Crypto Continues to Expand in Asia as Thailand Clears Path for Digital Asset Derivatives

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

Thailand's Cabinet has approved amendments to the Derivatives Act, allowing digital assets like Bitcoin to serve as underlying instruments for regulated derivatives contracts. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will update licensing and supervision rules to enable crypto-linked futures and options on platforms such as the Thailand Futures Exchange. This move aims to enhance crypto's recognition as an investable asset class, expand investor access, and improve risk management tools. The reform aligns with Thailand's growing crypto market, valued at $3.19 billion as of August 2025, and supports plans for future crypto ETFs. The SEC will implement safeguards to address volatility and protect investors.

Thailand has taken a further step toward integrating crypto into its mainstream financial system, after the Cabinet approved changes that allow digital assets to underpin regulated derivatives contracts. The move positions the country among a growing number of Asian markets adapting crypto-linked financial products.

On Feb. 10, Thailand’s Cabinet endorsed a Finance Ministry proposal to expand the scope of assets permitted under the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). The amendment enables digital assets, including cryptos such as Bitcoin, to serve as underlying instruments for futures and options traded on regulated platforms.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will now amend the Derivatives Act and draft supporting regulations to govern participation, licensing, and supervision.

BTC's price trends to the downside on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Thailand Integrates Crypto Into Regulated Derivatives Market

Under the revised framework, digital assets will be recognized as permissible underlying assets for derivatives products listed on exchanges such as the Thailand Futures Exchange (TFEX).

The SEC said it will revise derivatives business licenses to allow digital asset operators to offer crypto-linked contracts and will review supervisory standards for exchanges and clearinghouses.

SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon said the expansion is intended to strengthen the recognition of cryptocurrencies as an investment asset class, broaden investor access, and enhance risk management tools.

The regulator will also work with TFEX to determine contract specifications that account for the volatility and risk characteristics of digital assets. Officials indicated that supervisory safeguards and investor protection measures will remain central as the market evolves.

In addition to cryptocurrencies, the amendment reclassifies carbon credits, enabling the introduction of physically delivered futures contracts alongside cash-settled products. The measure aligns with Thailand’s draft Climate Change Act and its broader carbon-neutrality objectives.

Growing Institutional Focus and Market Expansion

Thailand’s latest reform builds on a regulatory framework introduced in 2018, when the country enacted rules governing digital asset businesses. Oversight has since expanded to include stricter operational requirements and investor protection measures, while crypto payments remain prohibited by the central bank.

The SEC’s broader 2026 capital markets roadmap includes plans to introduce crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), subject to legal amendments. Officials have indicated that crypto ETFs could launch later this year.

Thailand’s domestic crypto market has also grown steadily. As of August 2025, the SEC valued the market at approximately $3.19 billion, with average daily trading volumes near $95 million. Active accounts rose to 230,000, reflecting increased participation from retail investors, foreign entities, and domestic institutions.

Industry participants say integrating crypto into the derivatives market could improve liquidity and provide hedging tools, but some have cautioned that capital requirements and disclosure standards must keep pace to manage systemic risk.

Cover image from ChatGPT, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Related Questions

QWhat recent regulatory change did Thailand's Cabinet approve regarding digital assets?

AThailand's Cabinet approved changes to the Derivatives Act to allow digital assets, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, to serve as underlying instruments for regulated futures and options contracts.

QWhich regulatory body is responsible for amending the Derivatives Act and drafting supporting regulations for this new framework?

AThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is responsible for amending the Derivatives Act and drafting the supporting regulations to govern participation, licensing, and supervision.

QWhat are the stated goals of integrating crypto into the derivatives market, according to SEC Secretary-General Pornanong Budsaratragoon?

AThe goals are to strengthen the recognition of cryptocurrencies as an investment asset class, broaden investor access, and enhance risk management tools.

QBesides cryptocurrencies, what other asset was reclassified by this amendment, and for what purpose?

ACarbon credits were also reclassified to enable the introduction of physically delivered futures contracts, aligning with Thailand's climate change and carbon-neutrality objectives.

QWhat is the estimated value of Thailand's domestic crypto market as of August 2025, according to the SEC?

AAs of August 2025, the SEC valued Thailand's domestic crypto market at approximately $3.19 billion.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit7m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit7m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit14m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit14m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit23m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit23m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit26m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit26m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit28m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片