A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbitPublished on 2026-08-03Last updated on 2026-08-03

Abstract

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress f...

Original Author: Li Jia

Original Source: Wall Street News Agency

This week, the United States, Japan, and South Korea jointly conducted the largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly three decades. This action not only targeted the depreciation pressures on the Japanese yen and the South Korean won but was also seen as an important US measure to stabilize the financial markets of its Japanese and South Korean allies and prevent risk spillover.

This action covered two major Asian currencies, the yen and the won. Both Japanese and South Korean foreign exchange authorities supported their currencies by selling US dollars; the US intervened in the yen exchange rate through non-dollar channels, selling euros and buying yen to ease yen depreciation pressure and avoid putting pressure on the dollar.

Currently, Japanese and South Korean markets remain under pressure: the South Korean KOSDAQ index fell to its lowest point since October 2022, with significant adjustments in the technology sector; the exchange rates of the Japanese yen and the South Korean won against the US dollar also weakened consecutively, raising market concerns that further depreciation could trigger chain reactions in Asian assets.

Unlike past interventions aimed solely at stabilizing exchange rates, this coordinated action was viewed by the market as a "market rescue" operation targeting Japanese and South Korean financial markets. Amid persistent pressure on Japanese and South Korean stock markets and significant adjustments in the technology sector, the United States hopes to boost market confidence and prevent further risk transmission by stabilizing exchange rate expectations.

Both Japan and South Korea are key participants in the US semiconductor and AI supply chains. Stabilizing their asset markets helps reduce the possibility of financial risks spreading to the technology industrial chain and the US market.

US, Japan, South Korea Rarely Coordinate to Intervene in FX Market; Yen, Won Surge

According to the UK's Financial Times, on July 31st, the US Treasury, via the New York Federal Reserve, commissioned Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to sell euros and buy yen, marking the first direct US participation in yen intervention in nearly 30 years.

Previously, it was reported that Japanese authorities had used approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion) to intervene in the FX market on July 30th alone. Additionally, according to Reuters, South Korean foreign exchange authorities also made a rare move into the market to sell US dollars on the same day, pushing the won up 2% in a single day to a nine-month high.

Driven by the tripartite joint effort, the USD/JPY pair quickly fell from above 162 to the 157-159 range, with the yen clearly moving away from its 40-year lows. South Korea's Vice Finance Minister Moon Ji-sung stated that South Korea is maintaining close coordination with the US and Japan; Japan's Vice Minister of Finance for International Affairs, Atsushi Mimura, also noted that US support had gone "beyond mere moral support."

US First Directly Participates in Yen Intervention, Sending Policy Signal

The US Treasury's direct intervention in the yen exchange rate is the market's most noted change. Unlike the past, which relied mainly on verbal warnings, the US has this time, unusually, participated in yen intervention through actual transactions.

According to the Financial Times citing informed sources, the New York Fed implemented the intervention through Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley selling euros and buying yen. Before the action, the US Treasury had signaled to several Wall Street institutions about a possible intervention and maintained communication with the European Central Bank.

Formal market entry was preceded by the New York Fed releasing policy signals for two consecutive days. On Thursday, the New York Fed conducted a "rate check" on USD/JPY, i.e., asking dealers for current tradable exchange rates without immediately executing trades; on Friday, it shifted to a "rate check" on EUR/JPY. The market widely regarded this operation as a precursor to formal intervention.

New York Fed's "Rate Check" Operation Explores New FX Intervention Method

Alex Cohen, a forex strategist at Bank of America Securities, stated in a report that the "rate check" falls between verbal intervention and actual intervention. It is a new tool the US Treasury began using this year to signal policy to the market without actually deploying funds. However, he also cautioned that without follow-up actual actions for support, the market may still test the authorities' policy credibility again.

Notably, the New York Fed partially chose the EUR/JPY pair for operation this time, not USD/JPY. Analysis suggests that this shows the US may hope to exert influence through non-dollar currency channels, easing yen depreciation pressure while avoiding putting additional pressure on the US dollar.

On the Japanese side, they had already intervened in the FX market on a large scale earlier. According to official data and market estimates, Japanese authorities used about 8.45 trillion yen (approximately $52.8 billion) on July 30th to support the yen, marking another large-scale intervention following the cumulative injection of about 11.7 trillion yen from April to May this year.

US Goal Not Solely to Stabilize Exchange Rate, But to Maintain Asset Stability of AI Allies

The significance of the US intervention this time may go beyond traditional FX intervention.

Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett stated in his latest report that this US-Japan-South Korea coordination resembles an "AI-era Price Keeping Operation (PKO)," with the core objective of preventing assets of AI industrial chain allies like Japan and South Korea from remaining under persistent pressure.

Hartnett believes that the US hopes to mitigate three types of risks: First, preventing rapid yen depreciation from driving sharp increases in Japanese government bond yields; Second, avoiding the spread of financial stress to Asian markets like South Korea and Japan; Third, reducing the impact of disorderly capital flows on the US bond market.

Recently, pressure in the South Korean market has clearly increased. The KOSDAQ index fell to its lowest point since October 2022, and shares of major South Korean securities firms have also been adjusting continuously.

Meanwhile, the AI investment boom has not shown clear signs of cooling down. Bank of America data shows that semiconductor ETFs have attracted approximately $53 billion in net inflows this year. Although the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) recently retreated, investors continue to bet on the long-term growth of the AI industrial chain.

Hartnett believes that the coordinated intervention coinciding with market adjustments may indicate that previous highly leveraged trading is coming to an end. However, current policies are more about controlling market volatility rather than changing the trend through liquidity policies.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is a key difference between this coordinated intervention by the US, Japan, and South Korea and past actions?

AUnlike past actions focused solely on currency stabilization, this intervention is perceived as a broader 'market rescue' operation. It aims to stabilize Japanese and South Korean financial markets, boost confidence, and prevent risk spillover, particularly to safeguard critical AI and semiconductor supply chain partners.

QHow did the U.S. Treasury Department directly intervene in the yen market, and why was this method considered significant?

AThe U.S. Treasury, through the New York Fed, directed Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to sell euros and buy yen. This was significant because it was the first direct U.S. participation in yen intervention in nearly 30 years, moving beyond verbal warnings to actual market transactions.

QWhat new policy tool did the New York Federal Reserve use prior to the intervention, and what was its purpose?

AThe New York Fed conducted 'rate checks' on USD/JPY and then EUR/JPY exchange rates. This tool, described as intermediate between verbal and actual intervention, is used to signal policy intent to the market without committing funds, serving as a precursor to potential formal action.

QWhat major risk does the article suggest the U.S. is trying to mitigate by stabilizing Japanese and South Korean assets?

AThe article suggests the U.S. aims to mitigate the risk of financial stress in Japan and South Korea spilling over to their AI and semiconductor supply chains, which are crucial to the U.S., and to prevent disorderly capital flows from impacting the U.S. bond market.

QHow much did the Japanese authorities reportedly spend to support the yen on July 30, and how does this compare to their previous interventions?

AJapanese authorities reportedly spent approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion) on July 30. This follows a cumulative intervention of about 11.7 trillion yen between April and May of the same year, indicating another large-scale operation.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit54m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit54m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit54m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit54m ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbit1h ago

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片