Stock Soars 1200% on First Day, 80s Sales Engineer's Reversal: From Selling FRP to a Fortune of 29 Billion

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-25Last updated on 2026-06-25

Abstract

On its first day of listing, Zhenbao Technology (stock code "N Zhenbao") surged by 1207%, marking itself as the second "ten-bagger" new stock of the year on the STAR Market. The closing price of 585 yuan propelled it into the top 20 of the A-share market by stock price. Dubbed the "first share of semiconductor consumables," the company is backed by a comprehensive shareholder list including National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund Phase II, SMIC, BOE, and YMTC. Zhenbao's business model focuses on supplying critical consumable components like silicon rings and quartz parts to semiconductor fabs. Unlike expensive core equipment with low repurchase rates, these consumables require frequent replacement as long as production lines are running, generating stable recurring revenue—a key reason for its high market valuation. Founder Wang Bing, an 80s-born former sales engineer, built the company by identifying a supply chain vulnerability: foreign monopolies on high-purity materials led to high costs and unstable deliveries for domestic fabs. Zhenbao's strategy emphasized reliability and speed over absolute top-tier performance, offering products at about 50% of the price with 80% of the performance but 100% on delivery and responsiveness. To achieve this, the company vertically integrated its operations across "raw materials + components + surface treatment," ensuring supply chain control and cost reduction. Its clientele now spans major domestic fabs like BOE and Huaho...

Zhenbao Technology ignited the entire STAR Market with a capital frenzy on its first trading day, soaring 1207% at debut, with single-application profits exceeding 270,000 yuan. Becoming the second '10-bagger' new stock of the year, its closing price of 585 yuan also secured a place in the top 20 of the A-share market's stock price rankings. Supported by the entire semiconductor industry chain as the 'first stock in semiconductor consumables', this company tells a 'band-aid' story more compelling than selling equipment through its integrated closed-loop of 'raw materials + components + surface treatment'—as long as wafer fabs are running, revenue keeps flowing in.

01

Not a "Scalpel," but a "Band-Aid"

The STAR Market has been ignited by a new stock in the past two days.

The newly listed semiconductor equipment component manufacturer—Zhenbao Technology (the new stock "N Zhenbao")—saw its share price skyrocket 1207% after opening, triggering a temporary trading halt. Based on one lot of 500 shares for the STAR Market, the maximum profit per lot from Zhenbao Technology exceeded 270,000 yuan.

In fact, during the issuance stage, Zhenbao Technology already showed signs of 'overheating'—the offline subscription multiple reached as high as 4363 times, making it one of the most crowded IPOs on the STAR Market in recent years. Its shareholder list reads like a 'family portrait' of the semiconductor industry chain: National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund Phase II, SMIC, BOE, Yangtze Memory, Huahong Group... from upstream to downstream, from capital to industry, almost all are present.

This means one thing: it is a target almost 'collectively supported' by the entire industry chain. But we have a question—what exactly has it done to warrant such pricing and expectations?

To explain with a simple analogy, there are essentially two types of businesses in the semiconductor industry. One is 'selling scalpels.' For example, etching machines, thin-film deposition equipment—these core equipment cost hundreds of millions each and can be used by wafer fabs for years, resulting in extremely low repurchase rates.

The other is 'selling band-aids.' Zhenbao Technology is exactly in this category—key consumable parts inside the equipment: silicon rings, quartz components, silicon carbide rings, etc. These components are constantly exposed to high-temperature plasma environments and typically have a lifespan of only a few months. In other words, as long as wafer fabs are still operational, these consumables will be continuously consumed, forming stable, predictable cash flow.

Image | Source: Company Official Website

Selling scalpels means waiting for hospitals to buy new ones; but selling band-aids means revenue every day as long as there is consumption.

This is precisely why the capital market is willing to grant it a higher premium: it's not about whether you have orders, but whether the orders are continuous.

If the story stopped here, it would at most be a good business, far from the current market frenzy. The key question is, how did Zhenbao Technology break into this market?

Unlike most hard-tech companies, Zhenbao Technology's starting point was not in the lab, but on the front lines of the market. Founder Wang Bing, born in the 1980s, started his career as a sales engineer at Shanghai Yaohua FRP Co., Ltd. after graduation, later entering the semiconductor equipment and materials field, also working in sales for many years. Based on the post-issuance total share capital of approximately 155 million shares, Wang Bing's direct shareholding is diluted to about 33%. Calculated at the latest market capitalization, his personal wealth is approximately 28.7 billion yuan.

Wang Bing noticed early on the structural challenges faced by domestic wafer fabs during rapid expansion: overseas manufacturers monopolized the technology for preparing high-purity silicon, quartz, and other materials. Domestic wafer fabs not only faced high equipment maintenance costs but also extremely unstable supply lead times.

In the past, this issue was tolerable. However, with increasing uncertainty in the geopolitical environment, supply chain security has transformed from a cost issue into a survival issue.

