Cardano’s 10% hike – Will ADA’s price recovery extend into 2026?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-29Last updated on 2025-12-29

Abstract

Cardano (ADA) has declined to the $0.32–$0.36 support level, erasing all gains from the 2024 U.S. election rally. However, recent technical indicators suggest a potential reversal. A bullish divergence in the daily RSI and a MACD golden cross coincided with a 10% post-Christmas rally. If the support holds, the next targets are the 50-day MA at $0.42 and the former 2025 support at $0.50. Liquidation heatmaps indicate potential upward movement toward $0.39 and $0.42. With most holders at a loss, selling pressure is low, offering a possible buying opportunity. A break below $0.32, however, could push ADA down to $0.24.

Within just a year, Cardano [ADA] has erased all of its +300% gains made during the 2024 U.S election rally. The late 2025 market rout dragged the altcoin back to the $0.32-$0.36 support – A level that triggered the 2024 run.

Can ADA bulls pull another surprise run from the level again?

Is ADA’s bottom in?

Since mid-December, ADA’s price action has demonstrated resilience while flashing signs of a potential reversal based on technical indicators.

As ADA’s price printed new lows in November and December, the daily RSI (Relative Strength Index) formed higher lows, signaling a bullish divergence.

Additionally, it flashed a MACD golden cross, with the same coinciding with the post-Christmas 10% rally. In fact, the altcoin climbed from $0.34 to $0.37 – A 10% upswing that could extend if the support level is defended.

Taken together, the indicators revealed that the uptrend momentum could extend itself. However, the real near-term test for bulls will be reclaiming the 50-day Moving Average (MA, white) at $0.42.

If reclaimed, the next upside target will be the former 2025 support of $0.50.

The 1-month liquidation heatmap also supported the aforementioned thesis. There were upside liquidity pools at $0.39 and $0.42, aligning with the 50-day MA. On the lower side, leveraged longs were at $0.34, marking out these levels as potential price magnets in the near term.

Is it time to buy ADA?

Another bullish sign for long-term investors or holders was the fear and distress that 3-month holders and those who held the token for over a year experienced, as indicated by the MVRV ratio.

For example, 3-month holders (MVRV Ratio 90D) had a 25% decline, while annual holders incurred unrealized losses of 38%.

Put differently, they were underwater, so they may hold on until they break even or turn a little profit before offloading their bags.

As such, with most holders now holding the token at a loss, there is little selling pressure at press time levels. That would offer a buying opportunity.

However, a break below the $0.32-$0.36 support level would invalidate the recovery thesis and likely pull ADA lower to the 2023 low of $0.24.


Final Thoughts

  • ADA dropped to a support level that triggered 2024’s rally, with technical indicators flashing reversal signals.
  • Valuation metrics and liquidation levels also indicated potential recovery, but a decline below $0.32 would dent bullish hopes.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did ADA's price return to in late 2025, and why is this level significant?

AADA's price returned to the $0.32-$0.36 support level in late 2025. This level is significant because it was the same support that triggered the major price rally in 2024.

QWhat two technical indicators suggested a potential bullish reversal for ADA in mid-December?

AThe two technical indicators were a bullish divergence on the daily RSI (Relative Strength Index) and a MACD golden cross, which coincided with a 10% price rally after Christmas.

QAccording to the article, what is the crucial near-term resistance level that ADA needs to reclaim to extend its recovery?

AThe crucial near-term resistance level for ADA is the 50-day Moving Average (MA) at $0.42. Reclaiming this level is identified as a key test for the bulls.

QHow does the Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio indicate a potential buying opportunity for long-term investors?

AThe MVRV ratio shows that most holders (3-month and 1-year) are currently at significant unrealized losses (25% and 38% respectively). This suggests there is little selling pressure at current levels, as these holders are likely to wait until they break even, creating a potential buying opportunity.

QWhat price level would invalidate the bullish recovery thesis for ADA, according to the analysis?

AA break below the $0.32-$0.36 support level would invalidate the recovery thesis. Such a break could potentially pull the price down to the 2023 low of $0.24.

