The Domestic Answer to Space Computing Power: Photonics Are More Efficient, Musk and Huang's Approaches Are Too Roundabout

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-28Last updated on 2026-06-28

Abstract

The Space Computing Race: A Photonic Advantage The competition for space-based computing has intensified, with figures like Elon Musk and NVIDIA's Jensen Huang highlighting its potential. Musk predicts solar-powered AI satellites could offer the most cost-effective computing by 2032. However, space presents extreme challenges for traditional electronic chips: radiation from cosmic particles can cause errors, the vacuum environment hinders heat dissipation, and limited solar power constrains energy-hungry systems. Photonic computing, using light instead of electrons, offers a promising solution. Its core advantages for space are threefold: 1) **Radiation Resistance**: Photons are charge-neutral, making them inherently immune to particle interference. 2) **Low Heat Generation**: Light propagation in waveguides generates minimal heat, bypassing critical thermal management issues. 3) **Low Power Consumption**: Photonic chips have near-zero static power draw, aligning perfectly with the energy constraints of satellites. Furthermore, for a given payload weight and volume, photonic systems can potentially deliver higher total compute density. Since they require less bulky cooling and power infrastructure, more space can be allocated to the compute units themselves. While photonic computing holds great promise, current industry approaches face hurdles like the memory-compute bottleneck (separate storage and processing) and challenges in large-scale integration. Engineering for sp...

The race for space computing power has turned into a real arms race.

Musk estimates that by 2032, solar-powered space AI satellites will become the world's most cost-effective computing power solution.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's statement in March this year, in a way, defined the nature of this race — intelligence must exist wherever data is generated.

After these two giants made their moves, the battlefield of space computing power has been pushed to an unprecedented height, but the engineering challenges facing space computing are still far more brutal than those on the ground.

Without air convection, chips can't dissipate heat; the universe contains high-energy particles that can cause chip errors at any time......

△Domestic and Foreign Computing Satellites (AI-assisted generation)

On the other side, Musk has also been revealed to have new developments — his company SpaceX is considering acquiring the optical module company Mesh.

The main business of Mesh, which caught Musk's eye, is the mass production of optical transceivers to improve the communication efficiency of AI data centers, thereby enhancing quality and efficiency.

Why Optical Computing is Naturally Suited for Space

In the space computing power race, chips face much harsher challenges than on the ground. Computing payloads must overcome three hurdles — radiation, heat dissipation, and power consumption.

Traditional electronic chips rely on charge storage and silicon-based transistors to operate, while space is filled with a large number of cosmic high-energy particles.

Once high-energy particles strike a chip, they can cause single-event upsets, single-event latch-ups, and other effects, leading to calculation errors or even device failure.

Optical computing chips fundamentally bypass this hurdle.

Optical computing uses photons as carriers for computational information. Photons themselves carry no charge, making them inherently immune to direct interference from high-energy particle impacts and eliminating the need for special radiation shielding designs.

Heat dissipation is the second hurdle, and arguably the trickiest one.

When traditional electronic chips operate, electron transport through wires and transistor switching inevitably generate heat. AI tasks place immense demands on data movement and computation, keeping the power consumption and heat generation of electronic chips high.

Space is a vacuum environment with no air convection, leaving only heat conduction and thermal radiation as heat dissipation pathways.

These stringent thermal constraints can easily lead to traditional chips throttling performance or even failing.

Optical computing chips operate in a fundamentally different way. Light propagates through waveguides to perform calculations, a process that generates almost no heat.

The third hurdle is power consumption.

Satellites in orbit rely heavily on solar panels for power. During orbital shadow periods, they depend solely on onboard batteries, making energy supply extremely limited.

The greater the energy consumption of high-performance computing chips, the larger the required solar panel area, which in turn increases satellite weight, volume, and launch costs.

The static power consumption of optical computing chips theoretically approaches zero, making them a natural fit for the stringent energy constraints of satellites, thus bypassing half of this hurdle.

The three characteristics of optical computing — radiation resistance, low heat generation, and low power consumption — are "killer features" in the space environment that help space computing directly leap over the technological obstacles of its initial stages.

After crossing these three hurdles, optical computing possesses another system-level advantage in space scenarios that is difficult for electronic computing to match —

Under the same payload weight, optical computing can deliver a higher total computing power.

The core constraint of moving ground-based data centers into space is the weight and volume of the payload.

The entire architecture of traditional servers is designed for terrestrial forms. Sending computing power into space — computing chips, storage, CPUs, along with the supporting cooling systems, radiation shielding layers... each component occupies precious payload space, leaving little room for actual computation.

NVIDIA's proposed solution is to integrate the CPU and GPU, achieving relatively impressive computing power within an extremely small size and weight. The Space-1 Vera Rubin module is a continuation of this approach.

