Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-04Last updated on 2026-06-04

Abstract

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

Amid the ongoing market downturn, Strategy and Bitmine, known as the 'Twin Pillars of the DAT Treasury,' have both incurred massive unrealized losses.

This morning, BTC once fell below $62,000 and is currently hovering around $63,800; ETH broke below $1,800, currently trading around $1,780. At current prices, Strategy's unrealized loss has reached a staggering $100 billion; Bitmine's unrealized loss is also around $90 billion. For the moment, Michael Saylor and Tom Lee find themselves 'companions in misfortune,' while Strategy and Bitmine have become the top two 'DAT companies with the most losses.'

However, compared to Strategy, which must continuously pay dividends, Bitmine faces less financial pressure and retains flexibility, such as funding through STRC preferred stock issuance. It is reported that Bitmine plans to raise $300 million by issuing perpetual preferred stock with an annual dividend yield of 9.5%. This suggests that Bitmine continues to increase its ETH holdings; whereas the sword of Damocles hanging over Strategy is—where will the funds for subsequent STRC dividend payments come from? Between the two, who faces greater financial pressure? Odaily Planet Daily will analyze for its readers.

Bitmine VS Strategy: Divergent Paths in Holding DAT

With today's sharp drop in BTC, community members used AI to mock Saylor's 'endorsement' of BTC: 'A sixty-year-old man personally endorses, ancestral BTC price as low as $62,000 per coin.'

Returning to Bitmine and Strategy, currently, Bitmine's financial structure appears safer; whereas Strategy's leverage pressure is greater.

Bitmine's Equity Issuance Game: A Debt-Free DAT Financing Play

As of June 1st, Bitmine holds 5,416,901 ETH, accounting for approximately 4.49% of ETH's total supply, nearing the '5% upper limit' repeatedly emphasized by Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee. Yesterday, Bitmine acquired another 25,000 ETH via BitGo , valued at $48 million at the time. Currently, its holdings stand at 5,441,901 ETH.

The reason Bitmine maintains the confidence to continue increasing holdings during a market downturn is multifaceted. The primary reason is that Bitmine's funding source is equity issuance:

  • When initiating the establishment of the ETH treasury DAT company in June last year, Bitmine obtained initial startup capital—$250 million—through financing, along with a small PIPE round.
  • After July last year, Bitmine primarily relied on ATM equity offerings, gradually increasing this amount from $2 billion to $24.5 billion.

Ample funds give Tom Lee sufficient confidence, and Bitmine's book capital supports further acquisitions—in its June 1st public announcement, Bitmine also mentioned: The company's stake in Beast Industries is valued at $180 million; its stake in Eightco Holdings is valued at $93 million. The company's total cash amounts to $446 million.

Furthermore, Tom Lee has previously flaunted that Bitmine's Ethereum treasury generates approximately $1 million in daily staking rewards. This refers to Bitmine staking about 87% (approximately 4.71 million ETH) of its ETH holdings through its MAVAN staking network, with an estimated annualized return of about 2.73%-3% (approximately $250-300 million), which also provides a relatively stable cash flow.

In summary, Bitmine's financial condition is sound; and the latest preferred stock financing, offering a 9.5% annual dividend and expected to raise $300 million, will further alleviate its financial pressure. For the company, the greatest risks lie in equity dilution (issuing new shares) and further stock price decline caused by book unrealized losses. If mNVA consistently remains <1, it might trigger stock sell-offs.

Strategy's Debt Leverage Game: Pressure from Convertible Bonds and Preferred Stock Dividends

Compared to Bitmine's 'using investor money to buy ETH,' Strategy faces greater financial pressure in acquiring BTC, as it primarily 'borrows money to increase BTC holdings.'

According to Strategy's official website, the company currently holds approximately $6.7 billion in convertible bond debt, plus about $9.9 billion in STRC preferred stock and STRD, STRK, STRF with varying market capitalizations, requiring substantial annual dividend and interest payments. At the end of May, after repurchasing $1.5 billion in convertible debt, Strategy's cash reserves dropped to about $871 million, covering only about 6 months of its projected $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligations.

Moreover, Strategy previously initiated a vote proposing to 'increase STRC dividend payments from once a month to twice a month.' The voting began on April 28th and will conclude on the meeting date of June 8th. If approved, the new schedule's first record date would be June 30th, with the first payment date on July 15th. Eligible voting shareholders (MSTR and STRC shareholders) must have held shares by April 17th.

Additionally, it is worth noting that STRC's authorized issuance limit is approximately $283 billion. Possibly affected by BTC's continuous decline and shaken market confidence, STRC fell below $95 this morning, currently trading at $94.65, 'de-pegging' more than 5% from its $100 target price.

Compared to Bitmine, Strategy currently faces a significant gap between high preferred stock financing amounts and dividend payments, exacerbated by BTC's continued decline. Unlike ETH, which has staking ecosystems to generate more liquidity, BTC lacks such options.

