2026.

QHow did the early Web3 phones (2018-2020) differ from the current generation in terms of focus and user experience?

AEarly Web3 phones like Sirin Finney and HTC Exodus 1 focused on 'hardware sovereignty' and 'extreme security' through features like physical isolation screens and trusted execution environments (TEE). They were expensive, complex, and targeted at tech-savvy users, whereas current models prioritize user incentives (e.g., airdrops), practical applications (e.g., payments), and seamless integration, lowering barriers for mainstream users.

QWhat role did Solana Saga play in revitalizing the Web3 phone market in 2023?

ASolana Saga activated the market by introducing an 'ecosystem binding' and 'token incentive' model. Initially slow-selling, it gained massive popularity when the included BONK token airdrop exceeded the phone's price, making it a 'dividend phone.' This success demonstrated that hardware could be used as a loss-leading tool for user acquisition through future airdrops and rewards.

QWhat are the five key shifts in Web3 phone development highlighted in the article?

AThe five shifts are: 1) Upgraded hardware security (e.g., TEEPIN, MPC, BSIM cards); 2) Ecosystem binding (phones as entry points for specific chains like Solana or Aptos); 3) Airdrop/incentive-driven user growth; 4) Focus on practical applications (e.g., payments) over technical concepts; 5) Emergence of scale and channel effects, with major manufacturers like Xiaomi enabling billion-user reach.

QHow does the BSIM card developed by China Telecom and Conflux represent an alternative approach to Web3 phone integration?

AThe BSIM card is a 'Trojan horse' strategy that embeds a high-performance security chip into a SIM card. By simply replacing the SIM, any standard Android phone can be transformed into a Web3 device with enhanced security for private key storage and management, offering a compliant and scalable solution for mass adoption without requiring specialized hardware.

Related Reads

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit1h ago

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit1h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit8h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit8h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手8h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手8h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片