Hackers use SpaceXAI, Starlink X accounts to pump SCATMAN: Token crashes 98%

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-13Last updated on 2026-07-13

Abstract

On July 13th, hackers compromised the verified X accounts of SpaceXAI and Starlink to fraudulently promote the SCATMAN memecoin. The tweets, one gaining over 72,000 views quickly, misled users into believing the token was legitimate, generating significant buying pressure. Prior to the campaign, the attacker had minted 10 trillion SCATMAN tokens. After the price briefly approached a $2 million market cap, the attacker dumped their holdings for 73.7 ETH (approximately $135,000), causing liquidity to vanish and the token's value to crash by 98%. This incident highlights how compromised high-profile accounts can exploit online trust to create exit liquidity for crypto scams.

Attackers are increasingly using trusted social media accounts to fraudulently sell tokens to users. This pattern resurfaced on the 13th of July, when hackers compromised verified SpaceXAI and Starlink X accounts to promote the SCATMAN memecoin.

These tweets garnered large amounts of attention, with one post receiving over 72k views in a matter of minutes.

Many people who viewed the tweets believed that the token had an increased level of legitimacy, thus creating additional buying pressure on the token.

Source: X

Meanwhile, the attacker had already minted 10 trillion SCATMAN before the campaign began. The wallets then dumped holdings for 73.7 ETH, worth roughly $135,000. The token briefly approached a $2 million market capitalization before liquidity disappeared, losing 98% of its value.

This incident again showed how compromised high-profile accounts can rapidly transform online trust into exit liquidity for coordinated crypto scams.

Liquidity failed to sustain the rally

Related Questions

QWhat cryptocurrency was fraudulently promoted by hackers using compromised SpaceXAI and Starlink X accounts?

AThe SCATMAN memecoin was fraudulently promoted by the hackers.

QHow much value did the SCATMAN token lose after the scam?

AThe SCATMAN token lost 98% of its value after the scam.

QWhat did the attackers do before starting the promotion campaign on social media?

ABefore the campaign, the attacker had already minted 10 trillion SCATMAN tokens.

QHow much money did the attacker make by selling the tokens during the scam?

AThe attacker made 73.7 ETH, worth roughly $135,000, by selling the tokens.

QAccording to the article, what does this incident demonstrate about compromised high-profile accounts?

AThe incident shows how compromised high-profile accounts can rapidly transform online trust into exit liquidity for coordinated crypto scams.

Related Reads

Robinhood Provides the Answer: Why Ethereum Becomes the Optimal Solution After Traditional Businesses Enter

The article argues that as real-world, cash-flow-focused businesses enter the blockchain space, they are increasingly choosing the Ethereum L1 + L2 architecture as the optimal infrastructure solution, in contrast to earlier crypto projects built primarily around token sales. It uses Robinhood as a prime example: after testing its stock tokenization product on Arbitrum One, Robinhood launched its own dedicated blockchain, "Robinhood Chain," which is built as an Ethereum L2 using Arbitrum's technology, relying on Ethereum for data availability (via blobs), using ETH as its native gas token, and employing a standard bridge to Ethereum. The author, Ryan Berckmans, distinguishes between two types of participants with different incentive structures: 1. **The "Old Crypto Economy":** Projects whose primary goal is to create and sell a token, with value derived from utility expectations, speculative "monetary premium," or distant cash-flow promises. Their technology stack choices are often flexible and driven by grants, copycat opportunities, or the need for a new token narrative. 2. **The Emerging "Real-World On-Chain Economy":** Traditional businesses using blockchain to improve existing services or create new cash-flow streams. Their goal is to maximize business profits, not token appreciation. For them, blockchain is infrastructure, and they prioritize low risk, security, user reach, operational control, liquidity, and interoperability. For these real-world enterprises, building a standalone L1 is costly, creating a new "security and liquidity island." Ethereum's L1+L2 model splits their core needs: the L1 provides a highly decentralized, neutral, and liquid global settlement layer, while L2s offer a market of customizable, high-performance, operator-controlled execution environments. An Ethereum L2 grants most benefits of an independent chain (high TPS, control, custom features) while inheriting Ethereum's security, seamless access to its ecosystem and assets, and native, low-trust bridging. The piece concludes that this shift in market participants profoundly benefits Ethereum and ETH. As businesses build on Ethereum (directly on L1, via their own L2 like Robinhood Chain, or on shared L2s like Base), they onboard users, embed ETH into products, and deepen its network effects and monetary premium. The choice is driven not by ideological belief but by rational commercial judgment, making Ethereum L1+L2 the current default optimal solution.

Foresight News3m ago

Robinhood Provides the Answer: Why Ethereum Becomes the Optimal Solution After Traditional Businesses Enter

Foresight News3m ago

8000 BTC Hard to Sustain Stock Price, Can Reverse Stock Split Save American Bitcoin?

American Bitcoin Corp., a company tied to Eric Trump, faces a paradox: its Bitcoin holdings have grown to 8,000 BTC, yet its stock price remains under severe pressure. To maintain its Nasdaq listing, the company executed a 1-for-15 reverse stock split, which raises the per-share price but does not change overall market valuation. The company's strategy combines mining operations—producing BTC at a reported cost of $36,200—with treasury accumulation. While this allows for below-market asset acquisition, fundamental challenges persist. Q1 2026 results showed a net loss of $81.8 million and significant digital asset impairment losses of $117.2 million, despite mining revenue. The reverse split carries risks: it may not attract new investors, could be viewed negatively by the market, and might reduce liquidity. Furthermore, the company's unchanged authorized share capital leaves room for future equity issuance, creating dilution concerns for current shareholders. The core question for investors is whether owning the stock offers superior value compared to holding Bitcoin directly. The company's test will be proving its mining-based, low-cost accumulation model can sustainably grow per-share Bitcoin holdings without excessive dilution. Its performance is a case study for the crypto treasury sector, where asset growth alone may not support valuation if market confidence falters.

Foresight News50m ago

8000 BTC Hard to Sustain Stock Price, Can Reverse Stock Split Save American Bitcoin?

Foresight News50m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片