Therefore, after Strategy sold 32 BTC last month, the market began to doubt its identity as the 'diamond hands Strategy that only buys and never sells.' During BTC's persistent decline, Strategy may face a series of liquidity crises, leading to an inability to service debt and dividends, and consequently selling more BTC, further depressing the market. Essentially, Strategy is playing a high-leverage game betting that 'BTC's price will not fall below a certain level.'

Thus, considering Strategy's current mNAV value of 0.83, the market remains highly skeptical about its future stock performance. Yesterday, its market capitalization already fell out of the top 200 US companies. Currently, Strategy (MSTR) stock is trading at $126, down 7% in 24 hours; market capitalization is approximately $446 billion.

Of course, as a leading DAT treasury company, Bitmine Chairman Tom Lee remains quite optimistic about Strategy, previously stating: 'Strategy selling Bitcoin and ETF outflows are typical bottoming behaviors, not risk signals.' At the recent 'Proof of Talk 2026' conference at the Louvre in Paris, Tom Lee made an even bolder statement: 'With AI and tokenization driving major changes in financial infrastructure, ETH could ultimately reach $250,000.' However, when discussing 'Bitmine's actions after its ETH holdings reach 5% of the total supply,' he also expressed caution about further increasing ETH holdings. (Details in 'Tom Lee Recharges Faith: Crypto Spring Has Arrived, ETH Will Rise to $250,000')

Currently, Bitmine and Strategy find themselves in highly similar market situations, though Bitmine's financial condition is slightly better; Strategy faces the choice between 'selling more BTC for cash flow to pay dividends' and 'standing by as BTC continues to fall, either borrowing more to increase holdings or remaining inactive.'

Related Questions

QWhat are the main financial pressures facing Strategy according to the article?

AStrategy faces significant financial pressure primarily due to its high leverage. It holds approximately $6.7 billion in convertible debt and about $9.9 billion in STRC preferred shares, requiring substantial annual interest and dividend payments. Its cash reserves have dropped to around $871 million, which can only cover about six months of its estimated $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligation. The continuous fall in BTC price exacerbates the gap between its high dividend payments and financing needs, potentially leading to a liquidity crisis.

QHow does Bitmine's method of funding its ETH purchases differ from Strategy's method of acquiring BTC?

ABitmine primarily funds its ETH purchases through equity issuance, including an initial raise of $250 million, subsequent ATM equity offerings (increased to $24.5 billion), and a planned $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy largely relies on debt financing, such as issuing convertible bonds and preferred shares, to acquire BTC. This makes Bitmine's approach a 'debt-free' equity financing model, while Strategy engages in a 'high-leverage debt game'.

QWhat potential risk does Bitmine face despite its relatively safer financial structure?

ADespite its safer financial structure, Bitmine's main risk lies in equity dilution from issuing new shares and a potential further decline in its stock price if its market-to-net asset value (mNAV) ratio remains below 1. A sustained mNAV < 1 could trigger a sell-off of its stock.

QWhat action did Strategy take in May that raised market concerns about its 'diamond hands' reputation?

AIn May, Strategy sold 32 Bitcoins. This action caused the market to doubt its long-held 'diamond hands' identity as a company that 'only buys and never sells' Bitcoin.

QAccording to the article, what is the estimated current floating loss for both Bitmine and Strategy?

AAccording to the article, at current prices, Strategy's floating loss has reached around $100 billion, while Bitmine's floating loss is approximately $90 billion.

Related Reads

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are poised for historic IPOs within weeks, potentially raising a combined $180 billion—a sum exceeding the entire internet bubble's fundraising. The hosts of the Limitless Podcast argue this isn't just individual company financing but an unprecedented capital concentration for AI infrastructure, driven by an insatiable need for compute, data centers, power, and chips. SpaceX's IPO is notable for reportedly changing market index rules to allow faster inclusion, potentially funneling trillions in passive retirement funds into its stock, despite its unproven space-based data center business model. In contrast, Anthropic demonstrates explosive growth, with ARR reportedly hitting $45 billion and approaching profitability, fueled by strong enterprise adoption of products like Claude Code. Google's separate $80 billion raise highlights the immense capital pressure, even for giants. The discussion acknowledges bubble risks but leans optimistic. The hosts contend the massive spending is building essential physical infrastructure for the next technological era. A key bottleneck isn't capital but the real-world limits of chip manufacturing and construction speed. As long as demand for AI compute outstrips supply, this investment cycle represents a foundational build-out rather than a purely financial bubble. All three companies are seen as foundational bets on the future, with Anthropic often cited as the most immediately compelling due to its proven revenue trajectory.

marsbit12m ago

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

marsbit12m ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbit19m ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbit19m ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbit28m ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbit28m ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit40m ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片