Can RAIN crypto continue its 18% rally after $338M token unlock?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

Rain Protocol (RAIN) surged 18% in 24 hours, defying a $338 million token unlock and a market downturn. Key drivers included a Kraken exchange listing, increased liquidity, and significant whale accumulation of 165 million tokens. Supply tightened further from token burns, though the burn rate slightly declined. TVL rose 5.21% to $4 million, and trading volume reached $18.83 million. Despite breaking a descending trendline with strong volume, RAIN shows signs of losing upward momentum. The major token unlock introduces potential sell pressure, risking a pullback and testing the sustainability of its recent rally.

Rain Protocol’s (RAIN) market cap has remained above $3 billion since its launch in late 2025. In fact, until its latest bout of correction, RAIN, a decentralized predictions market platform token, seemed to be outperforming the entire market.

It did so by rallying by more than 18% in just 24 hours. This, in the middle of a large token unlock whose sell pressure was not enough to shake the bulls.

What is RAIN Crypto up to?

Numerical, on-chain, and fundamental data clearly revealed why RAIN crypto hiked when the market was down.

First of all, the token built on the Arbitrum One (ARB) chain scooped a listing on the Kraken exchange. This meant more liquidity for trading, and it became more eligible. The move also meant more participants who could influence trading activity.

Additionally, Arbiscan’s data revealed the movement of tens of millions of RAIN tokens. There was a spike in transactions averaging between 10 million and 1 billion tokens.

This meant that whales were scooping up RAIN tokens while others were taking their profits. In fact, whales bought 165 million tokens in just two days.

This meant that supply was tightening with the individual acquisition of RAIN tokens. However, another force seemed to be contributing to the reduction in supply – The token burns. When supply reduces and meets demand like now, assets tend to rise.

In fact, data from the protocol showed that about 69.46 million RAIN were burned. However, compared to the previous day’s burn, this figure fell by more than 1%.

Additionally, the TVL rose by 5.21%, reaching about $4 million.

The total trading volume also grew to $18.83 million. Users were stagnant at 28k, while transactions were at 23.26k.

Market structure break on the charts

On the charts, RAIN was trading above two areas of volume gaps and imbalances. Hence, volume drove the rally that resulted in the breakout past the descending trendline.

Buy orders at $0.009132; two-week consolidation fueled this market structure shift on the hourly chart. But in this, the zone between $0.008166 and $0.008768 was where institutions loaded. It was evident from the huge volume gaps and imbalances.

At the time of writing, the altcoin appeared to be losing upward momentum. Even so, the sellers have so far failed to take the price lower than 50% of the day’s whole move.

For now, the battle between bulls and bears continues despite the Trend Strength Index (TSI) showing the trend was intact. The hourly timeframe was too short for the TSI.

Looming sell pressure from token unlocks

Thus, the question is whether sell pressure from the unlock will spoil the 18% rally. On 10 February, the protocol unlocked $338 million RAIN into the circulating supply.

This dilutes the efforts made through token burns and induces sell pressure. It remains undecided if RAIN’s bullish factors could absorb this pressure.

Hence, the token might be at risk of a fall due to the unlock or a pullback of the move.


Final Thoughts

  • RAIN rallied by 18%, before a bout of correction, after its exchange listing, TVL growth, whale accumulation.
  • RAIN’s bulls face pullback and unlock test to sustain the price action.

Related Questions

QWhat factors contributed to RAIN's 18% rally despite the token unlock?

AThe rally was driven by a Kraken exchange listing increasing liquidity, significant whale accumulation (165 million tokens in two days), token burns reducing supply, and a 5.21% increase in TVL.

QHow did the token unlock event impact RAIN's market dynamics?

AThe $338 million token unlock on February 10 introduced potential sell pressure and diluted the effects of token burns, creating uncertainty about whether bullish factors could absorb this pressure and sustain the price action.

QWhat on-chain activity indicated whale involvement in RAIN?

AArbiscan data showed large transactions (10 million to 1 billion tokens) and whales buying 165 million RAIN tokens within two days, indicating accumulation during the rally.

QWhat technical factors supported RAIN's price breakout on the charts?

