CFTC Chair Signals Shift Toward Clear Rules for Prediction Markets

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

CFTC Chair Michael S. Selig is leading efforts to establish a clearer regulatory framework for prediction markets, which allow trading on the outcomes of events like elections and sports. The agency is withdrawing previous proposals, including a 2024 plan to ban certain event contracts, to reduce regulatory uncertainty. This shift is part of a broader "Future-Proof" initiative to modernize regulation, moving from enforcement-driven approaches to tailored rules. The CFTC is also collaborating with the SEC to harmonize regulations for digital assets and define distinctions between commodities and securities. The goal is to provide a more stable environment for prediction market platforms and related digital finance sectors.

The CFTC, under the leadership of Chair Michael S. Selig, is working to establish a new, clearer framework for prediction markets. As part of a larger effort to update the regulatory framework for new markets such as digital assets and event contracts.

Prediction markets are platforms where individuals engage in the trading of contracts with respect to the outcome of events such as elections, sports, and economic data. They are becoming increasingly popular on both crypto and traditional financial platforms, leading to regulatory uncertainty.

Speaking for the first time as the CFTC Chair, Selig announced that the CFTC would withdraw previous rulemaking proposals and advisories. This includes a 2024 proposal to prohibit certain political and sports-related event contracts. This had contributed to a lack of clarity, according to the regulators. He asked his staff to develop new and clearer guidelines on event contracts.

Regulatory Uncertainty Addressed

The CFTC is hinting at a larger change in its approach to regulation of prediction markets and digital asset-linked products. This has given rise to prediction market platforms such as Kalshi, Polymarket, and cryptocurrency exchanges. The legal disputes over whether prediction markets are gambling or financial derivatives have increased the need for a regulatory framework.

Selig’s guidance is part of the “Future-Proof” initiative to update the agency’s approach to new technologies. The initiative focuses on a shift from enforcement-driven regulation to tailored regulation and aligning regulation across financial markets.

Coordination with the SEC is also part of the plan, as both organizations are working towards harmonizing the regulation of digital assets. Collaboration will hopefully help to define the lines between commodity derivatives and securities. As well as avoiding fragmentation in the regulation of traditional and new markets.

Implications for Market Participants

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig indicates a change in regulatory policy to better define rules for prediction markets in the U.S. by pulling out outdated proposals and encouraging staff to write clearer guidelines. Collaboration with the SEC and updating regulations for Future-Proof and Project Crypto indicate a coordinated effort among agencies to provide greater clarity on digital assets and related markets. The efforts are intended to provide a cleaner, more stable environment for companies operating in prediction markets and related digital finance markets.

Highlighted Crypto News:

U.S. Finalizes Forfeiture of $400 Million Linked to Helix Darknet Mixer

TagsCFTCKalshiSEC

Related Questions

QWhat is the CFTC's new initiative regarding prediction markets under Chair Michael S. Selig?

AThe CFTC, under Chair Michael S. Selig, is working to establish a new, clearer regulatory framework for prediction markets. This includes withdrawing previous rulemaking proposals and advisories, and directing staff to develop new and clearer guidelines on event contracts as part of its 'Future-Proof' initiative.

QWhy is there regulatory uncertainty surrounding prediction markets according to the article?

ARegulatory uncertainty exists because prediction markets are becoming increasingly popular on both crypto and traditional financial platforms, and there are legal disputes over whether they constitute gambling or financial derivatives. Previous CFTC actions, such as a 2024 proposal to ban certain event contracts, also contributed to this lack of clarity.

QWhich specific prediction market platforms are mentioned as being affected by the CFTC's regulatory approach?

AThe article mentions that the CFTC's approach affects prediction market platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket, as well as cryptocurrency exchanges.

QHow does the CFTC's 'Future-Proof' initiative aim to change its regulatory approach?

AThe 'Future-Proof' initiative aims to shift the CFTC's approach from enforcement-driven regulation to tailored regulation. It focuses on updating the agency's approach to new technologies and aligning regulation across financial markets to provide greater clarity and stability.

QWhat role does coordination with the SEC play in the CFTC's new plan for prediction and digital asset markets?

ACoordination with the SEC is part of the plan to harmonize the regulation of digital assets. The collaboration aims to help define the lines between commodity derivatives and securities, and to avoid regulatory fragmentation between traditional and new markets.

Related Reads

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

Coinbase's new Vice President, Ryan VanGrak, declared that regulatory wars in the cryptocurrency sector are over. Since taking office on July 9, 2026, he has shifted the company's approach from litigation and sanctions to focusing on growth and innovation. The industry can now concentrate on development rather than fighting for its right to exist. He highlighted that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, has gained significant momentum. This framework is intended to provide proper supervision, investor protection, and maintain U.S. leadership in digital assets. VanGrak's appointment marks a strategic shift from a "wartime" to a "peacetime" advisor, replacing former Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, who oversaw major litigation, including a dismissed 2023 SEC lawsuit. With his background at Citadel Securities and the SEC, VanGrak brings deep regulatory and institutional finance expertise as Coinbase expands beyond a simple exchange into a broader financial services provider, offering stocks, futures, prediction markets, and AI tools. For investors, bipartisan support for crypto legislation like the CLARITY Act represents a major shift from the enforcement-focused environment of 2023-2024. Lawmakers are now focused on *how* to regulate crypto, not *if* it should exist. However, risks remain, as the bill's passage is not yet guaranteed.

cryptonews.ru31m ago

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

cryptonews.ru31m ago

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbit45m ago

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

marsbit45m ago

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbit50m ago

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbit50m ago

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbit50m ago

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbit50m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片