Crypto Santa’s Naughty List — List of Top Heists in 2025

ccn.comPublished on 2025-12-25Last updated on 2025-12-25

Abstract

Crypto Santa’s Naughty List: 2025 was a record-breaking year for crypto theft, with total losses estimated between $4–5 billion. North Korean hacking groups, particularly Lazarus, were responsible for over 60% of stolen funds. The largest single heist was the February Bybit breach, where $1.5 billion was stolen via a compromised multi-signature wallet. Other major incidents included a $200–400 million Coinbase insider breach, a $90–100 million attack on Iran’s Nobitex, a $48–50 million hot wallet exploit at BtcTurk, and a $91 million phishing scam against an individual Bitcoin holder. The year highlighted growing threats from state-backed actors, sophisticated social engineering, and vulnerabilities in both centralized and DeFi platforms.

Key Takeaways

  • 2025 was one of the most profitable years on record for crypto scammers, with losses topping $4 billion.
  • The February Bybit breach became the largest centralized exchange hack in history, draining more than $1.5 billion.
  • North Korea–linked hacking groups were responsible for over 60% of the year’s stolen crypto.

As 2025 comes to a close, the crypto industry is taking stock of a year defined by sharp contrasts.

On one side were record-breaking ETF inflows, growing institutional adoption, and long-awaited regulatory clarity.

On the other hand, there was a relentless surge in hacks, scams, and state-backed cybercrime that quietly drained billions from the ecosystem.

This year marked a grim milestone. More than $3 billion in crypto was stolen in the first half alone—already exceeding the total losses recorded in all of 2024.

By year-end, estimates place total losses closer to $4–$5 billion, driven by a mix of high-profile exchange breaches, DeFi exploits, and an explosion in increasingly sophisticated phishing campaigns.

At the center of it all were well-organized threat actors.

North Korea–linked hacking groups emerged as the most prolific offenders, accounting for the majority of stolen funds.

Their operations grew more advanced, blending malware, social engineering, and AI-assisted phishing to target both centralized platforms and decentralized protocols.

What follows is a breakdown of 2025’s biggest crypto heists, the groups behind them, and the structural weaknesses they exposed.

Consider it crypto’s year-end “naughty list”—not just a tally of losses, but a look at the lessons the industry is being forced to learn heading into 2026.

Earn Crypto with These Top Mining Apps
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Mining Rig Rentals<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Mining Rig Rentals

promotions
Earn a commission on your referral\u2019s transactions.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d19e1ff74d32de176c1b03" href="https://www.miningrigrentals.com?ref=2742248" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn a commission on your referral’s transactions.
Coins
6
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Hashing24<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Hashing24

promotions
Earn 3-10% on referral purchases<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d19ee2f74d32de176c1b5f" href="https://hashing24.com/?rid=53616c7465645f5fe8657fbf16217f483baff299e53f4db4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Earn 3-10% on referral purchases
Coins
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Binance Pool<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Binance Pool

promotions
Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67d1a119f74d32de176c1be1" href="https://accounts.binance.com/en/register?ref=DTDJBNX1" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Sign up, verify, deposit 100 USDT, get 100 USDT bonus
Coins
5
Claim Offer

Bybit Exchange Hack (February 21, 2025 – ~$1.46–1.5 Billion Lost)

North Korea’s Lazarus Group orchestrated the largest single cryptocurrency theft in history by exploiting the Bybit exchange.

Hackers compromised a third-party multi-signature wallet interface by injecting malware into the signing process, tricking approvers into redirecting over 400,000 ETH from Bybit’s cold wallet.

Funds were rapidly laundered across chains using bridges and mixers.

This incident alone accounted for nearly 70% of first-half losses, triggering market dips, regulatory scrutiny, and a reevaluation of third-party dependencies in exchange infrastructure.

The hack shook global markets, and the BTC price dipped 8%.

Although Bybit reimbursed users, it faced lawsuits due to security lapses. The incident highlighted the risks associated with cold wallet exchanges.

Coinbase Insider Breach (March 2025 – $200-400 Million)

The incident involved an employee leaking API keys and insider information about individuals for bribes.

As a result, unknown hackers drained hot wallets. However, it wasn’t a full-fledged direct exploit but enabled targeted thefts.

Coinbase pledged reimbursements, and it led to enhanced insider vetting industry-wide.

Nobitex Exchange Attack (June 2025 – ~$90–100 Million)

Iran’s largest crypto platform fell victim to a politically motivated breach, attributed to hacktivist group “Predatory Sparrow” in retaliation against the regime.

Hot wallets were drained, with funds partially “burned” or frozen—highlighting rare geopolitical hacks amid rising nation-state involvement.

BtcTurk Hot Wallet Exploit (August- $48—$50 Million)

In August 2025, BtcTurk, a Turkish CEX, suffered its second major hack in a little over a year.

This time, the attackers stole an estimated $48 million from the exchange’s hot wallets.

The 2025 attack on BtcTurk was a less expensive mirror of its June 2024 incident.

In both cases, the attacker gained access to the private keys used to manage the protocol’s hot wallets.

With this access, the attackers were able to drain funds from these wallets.

In 2024, the CEX lost approximately $55 million, while the more recent incident resulted in roughly $48 million being stolen from the exchange across seven blockchains.

These funds were then consolidated into a few different accounts.

Individual BTC Phishing (August-$91 Million)

In August 2025, a cryptocurrency investor was defrauded of 783 BTC (valued at approximately $91 million at the time) through a sophisticated social engineering phishing scam.

This incident is considered one of the largest individual Bitcoin losses due to this type of attack.

The scammers convinced the victim to provide sensitive access credentials or their seed phrase, allowing them to drain the entire 783 BTC from the wallet in a single transaction within minutes.

Visit Our Stablecoin Partners
  • Trade with Stablecoins Here Are Our Top Exchanges for Stablecoins
  • Buy Stablecoins Fast & Easy Buy Stablecoins & Crypto With a Credit Card
  • Bet with Stablecoins Top Crypto Casinos that Accept Stablecoins

Related Questions

QWhat was the total estimated value of cryptocurrency stolen in 2025 according to the article?

AThe total losses were estimated to be between $4 and $5 billion.

QWhich group was responsible for the largest single cryptocurrency theft in history in 2025, and which exchange did they target?

ANorth Korea's Lazarus Group was responsible for the theft, and they targeted the Bybit exchange, stealing an estimated $1.46 to $1.5 billion.

QWhat percentage of the year's stolen crypto was attributed to North Korea-linked hacking groups?

ANorth Korea-linked hacking groups were responsible for over 60% of the year's stolen crypto.

QWhat was the nature of the Coinbase breach in March 2025, and how much was lost?

AThe Coinbase breach was an insider incident where an employee leaked API keys and insider information for bribes, enabling targeted thefts that resulted in losses between $200 and $400 million.

QWhat was unique about the Nobitex Exchange attack in June 2025 compared to other heists mentioned?

AThe Nobitex attack was a politically motivated breach attributed to the hacktivist group 'Predatory Sparrow' in retaliation against the Iranian regime, making it a rare example of a geopolitical hack.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片