Polygon holds KEY support after 100M POL burn: What’s next?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-21Last updated on 2026-02-21

Abstract

Polygon (POL) has burned 100 million tokens, a major deflationary milestone aimed at reducing supply and supporting price. Despite this, the altcoin's inflation remains elevated, indicating persistent sell pressure. POL's price increased 4.06% to $0.108, flipping the short-term EMA20 and showing bullish momentum, backed by a 17% rise in trading volume. Key indicators like the Stochastic RSI suggest strong buying interest but also significant seller presence. For a sustained bullish move, POL needs to close above $0.11. However, high exchange supply and a declining Stock-to-Flow ratio highlight ongoing downside risks, with a potential pullback to $0.106 if momentum fades.

Polygon [POL] continued to trade within a thin margin, still holding the $0.10 support level. The altcoin flipped its short-term moving average EMA20, signaling strengthening momentum.

At the time of writing, POL traded at $0.108, up 4.06% on the daily charts. This slight price uptick was backed by a 17% jump in trading volume, indicating increased on-chain activity.

Polygon burns 100M tokens

With POL struggling to hold an upside momentum, Polygon has continued to deploy its major deflationary tool to absorb market pressure.

According to the official report, Polygon has achieved a major milestone, burning 100 million POL. Typically, token burns help shrink the circulating supply, reduce inflation, and thus accelerate an asset’s upside momentum.

Even more importantly, sustained token burns reflect higher fees and network revenue, a sign of increased network usage and adoption.

In fact, at the time of writing, Daily Fees and Revenue have stabilized above $200k, with App Fees holding above $500k. When network revenue continues to rise, it suggests higher network participation and actual demand.

A network with sustained demand can boost its native token, potentially driving prices higher.

Any impact on POL price action?

In the short term, Polygon’s token burns have tended to positively impact POL’s price, as the altcoin slightly jumped from the lower boundary.

Notably, the altcoin’s Stochastic RSI made a bullish crossover and rose to 88.27 as of writing, although its signal line remained around 88.

With Stoch rising to such levels, it suggested strong upside momentum as demand stepped into the market. However, the signal remained roughly the same, suggesting a strong seller presence.

Such market conditions indicate a fierce struggle between bulls and bears for market control. For a bullish takeover, POL buyers must push for a daily close above the EMA 20 and EMA 50 at $0.11, setting up a move towards $0.12.

However, if the momentum turns short-lived and sellers cash out these minor gains, the altcoin will pull back towards $0.106.

Inflo remains elevated

Interestingly, despite continued token burns, POL’s inflation remains extremely elevated, signaling higher sell pressure. According to Santiment data, the altcoin’s Stock-to-Flow Ratio continued to decline, falling to 8.6 at press time.

A drop in SFR suggests low scarcity and increased immediate supply. A high supply presents a significant selling pressure in the market.

Even more so, the altcoin’s Exchange Supply Ratio surged to a monthly high of 0.003. When ESR rises, it suggests that a significant amount of Polygon has recently flowed into exchanges.

Therefore, sellers are more active than buyers on exchanges, further straining the already overwhelmed market. Typically, such market conditions tend to accelerate downside momentum, leading to lower prices.


Final Summary

  • Polygon reaches a major deflationary milestone by burning 100 million POL tokens, though inflation remains elevated.
  • POL rose 4% on daily charts, flipping EMA20, indicating short-term bullish momentum.

Related Questions

QWhat was the price impact on POL after the 100 million token burn, and what key support level did it hold?

APOL was trading at $0.108, up 4.06% on the daily charts, and it held the key $0.10 support level.

QWhat is the primary purpose of a token burn, and what does sustained burning activity indicate about a network?

AThe primary purpose of a token burn is to shrink the circulating supply, reduce inflation, and potentially accelerate an asset's upside momentum. Sustained burns reflect higher fees and network revenue, which is a sign of increased network usage and adoption.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what must POL buyers achieve to confirm a bullish takeover and target a move towards $0.12?