But optical computing can go even further.

Because optical computing chips inherently generate low heat and consume little power, the required supporting cooling structures and power systems can be made lighter and smaller. Within a payload of equal weight, optical computing can accommodate more computing power.

Therefore, under the same energy supply and thermal conditions, optical computing achieves a higher total computing power than electronic computing.

△Three Major Advantages of Optical Computing in Space Scenarios (AI-assisted generation)

According to Pu Huanan, Deputy Dean of the Photonics-Centric Science and Technology Research Institute, there is profound intrinsic motivation behind this advantage.

The performance progress of electronic computing chips has long relied on process node scaling — integrating more transistors in the same area to increase computational density through finer interconnects.

However, this path has a physical limit. When the gate spacing of transistors shrinks to a certain extent, the quantum tunneling effect inevitably emerges.

Electrons can tunnel through theoretically insurmountable potential barriers, causing leakage current and computational errors. This is an inherent physical ceiling that electronic computing cannot bypass.

Optical computing follows a completely different path.

The fabrication of optical computing chips does not rely on the advanced process system dominated by extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines. Existing 45nm and above, even sub-micron, processes can meet the fabrication needs of optical computing chips.

The improvement of optical computing power relies on scaling up the optical computing architecture and fully utilizing the multiple multiplexing dimensions inherent to photons themselves, such as wavelength, polarization, and optical modes.

On this path, the heat generation and power consumption of optical computing remain stable, costs can be effectively controlled, and the ceiling for computing power is far from being reached.

Photonics Breakthrough: From Ground to On-Orbit Inference

Photons are the core carriers of optical computing.

The fundamental idea of optical computing is to use photons instead of electrons to perform the most crucial part of AI inference computation — the vast number of matrix operations.

The advantage of optical computing chips is that a single light propagation can simultaneously complete a large batch of such multiplication operations, extremely fast, and generating almost no heat.

However, looking across the industry, most optical computing solutions still have a gap compared to electronic computing in terms of being truly scalable, general-purpose, and stably deployable.

Two of the most prominent issues are:

  • First, the separation of memory and computing persists. During AI inference, model parameters frequently need to be moved from external memory to the computing unit, making memory bandwidth the bottleneck of the entire system;

  • Second, challenges in scaling and integration. Limited by the physical constraints of silicon photonics platforms regarding chip size, warpage, and interconnect density, traditional optical computing solutions face difficulties in scaling computing power.

These two thresholds mean optical computing still has some distance to go to match the mature and comprehensive computing ecosystem of electronic chips.

△Photonics-Centric Technology's Photonic In-Memory Computing Architecture

△Photonics-Centric Technology's Multi-Layer Packaged Glass-Based Optical Computing System

But from the ground to space, Pu Huanan believes that "optical computing needs to cross another hurdle of engineering."

The vibration during the rocket launch phase is extremely intense. Compared to pure electronic chips, optical structures introduce more packaging components, posing an additional test for the structural stability of chips under high-intensity vibration.

Once in orbit, the optical computing system needs to undergo system-level validation for power, thermal control, and communication in the real space environment.

Optical Computing & Optical Interconnects: The Next Trump Card for Space Computing Power

This path is similar in logic to NVIDIA's evolution from a single GPU to cluster-level solutions, but the underlying technological routes are fundamentally different.

Looking at the entire space-based computing industry, current development is still in an extremely early stage, with a considerable distance to go before large-scale commercial deployment.

Technology validation, system integration, and scale deployment — each link still has numerous engineering challenges to overcome.

Limited power resources on satellite platforms, iteration cycles for space chips, and low-cost large-scale orbit insertion are all thresholds that must be crossed for space-based computing to move from experimentation to commercialization.

Only when the comprehensive cost of space-based computing is lower than ground-based computing, or when space-based scenarios can provide high-value services irreplaceable by ground-based ones, will there be a real driving force for widespread commercialization.

The race for space computing power has just begun. The technological path chosen for computing chips and systems will determine the capability ceiling of future computing constellations.

As electronic computing gradually hits its ceiling facing process limits, optical computing and optical interconnects might be the crucial card in this race to bypass physical constraints and carve out a differentiated path.

This article is from WeChat Official Account: Quantum Bit , Author: Following Frontier Technology, Original Title: "The Domestic Answer to Space Computing Power: Photonics Are More Efficient! Musk and Huang's Approaches Are Too Roundabout"

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the three key engineering challenges for computing chips in space, and why is optical computing naturally suited to overcome them?

AThe three key challenges are radiation, heat dissipation, and power consumption. Optical computing overcomes them because photons are charge-neutral (making them immune to radiation effects), generate minimal heat during calculation, and have near-zero static power consumption, aligning perfectly with the limited power and harsh thermal environment of space.