Therefore, Zhenbao Technology offered a very clever and pragmatic solution: performance reaches 80%, price reaches 50%, but delivery speed and responsiveness reach 100%.

To achieve this, Wang Bing chose the hardest path. Traditional component manufacturers often only engage in 'OEM + material sales,' but Zhenbao Technology has established a full-chain closed loop encompassing 'raw materials + components + surface treatment.' The company independently developed and mass-produced key raw materials such as large-diameter monocrystalline silicon rods, polycrystalline silicon rods, CVD high-purity silicon carbide ultra-thick materials, and ceramic granulated powders. This not only ensures supply chain stability but also significantly reduces production costs.

For those wafer fab customers, this choice might not be perfect, but it is usable, controllable, and sustainable.

Thus, a subtle yet crucial relationship began to form—upstream suppliers are no longer just technology providers but also risk-sharing partners; downstream wafer fabs no longer pursue a single optimal solution but accept a combination that is 'sub-optimal yet secure.'

Because of this, Zhenbao Technology's customer list includes not only domestic leading wafer fabs such as BOE, Nexchip, CR Micro, and Silergy Integration; it has also entered the supply systems of international manufacturers like SK Hynix (Dalian), GlobalFoundries, United Microelectronics Corporation, and Texas Instruments.

This indicates that its competitiveness is not merely based on import substitution but also possesses a certain degree of global comparability.

According to Frost & Sullivan data, in 2024, among local enterprises directly supplying semiconductor equipment components to wafer fabs, Zhenbao Technology ranked first in the silicon component market with a revenue market share of 4.5%, and first in the quartz component market with a revenue market share of 8.8%.

02

Behind the 1.6 Billion Fundraising

If the 1200% surge tells a story of 'imagination,' then the 1.6 billion fundraising corresponds to a more realistic balance sheet.

For this IPO, Zhenbao Technology raised a net amount of 1.605 billion yuan, primarily for investment in capacity expansion. This in itself is not a problem. However, once this money is converted into production capacity, it quickly becomes an unavoidable cost: depreciation.

According to the prospectus estimates, after the fundraising projects reach full capacity, the annual peak of newly added depreciation and amortization expenses will be 72.7718 million yuan. This is not a flexible cost but a rigid expense. Compared to the company's 2025 net profit of 226 million yuan, this expense would directly consume about one-third of the profit. In other words, as long as capacity utilization does not increase, the income statement will be the first to 'change face.' This is an unavoidable turning point for all heavy-asset manufacturing enterprises.

Looking at the company's recent growth performance, such pressure once seemed manageable. From 2022 to 2025, Zhenbao Technology's revenues were 386 million, 506 million, 635 million, and 846 million yuan respectively, with net profits attributable to the parent company being 81.62 million, 108 million, 152 million, and 226 million yuan respectively, showing a trend of continuous and accelerating growth.

In the first half of this year, the company expects to achieve revenue of 472 million to 492 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of approximately 29% to 34%, and net profit attributable to the parent company of 105 million to 115 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of approximately 23% to 35%. On the surface, such growth rates seem sufficient to offset the profit erosion caused by new depreciation. However, the question is whether this growth itself is built upon a sustainable demand cycle.

Image | Source: Company Prospectus

The company's answer is optimistic: it expects revenue by 2028 to grow by 144.14% compared to 2024. This assumption implies a premise—downstream wafer fabs will continue to maintain high-intensity expansion.

However, judging by industry patterns, semiconductors are a typical strong-cycle industry. Especially for the component segment where Zhenbao Technology operates, although it possesses 'consumable attributes,' its essence is still tied to equipment utilization rates and new production lines. Once memory or logic chips enter a destocking cycle and utilization rates drop, consumable demand will also contract.

A more immediate pressure comes from external competition. Japanese manufacturers still hold technological advantages in the high-end component field. If they counterattack through price reductions or by bundling with equipment manufacturers, the room for domestic manufacturers' 'cost-performance strategy' will be significantly compressed. At that point, the capacity that has been built but cannot operate at full load will no longer be a moat, but a burden.

Aside from the uncertainty on the capacity side, the fund occupation issue evident in the financial statements is equally worthy of vigilance. In mid-2025, the company's accounts receivable as a percentage of revenue once reached as high as 70.83%, indicating a clear decline in turnover efficiency. Behind this indicator lies a typical industry chain position—although the company has secured leading customers, its bargaining power is limited, necessitating more lenient payment terms to secure orders. For investors, this means profits may not smoothly convert into cash flow. Once downstream customers delay payments or industry sentiment declines, pressure on the capital chain will amplify rapidly.

The concentration of the customer structure further amplifies this uncertainty. The sales proportion of the top five customers has long exceeded 70%, seemingly indicating 'binding with leaders.' However, from a risk perspective, it is closer to single-point reliance. This structure poses few problems during industry upswings but tends to magnify volatility during downturns.

