Crypto and AI Need Female Executives

比推Published on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

The article "Crypto and AI Need Female Executives" highlights the rising prominence of women in leadership roles within the AI industry and draws parallels to their earlier influence in the crypto sector. It cites examples such as CZ Chen, COO of Manus (acquired by Meta), and MiniMax’s 31-year-old COO Yun Yeyi, who played a crucial role in the company’s IPO and commercial strategy. Globally, figures like Daniela Amodei of Anthropic, Lila Ibrahim of DeepMind, and Mira Murati of Thinking Machines Lab further illustrate this trend. The author notes that both crypto and AI are highly technical fields often led by founders strong in engineering but weaker in communication, marketing, and public relations—areas where female executives excel. Women like Binance’s He Yi and Matrixport’s Cynthia Wu previously helped bridge the gap between complex technology and mass adoption in crypto. The piece argues that the presence of women in operational and marketing roles signals an industry’s shift from pure technological development to commercialization and mainstream acceptance. As AI continues to attract top female talent, crypto—now lacking in narrative-building and user-friendly leadership—risks being left behind. The movement of talented female executives toward AI, the author concludes, is a marker of the industry’s growing maturity and commercial viability.

Author: Alice, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: Crypto and AI Need Female Executives


Recently, an interesting phenomenon has been observed in the AI industry: more and more female executives are stepping into the spotlight.

On December 30th, Meta announced it would acquire Manus for $2 billion, bringing 90s-born COO CZ Chen into the public eye. With an undergraduate degree from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics and a master's from Columbia University, she began her career in 2018, working at Vanke and FA institutions before making her final leap to Manus in 2024, achieving financial freedom.

On January 9th, at MiniMax's bell-ringing ceremony, standing alongside 36-year-old founder Yan Junjie was a 94-born woman, Yun Yeyi.

This 31-year-old COO now has a net worth of HKD 4.8 billion.

What is Yun Yeyi's background?

She studied electronic engineering at Johns Hopkins University, with minors in economics and mathematics. After graduating in 2017, she joined SenseTime, rising from financing manager to assistant to CEO Xu Li, and then to director of the new business department, witnessing SenseTime's journey from unicorn to Hong Kong listing.

In 2022, when Yan Junjie decided to leave SenseTime to found MiniMax, Yun Yeyi followed almost without hesitation.

Her value goes beyond just following.

MiniMax's prospectus shows that Yun Yeyi handles almost everything except technical R&D: products, commercialization, board matters, operations, management... Her annual salary is $1.479 million, more than all other executive directors combined, a figure that speaks for itself.

It's not just in China; globally, female influence in the AI circle is undeniable.

Daniela Amodei, with a background in English literature, worked at Stripe and OpenAI before co-founding Anthropic with her brother Dario in 2021. As president, she focuses on daily operations and commercialization, driving the marketization of Claude products.

Lila Ibrahim, former Intel executive, joined DeepMind in 2018 as its first COO, responsible for daily operations, partnerships, social impact, external affairs, and government relations.

Mira Murati, the Albanian-born former CTO of OpenAI, came to the U.S. on a scholarship at 16. From the Tesla Model X team to OpenAI, she eventually left to found Thinking Machines Lab, now valued at $9 billion...

This scene feels familiar.

From 2017 to 2021, the golden age of crypto was star-studded, with one bright spot being female CMOs and COOs.

The most well-known is undoubtedly Binance co-founder and CMO He Yi (now co-CEO). From Shanghai to Tokyo, then from Malta to Paris and Dubai, every strategic move involved her, helping the company become the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange.

Lisa Loud, from Apple engineer to PayPal's Canadian market head, jumped to BitMEX as CMO in 2017. BitMEX later became the world's largest crypto derivatives trading platform.

Cynthia Wu, COO of Matrixport, former vice president of product development at HKEX, brought traditional finance experience to crypto financial services, helping the company become one of Asia's largest digital asset service platforms.

......

