A Western Scholar's Field Notes from Visiting Chinese AI Labs: Humility, Openness, No Philosophy, Just Wanting to Train Better Models

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

An Impressed Western Scholar's Observations from a Tour of Chinese AI Labs: Humility, Openness, and Pragmatism A visiting Western academic's key takeaways from touring numerous Chinese AI companies highlight striking differences from the US ecosystem. Researchers in China displayed deep humility, frequently praising competitors like DeepSeek with genuine admiration. They operate in a remarkably open and collaborative atmosphere, often sharing research publicly, contrasting with the more guarded, zero-sum competition perceived in the West. The primary focus is intensely pragmatic: training better models. Philosophical debates about AI's societal impact or consciousness are largely absent; the drive is purely technical. Researchers are young, often PhD students working in industry, and are highly online and tool-savvy. Their passion is palpable when users engage with their models. Public sentiment also differs, with Chinese citizens showing greater optimism about AI's benefits compared to Western skepticism. While major closed-source players exist, the prevalence of open-source models fosters a unique cooperative spirit. The visit left the author optimistic about the future of open AI research and hopeful for increased international collaboration.

Author:Florian Brand

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide TechFlow Introduction: The context of this article is that SAIL (a media alliance that brings together top AI writers from Substack, including members like Nathan Lambert, Sebastian Raschka, ChinaTalk, etc.) organized a visit to Chinese AI labs. The author, Florian, joined the group and visited over a dozen companies including Moon's Dark Side, Xiaomi, MiniMax, Zhipu AI, Meituan, Alibaba, Ant Group, ModelScope, 01.AI, Unitree Robotics, and others. These are his impressions.

Florian Brand is a PhD student at Trier University and the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), focusing on the application and evaluation of large language models.

While not "famous" per se, he has some visibility within the open-source AI community. It's quite interesting to see the Chinese AI ecosystem from the first-person perspective of a foreign AI practitioner.

Main Text

For the past 10 days or so, I've had the privilege of visiting AI labs in China with my SAIL companions. As someone who visited both China and the US for the first time in six months, I found the differences fascinating, but the similarities were even more so.

What left the strongest impression on me was how humble all the AI researchers I met were.

They spoke highly of other labs and their peers. DeepSeek was mentioned frequently, likely because they had just released a model a few days before our visit. People talked about DeepSeek's paper with genuine admiration.

Many researchers are close friends with each other, hailing from the same university or hometown. They discuss their work candidly, with research results published as papers months later.

This is one of the biggest differences from the Western AI scene. In the U.S., the atmosphere often feels more like a zero-sum game. Labs are careful about positioning. Researchers think about competition, and some hold themselves in high regard. Leaders insult and attack each other in leaked memos. This difference might be explained by the fact that leading U.S. labs are closed-source, while many Chinese labs are open-source. Chinese labs have "a healthy respect" for ByteDance's Doubao, the most widely used chatbot, which is closed-source and holds a significant lead.

Meanwhile, the overall atmosphere is strikingly similar to San Francisco. Researchers are extremely online, reading extensively on Twitter and the increasingly popular Xiaohongshu. They all use Claude Code or their own CLIs to build the next model. Some monitored training runs during our meetings, watching the reward curves climb. They are thinking about further scaling and complaining about insufficient compute. They are frustrated with the current state of benchmarks.

Their main focus is training better models. This differs from San Francisco, where researchers ponder the political or philosophical implications of AI. They don't think about mass unemployment, a permanent underclass, or whether their models are conscious. They just want to train excellent models.

Their eyes light up when they hear you've used their model. They are eager to fix all the flaws of the current model in the next generation. They work overnight to push out model releases, yet still show up in the office afterwards.

Most researchers I met were young, many in their early 20s or around 25. Some were undergraduates, but more commonly they were PhD students working in the industry simultaneously. The consensus was that the industry is more interesting than academia right now, a view I strongly share, as I've done exactly the same thing. Labs place great importance on acquiring this kind of talent, actively recruiting interns and graduate students; something Western labs often don't do.

The researchers' optimism extends to the general public, who seem much more optimistic about technology and the future of AI and robotics. During the trip, people shared stories about their parents and grandparents using Doubao and DeepSeek for all sorts of tasks, including discussing mathematical theorems. This is noticeably different from the West, where the general public harbors animosity towards AI.

Overall, this trip gave me a tiny glimpse into this ecosystem. It's impossible to understand the culture of such a vast civilization in a few days. As a strong supporter of an open AI ecosystem and open research, I'm very optimistic about the future of both and hope for a lot of international collaboration ahead.

I want to thank all the amazing people we met at Moon's Dark Side, Xiaomi, MiniMax, Zhipu AI, Meituan, Alibaba, Ant Group's Lingxi, ModelScope, 01.AI, Unitree Robotics, and other places. Thank you for your time and warm hospitality. Also, thank you to SAIL for organizing the trip and to all the writers and journalists who participated. I'm incredibly grateful to have met so many outstanding and driven individuals in such a short time.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the most prominent difference between the attitudes of AI researchers in China and those in the West, as described in the article?

