Dutch Regulator Orders Polymarket to Halt Betting Services

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-21Last updated on 2026-02-21

Abstract

The Netherlands Gambling Authority has ordered Polymarket's Dutch affiliate, Adventure One, to immediately halt its unlicensed betting services in the country. The platform, which allowed users to place bets on events like local elections, faces potential fines of up to $990,000 for non-compliance. This action highlights the regulatory clash surrounding prediction markets, which offer wagers not permitted under Dutch law, even for licensed operators. The enforcement occurs amid broader debates on digital asset regulations in the Netherlands, including a proposed capital gains tax on cryptocurrencies. This case underscores the ongoing tension between rapidly growing prediction markets and national gambling frameworks across various jurisdictions.

The Netherlands Gambling Authority has ordered its Dutch affiliate, Adventure One, to put a stop to providing betting services to natives without permission, marking a move against prediction markets platform Polymarket.

As per the notice released on February 17, the regulator mentioned that the company must ban its activities quickly or risk penalties of up to $990,000. Officials mentioned that the platform permitted users in the Netherlands to place bets banned under national law, comprising contracts associated with local elections, and had not replied to previous requests from authorities to address the issue.

Ella Seijsener, the director of licensing and supervision of the authority, said that prediction markets are increasing, including in the Netherlands. She also mentioned that such operators offer wagers that aren’t permitted in the Dutch market under any circumstances, even for licensed gambling firms.

At the beginning of this year, the CLO of the company, Neal Kumar, mentioned the company was open to discussions with regulators while US federal courts look for questions over oversight of prediction markets.

The Hold of The Operations

The debate reflects wider regulatory tension around event-based contracts. In the US, platforms providing similar products have drawn investigation from state authorities, many of which claim the services look like sports betting.

Meanwhile, leadership at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has pushed back against state interference, saying it has federal jurisdiction over prediction market activity. The enforcement action also comes as Dutch policymakers debate tighter regulations impacting digital assets.

The House of Representatives of the country has progressed a proposal rolling out a 36% capital gains tax on some investments, a measure anticipated to cover cryptocurrencies if approved.

Currently, the order of the regulator has placed Polymarket’s operations in the Netherlands on hold, underscoring how quickly increasing prediction markets are hitting with national gambling frameworks over various jurisdictions.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Slides to $3: Hold the Line or Head for Deeper Losses?

TagsDutchNetherlandsPolymarket

Related Questions

QWhat action did the Netherlands Gambling Authority take against Polymarket's Dutch affiliate?

AThe Netherlands Gambling Authority ordered its Dutch affiliate, Adventure One, to stop providing betting services to Dutch residents without permission.

QWhat potential financial penalty does Polymarket face for non-compliance with the order?

APolymarket faces potential fines of up to $990,000 if it does not quickly ban its activities in the Netherlands.

QAccording to the regulator, what type of bets did Polymarket allow that are prohibited under Dutch law?

AThe platform permitted users to place bets banned under national law, including contracts associated with local elections.

QHow has the regulatory action affected Polymarket's operations in the Netherlands?

AThe order has placed Polymarket's operations in the Netherlands on hold.

QWhat broader regulatory development in the Netherlands is mentioned alongside this enforcement action?

ADutch policymakers are debating tighter regulations impacting digital assets, including a proposal for a 36% capital gains tax on some investments that would cover cryptocurrencies if approved.

Related Reads

Wall Street Rushes into Ethereum, but Has It Become a Castoff for Investors?

Wall Street Embraces Ethereum, But Investors Remain Wary Ethereum is gaining significant institutional adoption from major financial firms like JPMorgan Chase, Robinhood, and Morgan Stanley, which are launching products and building on the network. A new non-profit, Ethereum Institutional, has also been formed to accelerate enterprise use. Technically, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has unveiled a major multi-year upgrade plan called "Lean Ethereum," aiming to enhance privacy, security, and quantum resistance. Despite these positive fundamentals, the market reaction has been negative. ETH's price remains around $1,900, down over 60% from its all-time high. Analysts cite weak investor demand and persistent outflows from spot Ethereum ETFs. Citi has downgraded its 12-month price target to $2,240. A key challenge is the decoupling of network activity from ETH's value accrual. While Layer 2 scaling solutions have successfully reduced costs and increased throughput, most transactions now occur off the mainchain. This reduces the fee revenue and ETH burn on Ethereum itself, benefiting users but creating uncertainty for ETH holders. Price predictions are highly divergent, ranging from Citi's conservative $2,000+ outlook to StanChart's $4,000 by 2026 and even a long-term $25,000 forecast from Tom Lee. The consensus is that while Ethereum is increasingly likely to become core financial infrastructure, the extent to which ETH token holders will benefit remains unclear.

marsbit30m ago

Wall Street Rushes into Ethereum, but Has It Become a Castoff for Investors?

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片