QAccording to the article, what is the core limitation for moving ground-based data centers to space, and how do optical computing chips offer a weight/volume advantage over electronic chips?

AThe core limitation is the weight and volume of the payload. Optical computing chips offer an advantage because their low heat generation and power consumption allow for smaller, lighter cooling and energy supply systems. Therefore, within the same payload weight, more optical computing units can be installed, delivering higher total computational power.

QWhat are the two main obstacles that most optical computing solutions currently face in becoming widely deployable, as mentioned in the article?

AThe two main obstacles are: 1) The separation of storage and computation, where the frequent transfer of model parameters from external memory creates a bandwidth bottleneck. 2) Difficulties in large-scale integration due to physical constraints of silicon photonic platforms, such as chip size and interconnection density.

QWhat fundamental physical limit does electronic chip performance eventually face, and how does the path for improving optical computing performance differ?

AElectronic chip performance faces the quantum tunneling effect, where electrons can leak through barriers as transistor gates shrink to atomic scales, causing errors. Optical computing, in contrast, doesn't rely on advanced nanometer-scale processes. Its performance improvement comes from scaling the optical computing architecture and utilizing multiple properties of photons (like wavelength, polarization) for parallel processing, with a much higher theoretical ceiling.

QWhy does the article suggest that Elon Musk's reported interest in acquiring optical module company Mesh is relevant to the space computing race?

AMesh specializes in mass-producing optical transceivers to improve communication efficiency within AI data centers. This move by Musk's SpaceX suggests a strategic focus on optimizing data transfer, which is a critical component for high-performance computing clusters in space. It highlights the importance of both optical computation and optical communication ("light compute, light interconnect") for future space-based compute constellations.

Related Reads

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

The article analyzes the shifting profit dynamics and power balance between Apple and memory suppliers like Micron within the iPhone supply chain. It highlights a social media post criticizing Apple for raising iPhone prices while blaming memory chip cost increases, despite historically paying suppliers like Micron very little. An estimated iPhone 18 cost breakdown is referenced. Historically, memory was a minor cost component. In 2017's iPhone X, memory accounted for only about 1.6-2.3% of the price, with Apple capturing nearly 50% net profit. Over time, memory's share of the Bill-of-Materials (BOM) cost has grown significantly, reaching an estimated 12-15% for the iPhone 17 series. The core driver of this change is soaring demand for memory from the AI industry, particularly for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and AI servers, which is diverting production capacity and squeezing supply for consumer electronics. Memory manufacturers, after enduring periods of low profits, now hold greater pricing power. This is reflected in their recent strong financials, like Micron's 84.6% gross margin. Apple CEO Tim Cook initially described the memory price pressure as unprecedented in his 40-year career, later calling it a "once-in-a-century flood," before Apple announced price hikes across several product lines, causing a significant stock drop. Elon Musk echoed Cook's sentiment about the dramatic cost surge. The article concludes that the era of memory suppliers being at the mercy of Apple's pricing power has temporarily reversed, thanks to AI-driven demand. It notes Apple is reportedly seeking to diversify its supply chain, including exploring chips from China's CXMT.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Conversation with the Founder of 42 Macro: The Fed's 'Boiling the Frog Slowly' and the K-Shaped Economy

In a conversation with Anthony Pompliano, Darius Dale, founder of 42 Macro, discusses the Federal Reserve's monetary policy and the K-shaped U.S. economy. Dale characterizes new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh as a "dove in hawk's clothing," expecting the Fed to signal or enact policy tightening in the coming quarters to create room for later easing. He argues current economic signals, including high deficit spending, debt monetization, and credit growth, strongly indicate inflation is not on a credible path back to 2%, forcing the Fed to act. The discussion highlights the stark "K-shaped" economic reality. While top earners, buoyed by massive cash savings (up ~$8 trillion since pre-pandemic), continue robust spending, those at the bottom face severe financial strain, with delinquency rates on consumer loans reaching crisis-era highs. Dale attributes much of the current social and political anxiety to this divergence, driven by the "Cantillon effects" of monetary expansion, which disproportionately benefits asset owners. He emphasizes that in this environment of "financial repression," individuals must participate in asset markets to avoid being left behind. On equities, Dale notes a rotation from the "Magnificent Seven" tech giants into broader AI-exposed companies, while warning that the tech giants' massive capital expenditure cycles could eventually puncture over-optimistic cash flow projections. Dale concludes by stressing that the core desire across all economic strata is simply the dignity to provide for one's family, a goal currently undermined by systemic policies that act as a "wealth siphon" from the bottom to the top.

marsbit1h ago

Conversation with the Founder of 42 Macro: The Fed's 'Boiling the Frog Slowly' and the K-Shaped Economy

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片