Alert: Reports Are Coming In About a Cryptocurrency Exchange Going Bankrupt!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-11Last updated on 2026-08-11

Abstract

Reports indicate potential bankruptcy at cryptocurrency exchange BitMart. Matthew Wang, co-founder and CEO of OpenGradient, claims the exchange is facing withdrawal difficulties, with his market-making team unable to access balances or process withdrawals, raising serious concerns about BitMart's financial health. Wang alleges that approximately a week before announcing its closure, BitMart contacted token projects to run campaigns encouraging token holders to lock their assets on the exchange for six months, offering around 15% annual yield. Wang characterized this last-minute move as a step taken to secure liquidity before the shutdown, suggesting it was an effort to keep funds on the platform.

Matthew Wang, co-founder and CEO of OpenGradient, stated that BitMart is having difficulties with payouts, claiming that their market maker team cannot withdraw funds stored on the exchange.

Wang stated on social media that his team was unable to access the balances on BitMart accounts and could not process withdrawal requests. The OpenGradient executive claimed this raises serious questions about BitMart's financial health.

Wang stated that OpenGradient's market maker team could not withdraw their funds stored on BitMart.

The CEO of OpenGradient stated that the exchange is "going bankrupt" and that the company cannot withdraw its funds from the platform.

Reportedly, BitMart Requested Token Holders to Lock Up Their Assets.

Wang also stated that approximately a week before the closure announcement, BitMart offered some token-utilizing projects campaigns encouraging token holders to lock up their assets on the exchange.

In a screenshot shared by Wang, an account presumably communicating on behalf of BitMart can be seen, offering token holders a six-month locked staking promotion.

The published message indicates that the campaign's annual return is approximately 15 percent, and that one of the goals is to encourage long-term token holding and reduce short-term selling pressure.

The CEO of OpenGradient stated that BitMart used these promotional campaigns to encourage users to store assets on its platform.

Wang characterized the decision to ask token holders to lock up their assets shortly before the exchange's closure as "a step taken to secure liquidity."

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Related Questions

QWho is Matthew Wang and what did he claim about BitMart?

AMatthew Wang is the co-founder and CEO of OpenGradient. He claimed that BitMart is having trouble with payouts, stating that his team of market makers cannot withdraw funds held on the exchange, which raises serious questions about BitMart's financial health.

QWhat specific problem did the OpenGradient team encounter with BitMart according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the OpenGradient team was unable to access account balances on BitMart and could not process withdrawal requests, preventing them from withdrawing their funds.

QWhat action did BitMart reportedly take regarding token holders shortly before the reported shutdown?

AShortly before the reported shutdown, BitMart reportedly asked token holders to lock up their assets on the exchange, offering a six-month locked staking campaign with an approximate annual return of 15 percent.

QWhat was the stated goal of BitMart's campaign to lock up tokens, according to the shared message?

AAccording to the shared message, the stated goals of the campaign were to encourage long-term token holding and reduce selling pressure in the short term.

QHow did Matthew Wang characterize BitMart's request for token holders to lock assets just before closing?

AMatthew Wang characterized BitMart's request for token holders to lock their assets shortly before the exchange's closure as a 'step taken to secure liquidity'.

Related Reads

Supply Skyrockets by 3 Trillion, Veteran Blockchain Harmony Dealt Another Fatal Blow

**Title: Supply Surges by 3 Trillion, Dealing Another Blow to Veteran Blockchain Harmony** A significant security breach has struck the Harmony blockchain, involving the illegal minting of approximately 3 trillion ONE tokens (valued around $23.4 billion), which constitutes about 26% of its total supply. The attack exploited critical logic errors in Harmony's cross-shard receipt verification and signature validation systems, allowing the attacker to forge receipts and bypass security checks. Initial reports indicated around 4 billion tokens were minted, but this figure was later revised drastically upwards as more data became available. A substantial portion of the newly minted tokens was quickly transferred to cryptocurrency exchanges, leading to a sharp price drop of nearly 38% for ONE. Harmony's official response included identifying related wallet addresses, urging exchanges to freeze associated funds, releasing a software patch (v2026.1.1) to prevent further minting, and temporarily halting its cross-chain bridge service. The team is also evaluating the option of a network rollback. This incident marks the third major security or technical issue directly affecting Harmony's token supply in recent years, following a $100 million bridge hack in 2022 and a staking bug in late 2023. Once a notable Layer 1 chain, Harmony's market capitalization has dwindled to around $12 million, with its Total Value Locked (TVL) collapsing from a peak over $1.4 billion to under $170,000. The event underscores the persistent security vulnerabilities faced by smaller blockchain protocols and highlights the importance of scrutinizing a project's security history and on-chain activity.

marsbit1h ago

Supply Skyrockets by 3 Trillion, Veteran Blockchain Harmony Dealt Another Fatal Blow

marsbit1h ago

ENS Has Quietly Completed a 'Self-Revolution'

On August 11th, the ENS DAO officially voted into effect the "Next Era of ENS DAO" proposal. This move by the crucial Ethereum domain name protocol establishes a legal entity, the ENS Foundation, to represent it in the real world—a long-missing piece after nearly a decade of operation. The proposal, initially introduced in June, sparked significant community debate. Critics feared it amounted to the DAO dissolving itself and handing over its treasury. The final version, however, represents a compromise, carefully balancing control. The DAO retains governance over its substantial ENS token holdings and its operational wallet. A $65 million endowment is delegated to the Foundation's Board but protected by a 9-day timelock and a Security Council veto. The DAO also holds ultimate power to appoint and remove Board members. The Foundation's role is to handle tasks the DAO is ill-suited for, such as legal representation, trademark enforcement, and engagement with traditional internet governance bodies like ICANN. This allows ENS Labs, the core development company, to focus on engineering, like the upcoming ENSv2. The five-member Foundation Board includes independent directors with provisions to manage conflicts of interest, particularly regarding funding to ENS Labs. This governance restructuring aims to create a clearer separation of duties: the DAO safeguards protocol neutrality, the Foundation handles real-world operations and diplomacy, and ENS Labs focuses on development. It acknowledges the limitations of pure token voting for day-to-day operations, seeking efficiency through a professionally managed entity with built-in accountability mechanisms. The ENS experiment—aiming to be both credibly neutral and effectively represented in traditional forums—will be closely watched as a potential model for the broader DAO ecosystem.

marsbit1h ago

ENS Has Quietly Completed a 'Self-Revolution'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片