ARAIN broke past a descending trendline with buy orders at $0.009132, fueled by two-week consolidation and volume gaps between $0.008166 and $0.008768 where institutions accumulated positions.

QWhat metrics showed mixed signals for RAIN's momentum at the time of writing?

AWhile the Trend Strength Index (TSI) indicated the trend remained intact, the hourly chart showed losing upward momentum, with sellers unable to push prices below 50% of the day's move, reflecting a battle between bulls and bears.

Related Reads

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

North Korean hackers, particularly the notorious Lazarus Group and its subgroup TraderTraitor, have stolen over $500 million from cryptocurrency DeFi platforms in less than three weeks, bringing their total theft for the year to over $700 million. Recent major attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO, resulting in losses of approximately $286 million and $290 million respectively, highlight a strategic shift: instead of targeting core smart contracts, attackers are now exploiting vulnerabilities in peripheral infrastructure. For instance, the KelpDAO attack involved compromising downstream RPC infrastructure used by LayerZero's decentralized validation network (DVN), allowing manipulation without breaching core cryptography. This sophisticated approach mirrors advanced corporate cyber-espionage. Additionally, North Korea has systematically infiltrated the global crypto workforce, with an estimated 100 operatives using fake identities to gain employment at blockchain companies, enabling long-term access to sensitive systems and facilitating large-scale thefts. According to Chainalysis, North Korean-linked hackers stole a record $2 billion in 2025, accounting for 60% of all global crypto theft that year. Their total historical crypto theft has reached $6.75 billion. Post-theft, they employ specialized money laundering methods, heavily relying on Chinese OTC brokers and cross-chain mixing services rather than standard decentralized exchanges. Security experts, while acknowledging the increased sophistication, emphasize that many attacks still exploit fundamental weaknesses like poor access controls and centralized operational risks. Strengthening private key management, limiting privileged access, and enhancing coordination among exchanges, analysts, and law enforcement immediately after an attack are critical to improving defense and fund recovery chances. The industry's challenge now extends beyond secure smart contracts to safeguarding operational security at the infrastructure level.

marsbit31m ago

North Korean Hackers Loot $500 Million in a Single Month, Becoming the Top Threat to Crypto Security

marsbit31m ago

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in the stablecoin market will belong not necessarily to the issuers, but to the foundational infrastructure layers that enable cross-system transactions.

marsbit59m ago

Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbit59m ago

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

SpaceX has secured an option to acquire AI programming company Cursor for $60 billion, with an alternative clause requiring a $10 billion collaboration fee if the acquisition does not proceed. This structure is not merely a potential acquisition but a strategic move to control core access points in the AI era. The deal is designed as a flexible, dual-path arrangement, allowing SpaceX to either fully acquire Cursor or maintain a binding partnership through high-cost collaboration. This "option-style" approach minimizes immediate regulatory and integration risks while ensuring long-term alignment between the two companies. At its core, the transaction exchanges critical AI-era resources: SpaceX provides its Colossus supercomputing cluster—one of the world’s most powerful AI training infrastructures—while Cursor contributes its AI-native developer environment and strong product adoption. This synergy connects compute power, models, and application layers, forming a closed-loop AI capability stack. Cursor, founded in 2022, has achieved rapid growth with over $1 billion in annual revenue and widespread enterprise adoption. Its value lies in transforming software development through AI agents capable of coding, debugging, and system design—positioning it as a gateway to future software production. For SpaceX, this move is part of a broader strategy to evolve from a aerospace company into an AI infrastructure empire, integrating xAI, supercomputing, and chip manufacturing. Controlling Cursor fills a gap in its developer tooling layer, strengthening its AI narrative ahead of a potential IPO. The deal reflects a shift in AI competition from model superiority to ecosystem and entry-point control. With programming tools as a key battleground, securing developer loyalty becomes crucial for dominating the software production landscape. Risks include questions around Cursor’s valuation, technical integration challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny. Nevertheless, the deal underscores a strategic bet: controlling both compute and software development access may redefine power dynamics in the AI-driven future.

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX Ties Up with Cursor: A High-Stakes AI Gambit of 'Lock First, Acquire Later'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片