Bitcoin’s $72K crash sparks a whale leverage war — What’s next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

Bitcoin experienced significant volatility, dropping to $72k before rebounding to $76,873, and was trading at $76,049 at press time. Large investors are aggressively entering the futures market, with one whale opening a $3M long position and another a $5.2M short. Derivatives volume surged 50% to $108B, while open interest declined. The overall futures market shows a bearish bias, as the short/long ratio sits below 1. Technical indicators suggest sellers remain in control, with a potential further drop toward $74k. A trend reversal would require reclaiming the $81k resistance level.

Bitcoin [BTC] has experienced massive volatility since it breached the $80k support level. The king coin has experienced sharp declines, reaching a low of $72k, and has since rebounded to a local high of $76,873.

As of this writing, Bitcoin traded at $76,049, down 2.63% on a daily timeframe. Amid extreme volatility, investors have adopted aggressive positions in the derivatives market.

Bitcoin whales scramble for Futures positions

With Bitcoin firmly holding below $80k, the market has experienced a sudden surge in demand for longs and shorts. The battle for Futures position is especially prevalent among large market players.

According to Onchain Lens, a Whale deposited $3 million in USDC and opened a BTC long position with 20x leverage. Previously, this whale recorded an $11 million loss on its long positions.

Another Whale deposited $5.2 million USDC and opened a BTC short position with 14x leverage, according to Onchain Lens. Before the current market slip, this whale had made approximately $10 million on his short positions.

Interestingly, these two whales are not an isolated case, as investors across exchanges have largely shifted to the Futures market.

According to CoinGlass data, Derivatives Volume increased by 50% to $108 billion, while Open Interest fell to $50.9 billion. The volume hike suggested increased investor participation, either by taking short or long positions.

In this case, investors on Binance and OKX have predominantly held long positions, with an average ratio of 2. However, across all exchanges, short positions have dominated, with the overall ratio holding below 1 at 0.958.

A ratio below 1 suggests that most Futures participants are bearish and actively positioned for further downside.

Can Futures demand boost struggling BTC?

Although Bitcoin has experienced massive panic selling, demand for futures positions has also created significant buying pressure in the market. As such, nearly $26 million in capital is flowing into the futures market.

Despite this capital flow, the bearish trend has smoothed. Looking at the DMI-ADX smoothed indicator, the negative index sits above its positive index at 36.

As a result, the ADX smoothed around 36 at press time, indicating a higher likelihood of bearish continuation bias. As such, sellers are in control, and any upside move is not a trend reversal but a mere pullback.

Therefore, if the trend continues, Bitcoin could see another drop towards $74k before attempting another leg up. For a reversal, the demand must be strong enough to reclaim the Simple Moving Average at $81k.

Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin [BTC] is under extreme volatility, dropping to $72k before rebounding to $76k.
  • Bitcoin whales are adopting an aggressive futures-market positioning, with short demand dominating the market.

Related Questions

QWhat was the low point Bitcoin reached during its recent crash, and what was its rebound high?

ABitcoin reached a low of $72k and rebounded to a local high of $76,873.

QAccording to Onchain Lens, what were the leverage positions taken by the two mentioned whales?

AOne whale deposited $3 million in USDC and opened a BTC long position with 20x leverage. Another whale deposited $5.2 million USDC and opened a BTC short position with 14x leverage.

QWhat does a Futures Long/Short Ratio below 1 indicate about market sentiment?

AA ratio below 1 suggests that most Futures participants are bearish and are actively positioned for further downside.

QWhat does the ADX smoothed indicator reading of 36 suggest about the current market trend?

AThe ADX smoothed around 36 indicates a higher likelihood of a bearish continuation bias, meaning sellers are in control and any upward move is likely a pullback, not a trend reversal.

QWhat key price level must Bitcoin reclaim for a trend reversal to occur, according to the article?

AFor a reversal, the demand must be strong enough to reclaim the Simple Moving Average at $81k.

Related Reads

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist1m ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist1m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1h ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1h ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow