Circle's Jeremy Allaire Optimistic About Prospects of 'Massive Strategic Unlock' for Stablecoins by FASB

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-22Last updated on 2026-08-22

Abstract

Jeremy Allaire, co-founder of Circle, hailed a new FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) proposal as a "huge strategic breakthrough" for stablecoins like USDC. Announced on August 18, 2026, the proposal would allow companies to classify qualifying stablecoins as cash equivalents on their balance sheets, simplifying corporate holdings. Allaire gave the proposal a "nine out of ten" rating, linking it to the potential of the GENIUS Act to drive wider USDC adoption. The accounting change is significant because cash equivalents are favored by lenders and treasurers, unlike intangible assets which carry a balance sheet penalty. The FASB's update to its cash flow statement standard (Topic 230) sets three clear criteria for a stablecoin to qualify: 1) the holder must have a contractually enforceable right to redeem on demand, 2) redemption must be for a fixed amount of cash directly from the issuer, and 3) the issuer must hold segregated, high-quality liquid reserves (excluding volatile assets like crypto or gold) backing each token 1:1. Secondary market liquidity does not qualify. While Coinbase has already adopted this accounting method for USDC, EURC, and PYUSD, skeptics like Professor Jack Castonguay believe treating stablecoins as cash equivalents goes too far. The public comment period ends November 19, after which the FASB will make a final decision.

Circle (NYSE: CRCL) co-founder Jeremy Allaire called a new accounting proposal from the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) a "massive strategic breakthrough" for stablecoins such as $USDC. He stated this on Friday, August 21, 2026.

He said this proposal makes it easier for companies to hold tokens. This came three days after the FASB proposal, which would allow financial institutions and corporations to classify qualifying stablecoins as cash equivalents.

Why Allaire Is Speaking Out About Accounting Rules

Allaire's company, Circle, issues the stablecoin $USDC, and he rated this proposal "nine out of ten". He linked the new policy to the $GENIUS Act and stated that the new accounting changes combined with the passage of the GENIUS Act will pave the way for broader adoption of $USDC.

The euphoria is not without basis. How a stablecoin is reflected on a company's balance sheet determines whether a treasurer will touch it or not. Furthermore, when assessing a borrower's solvency, lenders pay more attention to cash equivalents than to intangible assets.

Thus, a token considered an intangible asset will incur a penalty on the balance sheet, while a token equivalent to cash will not carry such penalties.

What the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Proposed

On August 18, the board published a proposed update to accounting standards. The update contains additions to section 230, the standard governing the statement of cash flows. The board chose this option over changing the definition of cash.

According to a summary of the proposal by Deloitte, the definition remains unchanged. The only change will affect its application guidance and a new rule requiring every company reporting cash flows to annually disclose their key components, regardless of whether digital assets are used in them or not.

The public comment period ends on November 19, and the FASB has made it clear that the final version of the standard and its effective date will be chosen after reviewing the received feedback. As of now, nothing is decided.

Three Tests a Token Must Pass

The FASB established clear criteria a stablecoin must meet before it can be considered a cash equivalent.

  • First, the token holder must have a contractual right to redeem it on demand.
  • Second, redemption must be made directly with the issuer for a known amount of cash.
  • Finally, the issuer is obligated to maintain segregated reserves of at least one dollar's worth of short-term, highly liquid assets for each token in circulation.

The ability to sell the token on an exchange is not relevant. The FASB believes market prices can deviate from the promised value under stress, so secondary market liquidity alone does not pass the test.

The FASB refused to consider reserves as cash if they contain volatile assets, such as cryptocurrencies or gold. This inevitably leads to the exclusion of algorithmic and over-collateralized tokens, despite them being classified as stablecoins. Compliance with the conditions set by the FASB is more voluntary than mandatory for a qualifying company.

Coinbase Stock Has Already Jumped, But Not Everyone Is Ready

Coinbase (NASDAQ: COIN) began using the new accounting method on December 31, 2025. The company told the SEC that $USDC, EURC, and PYUSD are backed by segregated cash-equivalent reserves and can be redeemed one-to-one.

The company made the changes retrospectively and stated that there were no changes to previously reported assets, liabilities, equity, net income, or earnings per share.

Naturally, this proposal has its skeptics. Hofstra University accounting professor Jack Castonguay expressed relief that the project "did not go further" and still believes allowing stablecoins under cash equivalents is already going too far.

The deadline for submitting comments—November 19—is noteworthy. By then, we will know the opinion of issuers, corporate treasurers, and auditors before the FASB makes a final decision. For now, these two tracks will remain separate.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWho is Jeremy Allaire and why is he optimistic about the FASB proposal?

AJeremy Allaire is the co-founder of Circle, the company that issues the USDC stablecoin. He is optimistic about the FASB's new accounting proposal because he sees it as a 'huge strategic breakthrough' that will simplify holding stablecoin tokens for companies and pave the way for broader adoption of USDC, especially when combined with the GENIUS Act.

QWhat are the key changes proposed by the FASB regarding stablecoin accounting?

AThe FASB proposed an update that would allow financial institutions and corporations to classify qualifying stablecoins as cash equivalents. The update adds to Section 230, the standard governing the statement of cash flows, rather than changing the definition of cash. It also introduces a new rule requiring companies to annually disclose the main components of their cash equivalents, regardless of whether digital assets are used.

QWhat three tests must a stablecoin pass to be considered a cash equivalent under the FASB proposal?

AA stablecoin must pass three tests: 1) The token holder must have a contractual right to redeem it on demand. 2) Redemption must be made directly from the issuer for a known amount of cash. 3) The issuer is obligated to maintain segregated reserves of at least one dollar in short-term, highly liquid assets for each token outstanding.

QHow did Coinbase respond to the FASB's new accounting approach?

ACoinbase began using the new accounting method on December 31, 2025. It reported to the SEC that its stablecoins (USDC, EURC, and PYUSD) are backed by segregated cash-equivalent reserves and can be redeemed 1:1. The company applied the changes retroactively and stated there was no impact on previously reported assets, liabilities, equity, net income, or earnings per share.

QWhat is a key criticism or skeptical view mentioned regarding the FASB's stablecoin proposal?

AA key skeptical view comes from Jack Castonguay, an accounting professor at Hofstra University. He expressed relief that the proposal 'did not go further' and still believes that allowing stablecoins to sit under cash equivalents is already going too far, indicating ongoing debate about the appropriate classification of these digital assets.

Related Reads

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ru35m ago

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ru35m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit45m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit45m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片