Dogecoin Becomes The Next Target For Qubic’s Compute Network — Here’s Why

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-22Last updated on 2026-03-22

Abstract

Dogecoin is entering a new phase as it becomes the latest focus for Qubic, a project aiming to use blockchain networks for distributed computation. This signals a potential shift from its meme-coin identity toward a role in compute-based ecosystems. Qubic, which previously demonstrated its capability by dominating over 51% of Monero's hashrate and generating significant mining revenue, is now applying the same strategy to Dogecoin at a much larger scale. Dogecoin’s daily emissions are roughly 10 times those of Monero, representing a substantially bigger economic opportunity. Key milestones include the launch of Dogecoin mining on April 1st, a mainnet release scheduled for April 2nd, and accelerated network growth with tick speeds nearly doubled and guardian nodes surging. Additionally, Qubic is making progress in AI research with multiple academic papers accepted for major conferences. From a market perspective, analysts highlight a massive bullish pennant forming on Dogecoin’s monthly chart—a pattern that could define its long-term trajectory over the next several decades.

Dogecoin is entering a new phase of relevance as it becomes the latest focus for Qubic, a project aiming to transform blockchain networks into engines for distributed computation. This development signals a shift in how Dogecoin could be utilized, moving beyond its identity as a meme-driven asset toward a role in emerging compute-based ecosystems.

A Bigger Target Emerges In Dogecoin’s Mining Economy

Qubic’s expansion toward Dogecoin is a scaled-up continuation of the strategy it has already proven. In an X post, Qubic revealed that the firm went from controlling under 2% of Monero’s hasrate to demonstrating over 51% dominance in a live takeover event over the past year. This performance made headlines across the crypto media outlets such as CoinDesk, The Block, and Decrypt.

During the process, the network reportedly generated more than $3.5 million in mining revenue and mined over 26,000 XMR blocks. This shows that a decentralized AI-driven compute network could outperform an established proof-of-work chain through better economic incentives.

Currently, Qubic is applying that same strategy to Dogecoin, but at a much larger scale. Data show that Dogecoin produces approximately 14.4 million DOGE per day, translating to around $1.44 million in daily emissions at current prices, which is roughly 10 times the output of Monero. For Qubic, it’s the same playbook they are applying to Dogecoin, but a much bigger target.

Source: Chart from Qubic on X

Qubic has also revealed that on March 19th, the All-Hands recap signals a major acceleration phase, with multiple milestones converging into a significant month-to-date. One of the key headlines is the launch of the Vottun Brighe IPO, with mainnet scheduled to go live on April 2nd. Meanwhile, Dogecoin mining is confirmed for April 1st, with the dispatcher already active.

On the research front, progress continues to build momentum. A second Neuraxon paper has been accepted for presentation in Berlin with Scopus indexing, and 2 additional papers are being prepared for major conferences such as ALife and AGI.

The network is also evolving rapidly. Tick speed has nearly doubled to 0.6 seconds, while guardian nodes have surged from 34 to over 150 in just two weeks. With major launches and integrations lined up, April is shaping up to be a defining period for Qubic as it pushes further into real-world execution.

Why This Long-Term Pattern Could Define DOGE’s Future

The long-term outlook for Dogecoin is showing one of its most bullish technical setups to date. An analyst known as Trader Tardigrade on X has highlighted that on the monthly timeframe, the DOGE chart is forming a massive bullish pennant, a pattern that can drive long-term moves in 10 to 30 years.

Trader Tardigrade argues that in the next 30 years, those who remain positioned over time may look back on this pattern as a defining moment, one that may potentially shape long-term outcomes well beyond the current market cycle.

DOGE trading at $0.09 on the 1D chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason Dogecoin is becoming a target for Qubic's compute network?

ADogecoin is becoming a target because Qubic is scaling up its proven strategy of transforming blockchain networks into engines for distributed computation, and Dogecoin's daily mining output is roughly 10 times larger than Monero's, representing a much bigger economic opportunity.

QWhat previous success did Qubic have that demonstrates its strategy is effective?

AQubic demonstrated its strategy's effectiveness by going from controlling under 2% of Monero's hashrate to achieving over 51% dominance in a live takeover event, generating more than $3.5 million in mining revenue and mining over 26,000 XMR blocks.

QAccording to the article, what major technical pattern is forming on Dogecoin's monthly chart?

AAn analyst highlighted that Dogecoin's monthly chart is forming a massive bullish pennant, a pattern that could potentially drive long-term price moves over the next 10 to 30 years.

QWhat are some of the key upcoming milestones for Qubic mentioned in the article?

AKey upcoming milestones include the launch of the Vottun Brighe IPO, the Qubic mainnet going live on April 2nd, and the confirmed start of Dogecoin mining on April 1st.

QHow has the Qubic network itself evolved recently according to the report?

AThe network has evolved rapidly with its tick speed nearly doubling to 0.6 seconds and the number of guardian nodes surging from 34 to over 150 in just two weeks.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit3m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit3m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit4m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit4m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News14m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News14m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit31m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit31m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手43m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手43m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片