AFor a bullish takeover, POL buyers must push for a daily close above the EMA 20 and EMA 50 at $0.11.

QDespite the token burn, why does the article suggest that POL still faces significant selling pressure?

APOL faces significant selling pressure because its Stock-to-Flow Ratio declined, indicating low scarcity and increased immediate supply. Furthermore, its Exchange Supply Ratio surged, meaning more tokens are flowing into exchanges, which typically signals that sellers are more active than buyers.

QWhat two key metrics related to network fees and revenue are mentioned, and what were their approximate values?

AThe two key metrics are Daily Fees and Revenue, which stabilized above $200k, and App Fees, which held above $500k.

Related Reads

Crypto’s Investable Universe Is Shrinking: NYDIG

According to NYDIG's Head of Research Greg Cipolaro, the crypto industry's investable universe is shrinking as markets mature. He argues that only a limited set of blockchain applications can attract sustained capital, suggesting the broader Web3 vision may need recalibration. Investors are now focusing on applications that extend traditional financial products onto blockchain infrastructure, including Bitcoin, tokenized assets, stablecoins, select DeFi infrastructure, and general-purpose blockchains like Ethereum. Cipolaro emphasizes that blockchain’s core attributes—trustlessness, permissionlessness, and censorship resistance—align best with financial use cases, where they provide clear advantages over centralized systems. He notes that most non-financial applications, such as gaming or social media, don’t require global immutable ledgers and are more efficiently served by centralized alternatives. This shift has led to capital concentration around fewer, stronger narratives, increasing Bitcoin’s market dominance while reducing investment in speculative altcoins. Cipolaro views this trend as market consolidation rather than collapse, with a focus on economically sustainable applications. A smaller, more durable market grounded in financial utility may enhance long-term stability and attract institutional interest. The crypto space may ultimately function as a specialized financial technology layer rather than a comprehensive Web3 overhaul. The next phase of development will likely emphasize real-world utility, regulatory clarity, and prudent capital allocation over rapid narrative expansion.

TheNewsCrypto29m ago

Crypto’s Investable Universe Is Shrinking: NYDIG

TheNewsCrypto29m ago

Don't Just Focus on Trading Volume, Learn to Understand the 'True and False Prosperity' of Perpetual Contracts

Title: Look Beyond Trading Volume: Understanding the Real Growth of Perpetual Contracts Perpetual contracts (perps) have become a dominant force in crypto trading, with their volume now accounting for about 75% of decentralized exchange activity, up from 44% in February 2025. This surge occurred even as the total crypto market cap fell nearly 40% between August 2025 and February 2026, indicating a shift towards derivatives for speculation and hedging during volatility. However, volume alone can be misleading. It may reflect high-frequency, incentive-driven activity rather than meaningful capital deployment. A more nuanced view comes from combining volume with Open Interest (OI)—the total value of outstanding contracts. While cumulative perps volume doubled in the past six months to $14 trillion (exceeding the previous four years' total), OI grew by about 50%, from $13B to ~$18B before settling at $13B. The OI/Volume ratio, a measure of capital efficiency, rose from 0.33x to 0.49x over the past year. This growth wasn’t linear: it peaked at ~0.72x from June to mid-October 2025, then dropped to ~0.38x after a major liquidation event in October wiped out $19B in leveraged positions. At the platform level, Hyperliquid leads in capital efficiency with an OI/7-day volume ratio over 45% and a take rate of 3.2 bps, effectively converting trading activity into sustained positions and fee revenue. Aster follows with a 34% ratio but a lower take rate of 1.6 bps, prioritizing capital retention over revenue. edgeX and Lighter both show 21% efficiency, with edgeX matching Hyperliquid’s take rate. The key insight is that true growth in perps markets is signaled not just by volume but by rising OI/Volume ratio, reflecting patient capital and confidence in these platforms. Sustainable success will come from optimizing conviction and value capture, not just incentivized trading volume.

marsbit1h ago

Don't Just Focus on Trading Volume, Learn to Understand the 'True and False Prosperity' of Perpetual Contracts

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片