Altcoins surge after Ethereum’s latest bottom – Is a breakout next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-20Last updated on 2026-02-20

Abstract

Ethereum's recent price drop towards $1,700 triggered fear-driven selling and liquidations across altcoins. However, structurally significant shifts followed: trading volume against stablecoin pairs surged aggressively, buy walls repeatedly absorbed selling pressure, and the market showed signs of accumulation beneath the panic. The OTHERS/BTC pair broke a multi-year bearish trend, while the MACD indicator remained green for two consecutive months—a first in nearly six years. If February closes with a green candle, it could confirm a sustained momentum shift and potentially ignite a broader altcoin rally in the coming months, though Bitcoin holding above its Weekly EMA 200 remains critical factor for confidence.

On 19 February, Ethereum’s price was trading close to $1,932 after falling towards the $1,700s earlier in the month. The decline had been brutal. However, the reaction that followed felt structurally different.

Aggregated altcoin trading volume against stablecoin pairs expanded aggressively while the prices lagged. Strong buy walls formed repeatedly under the price. Retail capitulated into fear-driven selling too.

Therefore, the real question emerged – Was this quiet accumulation beneath visible panic?

Ethereum bottom driving altcoin volume higher

Ethereum’s [ETH] price drop towards $1,700 forced widespread liquidations across altcoins. Weak structures collapsed quickly. Sentiment turned hostile and unforgiving as well.

However, the volume surged during this weakness, instead of fading. That divergence mattered. High participation at depressed prices is often a sign of absorption.

In particular, stablecoin-quoted altcoin volume dwarfed early-cycle 2019–2020 levels. That scale was undeniable. Due to these developments, the structure shifted from pure decline to one of compression.

Buy walls repeatedly absorbed aggressive selling when failure to do so would have triggered further collapse. Instead, the altcoin’s price stabilized on the charts.

Others/Bitcoin breaks multi-year downtrend

OTHERS/BTC broke above a long-standing bullish wedge on the weekly chart. That break followed years of lower highs. The shift was not cosmetic.

Meanwhile, the MACD told a harsher story. Since 2021, it has flipped red after every breakout attempt. Momentum failed repeatedly, and every spark was crushed.

Notably though, the MACD has now stayed green for two consecutive months for the first time in nearly six years. Previously, only the 2021 altcoin season sustained green momentum. Other breakout attempts were sold aggressively.

After years buried in negative territory and extremely oversold conditions, the indicator has finally begun to wake up. The RSI echoed that shift, climbing steadily from oversold levels and printing higher lows.

However, not everyone might be convinced. A full altcoin season requires broader confirmation. Many believe that without Bitcoin holding above the Weekly EMA 200, any rally would remain fragile.

Hence, confidence still depends on Bitcoin holding above the Weekly EMA 200.

Is an altcoin rally imminent?

The ALT/BTC echoed similar strength with a persistent green MACD histogram. That consistency had been absent for years. Therefore, momentum might just be shifting gradually.

However, the prices still remain below prior cycle highs. The structure may be constructive, but incomplete too. February’s close will carry heavy weight for the altcoin.

If February closes green, the implications would extend beyond optics. It would confirm sustained rotation after years of rejection. Looking ahead, that could open the door for an altcoin rally in the coming months as 2026 progresses.


Final Summary

  • Volume expansion and MACD strength hinted at structural accumulation across Ethereum’s charts.
  • A confirmed green February close could ignite broader altcoin momentum.

Related Questions

QWhat was the significance of the high trading volume in altcoins against stablecoin pairs during Ethereum's price decline?

AThe high trading volume during the price decline, instead of fading, indicated strong absorption of selling pressure. This divergence suggested that there was significant buying interest at depressed prices, which is often a sign of accumulation and a potential structural shift from pure decline to compression.

QWhat key technical indicator on the OTHERS/BTC weekly chart showed a positive shift after years of failure?

AThe MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) indicator on the OTHERS/BTC weekly chart stayed green for two consecutive months for the first time in nearly six years. This was significant because previous breakout attempts since 2021 had consistently failed, with the MACD flipping red and momentum being crushed.

QAccording to the article, what is required for a full altcoin season to be confirmed?

AA full altcoin season requires broader confirmation, with many believing that Bitcoin must hold above the Weekly EMA 200 (Exponential Moving Average) for any rally to be sustainable and not remain fragile.

QWhat potential implication does a green monthly close in February hold for altcoins?

AIf February closes green, it would confirm sustained rotation into altcoins after years of rejection, potentially opening the door for an altcoin rally in the coming months as 2026 progresses.

QHow did the market sentiment and structure change during Ethereum's decline to around $1,700?

AThe market sentiment turned hostile and unforgiving, leading to widespread liquidations and weak structures collapsing. However, the structure shifted from a pure decline to one of compression due to strong buy walls repeatedly absorbing aggressive selling, which stabilized altcoin prices and indicated quiet accumulation beneath the visible panic.

Related Reads

VCs on 2025 Crypto Investments: 84% of 118 Tokens Break Issue Price, Only One Type of Company is Quietly Making Money

Crypto investor Ching Tseng categorizes the market into four quadrants based on two axes: crypto-native vs. traditional finance (TradFi)-oriented, and having traction vs. no traction. In 2025, 84.7% of 118 tracked token launches fell below their issuance price, with a median fully diluted valuation drop of 71%. Crypto-native projects without traction are experiencing massive capital destruction, often relying on speculative narratives without sustainable revenue or user retention. Crypto-native teams with traction, often built in prior cycles, generate real revenue but face structural challenges with their tokens lacking direct value capture mechanisms. While some have implemented successful buyback programs, the core issue remains finding growth beyond crypto volatility. TradFi-oriented startups without traction face long, costly enterprise sales cycles but benefit from a robust M&A environment, with crypto acquisitions reaching a record $8.6 billion in 2025. The current winners are TradFi-oriented companies with traction, particularly in the Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization space, which grew from $5.5B to $18.6B in 2025. They are winning through enterprise sales, building alliances, and improving unit economics on established compliance stacks. Their main risk is being bypassed by large incumbent institutions building their own infrastructure. The overarching theme is market maturation, where narrative alone is insufficient for long-term success.

marsbit32m ago

VCs on 2025 Crypto Investments: 84% of 118 Tokens Break Issue Price, Only One Type of Company is Quietly Making Money

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片