Related Reads

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

Surprisingly, in the newly released "Agents' Last Exam" (ALE) benchmark from UC Berkeley, GPT-5.5 has outperformed the recently launched and highly-regarded Claude Fable 5. ALE tests AI agents on their ability to perform real-world tasks across 55 professional domains—such as 3D modeling in Siemens NX, creating game scenes in Unreal Engine, and visual effects work in Adobe After Effects—by granting them full GUI and command-line access. In the core task completion rate ranking, GPT-5.5 configurations secured the top two spots (24.0% and 23.0%), while Claude Fable 5 with Claude Code came in third (22.0%). Notably, the highest pass rate was only 24%, and the most difficult "Last-Exam" tier saw most top models, including GPT-5.5 and Fable 5, scoring zero. The benchmark also revealed significant cost and efficiency gaps: Fable 5 spent over four times more money than GPT-5.5's most expensive configuration for a slightly lower score, and was much slower. ALE differs from previous knowledge-based benchmarks by evaluating practical "ability to do" rather than static knowledge retrieval. Its tasks are derived from real expert projects, automatically scored, and designed to prevent cheating through a rotating pool of private challenges. The results suggest that high performance on traditional benchmarks does not necessarily translate to proficiency in complex, open-ended real-world work. The study also notes that agents often fail by prematurely declaring tasks complete without proper verification, and that no single model excels uniformly across all diverse domains.

marsbit5m ago

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

marsbit5m ago

Retail Ecology Dwindles, ZKsync Bets on Bank Pilots for a Breakthrough

Amidst declining retail activity, ZKsync is pivoting to target institutional banking as its primary growth strategy. The article explores this shift, contrasting it with the competitive "survival of the fittest" narrative by highlighting a cooperative model inspired by naturalist Peter Kropotkin. ZKsync is developing infrastructure like its private, permissioned Prividium suite for banks (e.g., Deutsche Bank's use case via Memento), enabling private transactions with public verifiability via zero-knowledge proofs. This appeals to institutions needing privacy, compliance, and Ethereum-based settlement security, unlike fully private chains (e.g., JPMorgan's Kinaxis) or consortium models (e.g., R3 Corda). However, this strategic focus has coincided with a steep decline in its public DeFi ecosystem, evidenced by plunging TVL and the departure of major protocols like Aave due to low fees. The network's future now hinges on banking adoption, with upcoming pilots like the Cari Network involving regional banks holding over $600 billion in deposits. A significant challenge is balancing this institutional focus with ZKsync's decentralized governance. Banks must operate on a network where rules and fees (denominated in the volatile ZK token) can be changed via community vote, and where a Security Council holds emergency control—a stark contrast to the predictable, contract-bound environments of traditional finance. The coming 18 months will test whether ZKsync can successfully onboard traditional banks onto a dynamically governed public chain or if institutions will ultimately revert to proprietary solutions.

Foresight News47m ago

Retail Ecology Dwindles, ZKsync Bets on Bank Pilots for a Breakthrough

Foresight News47m ago

The Recursive AI Anthropic Warned About: Tian Yuandong's New Company Has Just Taken the "First Step"

Anthropic recently highlighted the rapid progress toward "recursive self-improvement," where AI systems autonomously design and train their successors. In response, Recursive Superintelligence, a new company co-founded by former Meta researcher Tian Yuan Dong, has publicly demonstrated its first step toward automating AI research. The company released a system designed to autonomously execute the full AI research cycle: generating ideas, implementing code, running experiments, and learning from results. It validated this approach by achieving state-of-the-art results on three diverse benchmarks: 1. **NanoChat Autoresearch:** Optimizing a small language model's validation loss under a fixed 5-minute GPU budget, improving upon the community's best result. 2. **NanoGPT Speedrun:** Reducing the time to train a GPT model to a specific loss on 8 H100 GPUs from 79.7 seconds to 77.5 seconds, beating a highly optimized, human-driven community effort. 3. **SOL-ExecBench:** Improving the overall score on NVIDIA's suite of 235 GPU kernel optimization tasks by 18%, closing the gap to the hardware limit. The system discovered novel optimizations in this highly specialized domain without direct human expertise. Recursive's system operates as a general framework, capable of parallel exploration and cross-task knowledge transfer while incorporating safeguards against reward hacking. The company, backed by $650M in funding and a star-studded team including Richard Socher and Alexey Dosovitskiy, aims to create AI that recursively enhances its own research capabilities. This development represents an early but concrete move toward a new paradigm where AI accelerates its own advancement. It occurs alongside Anthropic's warnings about the need for industry coordination and potential pauses when recursive self-improvement thresholds are reached, highlighting the dual trajectory of rapid technical progress and growing calls for careful stewardship.

marsbit54m ago

The Recursive AI Anthropic Warned About: Tian Yuandong's New Company Has Just Taken the "First Step"

marsbit54m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片