AThe most prominent difference is the mindset and focus. Chinese AI researchers were described as humble, collaborative, and openly admiring of each other's work, with a primary focus on simply training better models. In contrast, the Western AI scene (particularly the US) is portrayed as more of a zero-sum game, with labs being guarded about their positioning, researchers thinking about competition, and a greater tendency for leaders to engage in public disputes. Western researchers are also noted to spend more time contemplating the political and philosophical implications of AI.

QAccording to the author's observations, what is the primary focus of the AI researchers he met in China?

AThe primary and overwhelming focus of the AI researchers in China is on training better models. They are intensely practical, thinking about scaling, complaining about insufficient compute, and are frustrated with the current state of benchmarks. Unlike their Western counterparts, they do not spend significant time considering large-scale philosophical or political questions about AI, such as unemployment, societal class structures, or machine consciousness.

QHow does the article characterize the relationship between Chinese AI labs and the concept of 'open source'?

AThe article notes that many leading Chinese AI labs are open source, which is presented as a key factor contributing to their collaborative and less secretive culture. This is contrasted with the US, where leading labs are largely closed-source. The article mentions that even within China, the closed-source chatbot 'Doubao' from ByteDance is viewed with some apprehension by other labs due to its large lead and widespread usage.

QWhat demographic trend did the author observe among the researchers he met in Chinese AI labs?

AThe author observed that most of the researchers he met were very young, often in their early 20s or around 25 years old. Many were undergraduates or, more commonly, PhD students who were simultaneously working in the industry. There was a consensus that industry work is more interesting than academia, a view the author shares. Chinese labs actively recruit such young talent through internships and graduate programs, a practice the author notes is not common among Western labs.

QHow does the public sentiment towards AI in China compare to that in the West, based on the author's account?

ABased on anecdotal stories shared during the trip, the general public in China appears to be more optimistic and positive about technology and the prospects of AI and robotics. The author heard stories of parents and grandparents using AI chatbots like Doubao and DeepSeek for various practical tasks. This stands in stark contrast to the West, where the author states there is a prevailing sentiment of 'distaste' for AI among the general public.

Related Reads

5 Lessons from 'The Odyssey' for Traders: Strategy, Discipline, and How to Survive in the Market

"The Odyssey" offers timeless lessons for traders on strategy, discipline, and market survival. This article draws parallels between the epic's themes and the core principles of trading. First, **strategy over brute force** is key. Odysseus’s cunning escapes, like from the Cyclops, highlight that a market view must translate into a concrete plan with entry, exit, position sizing, and failure conditions. Over-trading often harms performance more than it helps. Second, facing **temptation and self-control**, Odysseus had himself tied to the mast *before* hearing the Sirens. Similarly, pre-set trading rules (like stop-losses) are more reliable than willpower in the heat of the moment, preventing emotionally-driven decisions. Third, managing **risk and trade-offs** is crucial. Odysseus chose a limited loss (losing six men to Scylla) to avoid total disaster (Charybdis). In trading, position sizing ensures a loss doesn't prevent future trades, as recovering from large drawdowns becomes exponentially harder. Fourth, the ability to **adapt to change** is vital. Odysseus faced unique challenges requiring different tactics. Markets also change; a strategy effective in one environment (e.g., a trend) may fail in another (e.g., a range). The key is distinguishing when a strategy needs adjustment from normal short-term variance. Finally, success is measured by the **entire journey**, not single events. A decade-long voyage or a series of trades defines performance, not one win or loss. Consistency and long-term metrics matter more than any single trade. Ultimately, a reliable trading system isn't about always being right, but about containing mistakes within manageable limits, ensuring survival and the chance to succeed over the long term—much like Odysseus's arduous but ultimately successful return home.

marsbit2m ago

5 Lessons from 'The Odyssey' for Traders: Strategy, Discipline, and How to Survive in the Market

marsbit2m ago

Current State of Web3 Projects: 200 Projects Cease Updates Monthly, Only 70 New Ones Emerge

The article discusses a significant decline in active Web3 projects, based on data from RootData's "2026 Crypto Industry Dead Project Collection." It highlights that approximately 200 projects cease social media updates monthly, while only 70-100 new ones emerge, indicating a net loss in the active project count since mid-2025. RootData's methodology for identifying "dead" projects relies on three objective criteria: official announcements of shutdown, over six months of inactivity across key platforms (like X and Discord), or the inability to access official websites/social accounts. Over 70% of identified dead projects fall into the long-term inactivity category. Currently, RootData tracks over 20,000 crypto projects, with only about 2,200 considered active based on August social media updates. The analysis suggests the crypto industry is undergoing a deep consolidation phase. While infrastructure projects are declining among new entries (now under 10%), new projects are increasingly focused on application and distribution layers, with over 65% in categories like prediction markets, RWA cards, tokenized stocks, perpetual contracts, AI agents, and memecoins. The article concludes that this shakeout, driven by reduced VC funding, may force greater focus on sustainable business models and real user demand, potentially strengthening the ecosystem's long-term health.

marsbit1h ago

Current State of Web3 Projects: 200 Projects Cease Updates Monthly, Only 70 New Ones Emerge

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片