Bitcoin companies keep buying as AI pulls capital away – Inside ABTC’s move

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

Amidst a market environment where AI-driven momentum is pulling capital away from risk assets, Bitcoin companies like American Bitcoin (ABTC) are demonstrating strong long-term conviction by continuing to accumulate BTC. ABTC’s treasury grew by 137%, adding 416 BTC despite Bitcoin’s significant price drop in Q4 2025. This accumulation, along with record-high Ethereum staking by firms like Bitmine, signals a strategic treasury buildup aimed at weathering macro uncertainty. These moves reinforce market resilience and confidence in the broader "crypto capital" vision, even as Bitcoin experiences volatility and investor caution.

The recent AI-driven momentum hasn’t skipped over crypto.

On the macro side, capital has rotated into legacy assets, with industrial metals being framed as key winners of the AI trade.

Naturally, this shift has pulled liquidity away from risk assets. However, it’s not just about rotation.

At a broader level, this trend has put crypto’s “utility” narrative under the microscope. In this context, what does Bitcoin [BTC] accumulation by Bitcoin companies say about long-term conviction and treasury strategy?

Notably, at the center of the discussion is American Bitcoin [ABTC].

As the chart showed, ABTC’s treasury has jumped 137%, adding 416 BTC to 5,843, making it the 18th largest among Bitcoin companies. Given BTC’s volatility over the same stretch, this accumulation doesn’t look random.

On the chart, ABTC’s BTC purchases coincided with BTC’s 23.29% Q4 2025 drop, which marked its worst quarterly performance of the year. And yet, since its NASDAQ debut, ABTC has delivered a BTC yield of 116%.

With AI-driven momentum at record highs, this marks a key inflection for crypto. ABTC’s accumulation, and similar moves by other Bitcoin companies, signal strong conviction in digital assets and treasury strategy.

Naturally, the question is: What are these companies really betting on?

How Bitcoin companies are weathering macro FUD

Macro FUD hasn’t spared Bitcoin.

After a mid-January rally to $97k, BTC has slipped back to $88k, leaving January’s ROI at just 1.5%, marking the weakest start to a year in two years, with investors clearly cautious amid AI-driven capital rotation.

From a technical view, this put recent accumulation by Bitcoin companies under pressure.

ABTC, for example, is now sitting on roughly $100 million in unrealized losses since its September purchases at around $105k.

According to AMBCrypto, this is where Ethereum [ETH] staking comes into play.

Lookonchain flagged that Bitmine [BMNR] staked another 113,280 ETH, bringing its total to 2,332,051 ETH, representing 55% of its holdings.

Taken together, accumulation by Bitcoin companies and Ethereum staking, which has reached an all-time high of 36 million ETH, or 30.6% of total supply, sets a clear precedent for absorbing macro FUD.

Beyond that, however, it’s laying the foundation for the market to remain resilient amid AI-driven rotation, especially with major Bitcoin companies like American Bitcoin showing strong backing and long-term conviction.

As a result, it reinforces confidence in U.S. President Donald Trump’s “crypto capital” vision, as Bitcoin companies like ABTC, backed by the Trump family, quietly continue to build their treasuries.

Final Thoughts

Bitcoin companies like ABTC are showing strong long-term conviction, quietly building treasuries even amid macro FUD.
Ethereum staking has hit record highs, and combined with BTC accumulation, these moves reinforce market resilience and confidence in the “crypto capital” vision.

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit9m ago

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbit15m ago

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbit15m ago

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbit16m ago

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbit16m ago

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinist1h ago

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinist1h ago

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

The global oil market has passed a critical point, shifting the focus from price increases to potential physical supply shortages. The core issue is a time mismatch: even if the Strait of Hormuz reopens, shipping disruptions have already caused significant delays, which will continue to deplete onshore crude inventories for weeks. Refinery behavior acts as an amplifier. Reduced runs in Asia and Europe don’t reflect weaker demand but instead shrink product inventories, raising fuel prices and refining margins, which in turn encourages higher runs—creating a self-reinforcing cycle. If the Strait remains closed beyond April, traditional pricing models may fail. The market could face an unprecedented physical shortfall of 11-13 million barrels per day—roughly four times historical disruption levels. In such a scenario, price becomes an inadequate balancing tool. The only way to rebalance the market would be policy-driven demand destruction, similar to COVID-era lockdowns. Current prices around $95/barrel are insufficient to balance the market. Key signals to watch include inventory levels, policy announcements, and the pace of involuntary demand contraction. Geopolitically, the situation appears likely to worsen before improving, with little room for compromise between the US and Iran.

marsbit2h ago

Not a Price Hike, but a Supply Cut? Oil Prices Have Crossed the Tipping Point

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

In-Depth Research Report on Account Abstraction (AA): Generational Leap in Ethereum’s Account System & Landscape Reshaping in the Next Five Years

As a major evolution of Ethereum’s account system, AA is designed to address the fundamental security and experience bottlenecks of the “private key equals account” model in the EOA era.

3.3k Total ViewsPublished 2025.12.18Updated 2025.12.18

In-Depth Research Report on Account Abstraction (AA): Generational Leap in Ethereum’s Account System & Landscape Reshaping in the Next Five Years

Hot Tokens Learning Week 7: Privacy Coins Rally in Rotation, with RIVER Standing Out as 2026’s Surprise Performer

The privacy + payments narrative has been the primary catalyst driving rotation and substantial price gains in privacy coins such as DASH and XMR.

16.3k Total ViewsPublished 2026.01.20Updated 2026.01.20

Hot Tokens Learning Week 7: Privacy Coins Rally in Rotation, with RIVER Standing Out as 2026’s Surprise Performer

Hot Tokens Learning Week 8: ADA's Ouroboros Leios Mainnet Expected to Launch in 2026

ADA's Ouroboros Leios mainnet is expected to launch in 2026, and the hard fork to Protocol Version 11 is planned for Q1 2026.

40.0k Total ViewsPublished 2026.02.10Updated 2026.02.12

Hot Tokens Learning Week 8: ADA's Ouroboros Leios Mainnet Expected to Launch in 2026

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.