Once, crypto was the world's asset focus, and the spotlight naturally fell on these female executives at the center stage.

But the tide receded, and the protagonists changed.

Now, AI is the focus of the spotlight, so we see Daniela Amodei on the Forbes rich list and Yun Yeyi radiant at MiniMax's listing ceremony.

Fundamentally, Crypto and AI are strikingly similar: "both cutting-edge and rustic."

Cutting-edge is reflected in the technology itself: blockchain reconstructs trust mechanisms, AI reconstructs productivity—both are underlying technologies that can change the world.

Rustic is reflected in the founder profile: mostly technical backgrounds, fluent in code but unfamiliar with marketing, especially government and public relations.

This is where female COOs/CMOs add value. They are the bridge between technical geniuses and the external world, capable of deep dialogue with technical teams and telling compelling stories to investors and users.

Daniela Amodei transformed AI safety philosophy into executable business strategies, helping Claude break through in the shadow of ChatGPT. Yun Yeyi brought MiniMax from the lab to the C-end market. He Yi long served as the chief customer officer, personally answering user questions and building trust.

When a product moves beyond the pure technical stage and increasingly targets the C-end, the advantages of female executives become more apparent.

After all, PR and products require not adversarial thinking but empathy.

From another perspective, capable female executives vote with their feet. They go where they can施展才华 and create value. If they start leaving an industry, it indicates the disappearance of commercial certainty.

The crypto industry's current problem is obvious: a lack of talent that can transform technology into products accepted by the masses. Mass adoption and positive externalities remain empty talk. Observing any emerging industry reveals this pattern: when female executives with technical understanding, business acumen, and narrative skills begin to rise, the industry truly shifts from technology-driven to commercialization and mass adoption.

Their emergence marks the true maturity of an industry.

The AI circle has already undergone this transition. Female executives like Daniela Amodei and Yun Yeyi are driving productization, bringing AI from lab algorithms into daily life and the business world.

As for the crypto industry, if it can't retain "elites who can speak human language," it deserves to remain stuck in the mud of PVP.

The flow of talent is the industry's weather vane.

Where they go, value is created; where they leave, bubbles often burst.


Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7604790

Related Questions

QWhat is the trend observed in the AI industry regarding female executives, as mentioned in the article?

AThe article notes an increasing trend of female executives taking prominent roles in the AI industry, such as COOs and CMOs, who are driving commercialization and productization of AI technologies.

QWho is Yun Yeyi, and what is her role at MiniMax?

AYun Yeyi is the 31-year-old COO of MiniMax, with a background in electronic engineering and economics from Johns Hopkins University. She handles almost all non-technical aspects of the company, including product, commercialization, board matters, operations, and management, with an annual salary of $1.479 million.

QHow does the article compare the roles of female executives in Crypto and AI industries?

AThe article highlights that both Crypto and AI industries benefit from female COOs and CMOs who act as bridges between technical teams and the external world. They excel in marketing, government relations, and storytelling, which are crucial for turning complex technologies into widely accepted products.

QWhat common characteristic do Crypto and AI share, according to the article?

ACrypto and AI are both described as 'cutting-edge yet rustic.' They are cutting-edge in terms of technology (blockchain redefining trust mechanisms and AI redefining productivity), but rustic in that founders are often technical experts who lack skills in marketing and external relations.

QWhat does the article suggest about the movement of talented female executives between industries?

AThe article suggests that the movement of talented female executives indicates where value is being created. Their presence signals industry maturity and successful commercialization, while their departure often points to fading commercial certainty and bubble bursts, as seen in Crypto's decline and AI's rise.

Related Reads

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit3h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit3h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手4h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手4h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit4h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit4h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手4h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ALICE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing My Neighbor Alice (ALICE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy My Neighbor Alice (ALICE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your My Neighbor Alice (ALICE)After purchasing your My Neighbor Alice (ALICE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade My Neighbor Alice (ALICE)Easily trade My Neighbor Alice (ALICE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ALICE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ALICE (ALICE) are presented below.

活动图片