AI sector grows to $14.4B yet Bittensor fades – Will TAO revisit $165?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-08Last updated on 2026-03-08

Abstract

The crypto AI sector's market cap grew from $12.76 billion to $14.42 billion over the past month. However, Bittensor (TAO) has struggled despite a brief rally in mid-February. After an unsuccessful attempt to reach $200 on March 7th, TAO faces bearish pressure. Data shows declining spot demand, negative funding rates, and increased selling pressure, with Open Interest rising 6% in 24 hours. TAO has been trading in a $165–$200 range since February, and current momentum suggests a move toward the $165 support level is likely. Traders may consider range-bound strategies, buying near $160 and selling near $200, until a breakout occurs.

The crypto AI sector tokens showed a relatively bullish performance over the past month. CoinMarketCap data showed that this sector’s market cap has grown from $12.76 billion to $14.42 billion in 30 days.

The performance was particularly noticeable in mid-February.

At that time, TAO rallied nearly 50% within five days, but was unable to keep hold of the gains. Its fortunes have turned since then, at least in the short-term.

TAO speculators expect continued losses

Coinalyze data revealed an Open Interest increase of 6% in the past 24 hours.

Most of these gains came when Bittensor [TAO] rallied toward $200 on Saturday, the 7th of March. This rally was not backed by sustained demand.

The Spot CVD has been in decline over the past week, and the Funding Rate was predominantly negative in March. Together, they highlighted the lack of demand and the overall short-term bearish market sentiment.

On top of the short-term bearishness, TAO has been trading within a range since mid-February. This range reached from $165 to $200.

At the time of writing, the momentum was bearish, and the OBV had slipped below a local support to indicate heightened selling pressure.

Combined with the Bitcoin [BTC] slide back below $70k, it is expected that TAO is headed toward the $165 range lows next.

Traders’ call to action- Use the range

The past month’s liquidation heatmap highlighted the range extremes as being the most obvious magnetic zones near the price. The $160 and $200 areas were places where trades can look to buy and sell, respectively.

It is true that the TAO longer-term trend is bearish. However, traders might benefit from trading the range until it breaks.


Final Summary

  • The attempted TAO rally to $200 on Saturday was quickly thwarted, and $165 seemed to be the next target.
  • The negative funding rates and falling spot CVD highlighted short-term bearishness.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the overall performance of the crypto AI sector's market cap over the past month according to CoinMarketCap?

AThe crypto AI sector's market cap grew from $12.76 billion to $14.42 billion over the past 30 days.

QWhat key price levels defined the trading range for Bittensor (TAO) since mid-February?

ATAO has been trading within a range from $165 to $200 since mid-February.

QWhat two metrics were used to highlight the lack of demand and bearish sentiment for TAO in March?

AThe negative Funding Rate and the declining Spot CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta) were used to highlight the lack of demand and bearish sentiment.

QAccording to the liquidation heatmap, what are the suggested buy and sell zones for TAO traders?

AThe liquidation heatmap suggested the $160 area as a buy zone and the $200 area as a sell zone.

QWhat was the primary reason the TAO rally to $200 on March 7th was unsuccessful?

AThe rally was not backed by sustained demand, as evidenced by the declining Spot CVD and negative funding rates.

Related Reads

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit1h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit1h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit2h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

marsbit2h ago

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

While Meta and Google face investor scrutiny over ballooning AI capital expenditures, Apple's minimal AI investment has paradoxically become a strength. Its market cap recently reclaimed the global top spot, surpassing $5 trillion. The irony is deep: Apple's own AI efforts have lagged, with "Apple Intelligence" delayed and core talent lost, forcing reliance on partners like Google Gemini and Alibaba's Qianwen. Its Q3 FY2026 (Q2 CY) earnings initially seemed stellar. Revenue hit $109.4B (up 16% YoY), with iPhone and Mac sales, growing 22% and 29% respectively, driving most of the growth. However, the stock fell over 8% post-earnings. The primary concern was a weaker Q4 revenue growth forecast of 9-11%, below expectations, due to looming supply chain constraints. Apple is feeling the indirect cost of the AI boom. Soaring memory and chip prices, fueled by massive data center investments from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, are forcing Apple to raise Mac and iPad prices significantly. The upcoming iPhone launch is also expected to see substantial price hikes. Despite avoiding heavy AI infrastructure spending—its capital expenditures are actually down 28%—Apple cannot escape the industry-wide supply and cost pressures. While Apple's operating cash flow remains robust, its substantial R&D spending (up 32% YoY) has yet to yield major AI breakthroughs. As Tim Cook prepares to step down as CEO, Apple faces a challenging transition: balancing its premium hardware success against the strategic and cost pressures of the AI era it has so far cautiously navigated.

marsbit3h ago

Low Investment Isn't Apple's Immunity Pass

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片