A more subtle risk stems from the substance of its 'science and technology innovation attributes.' During the critical application period, the company rapidly expanded its R&D personnel from 38 to 113, just crossing the STAR Market's 10% threshold. However, 34 people were subsequently transferred out in the first half of 2025. Such drastic fluctuations in personnel structure inevitably raise market doubts about the authenticity and sustainability of its R&D investments.

Furthermore, the company's early R&D management was relatively crude, with abnormal fluctuations in work-hour records and energy consumption statistics. For example, R&D energy consumption surged 1135% year-on-year in 2024. While such details may not directly impact current performance, in an industry like semiconductors that demands extremely high process stability, they affect the market's judgment of its long-term technological capabilities.

In summary, the core contradiction for Zhenbao Technology is already very clear: on one side is the valuation premium brought by the certainty of the 'consumable logic,' on the other is the performance volatility risk brought by heavy-asset expansion.

For the secondary market, a high valuation can be paid in the short term for the 'band-aid' story. However, mid-to-long-term pricing will ultimately return to two variables—whether capacity utilization can remain high and whether cash flow can keep up with the income statement. If deviations occur in these two points, then this 72 million yuan depreciation may not merely be an erosion of profit, but the starting point for valuation compression.

This article is from the WeChat public account "Phoenix Network Technology," author: Lu Chunfeng, editor: Dong Yuqing

Related Questions

QWhat is the core business model of Zhinbao Technology, and why is it described as more attractive than selling equipment in the semiconductor industry?

AZhinbao Technology's core business model focuses on manufacturing and selling semiconductor equipment consumables, such as silicon rings, quartz parts, and silicon carbide rings. These are key components inside semiconductor manufacturing equipment that have a short lifespan due to constant exposure to high-temperature plasma environments. This model is described as more attractive than selling major equipment (like etchers) because it generates stable, recurring revenue. As long as a wafer fab is operating, these consumables are continuously consumed, providing a predictable cash flow, unlike major equipment which has a low repurchase rate.

QHow did Wang Bing, the founder of Zhinbao Technology, initially enter the semiconductor field and what key insight led to the company's founding strategy?

AWang Bing, an 80s-born founder, initially worked as a sales engineer at Shanghai Yaohua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. after graduation and later spent many years in sales within the semiconductor equipment and materials industry. His key insight was recognizing the structural challenges faced by domestic wafer fabs during rapid expansion: high reliance on foreign suppliers for key materials and unstable supply cycles. This led to Zhinbao's founding strategy of offering a practical solution—achieving 80% of the performance, 50% of the price, but 100% in delivery speed and responsiveness—to address supply chain security concerns.

QWhat are the major risks associated with Zhinbao Technology's post-IPO expansion plans, as indicated by its use of raised funds?

AThe major risks associated with Zhinbao Technology's post-IPO expansion plans are primarily tied to its heavy asset investment. The company raised approximately 1.605 billion yuan for capacity expansion. The resulting new assets will lead to significant annual depreciation and amortization expenses (peak of 72.7718 million yuan). If capacity utilization does not reach high levels, these fixed costs could erode a substantial portion of profits (potentially one-third based on 2025 net profit). This creates earnings volatility risk, especially if downstream wafer fab expansion slows or enters a cyclical downturn.

QWhat financial concern is highlighted by Zhinbao Technology's accounts receivable ratio, and what does it imply about the company's position in the supply chain?

AThe article highlights a concerningly high accounts receivable to revenue ratio of 70.83% as of mid-2025. This implies that a large portion of the company's sales are tied up in unpaid customer invoices. It reflects a weaker bargaining power within the supply chain, suggesting Zhinbao may need to offer extended payment terms to secure orders from its major wafer fab clients. This situation poses a cash flow risk, as profits are not readily convertible to cash, and any delays in customer payments or an industry downturn could strain the company's financial liquidity.

QWhat questions does the article raise regarding Zhinbao Technology's 'scientific and technological innovation attributes,' particularly related to its R&D personnel and practices?

AThe article raises questions about the authenticity and sustainability of Zhinbao Technology's R&D efforts. Concerns include: 1) A sharp fluctuation in R&D headcount—rapidly increasing from 38 to 113 personnel to meet the STAR Market's 10% threshold during the application period, followed by a reduction of 34 people shortly after. 2) Early-stage R&D management described as 'rough,' with abnormal fluctuations in man-hour records and energy consumption statistics (e.g., a 1135% year-on-year surge in R&D energy consumption in 2024). These issues cast doubt on the consistency and depth of the company's technological capabilities.

Related Reads

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

Former SpaceX engineer Lex Li applies "First Principles Thinking" to financial infrastructure with Plan Execution Lab, recently raising angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The team argues that the core function of finance is capital allocation, and the critical gap is not in trading but in execution, which remains highly manual and fragmented. While assets, liquidity, and settlement have migrated on-chain, execution workflows (monitoring, risk management, liquidity coordination) are still human-native. In an era of accelerating AI agents, strategy decay is rapid, shifting the competitive edge from having the best strategy to having the most robust execution network. Plan Execution Lab introduces two core components: 1. **PlanX**: A Financial Execution Protocol designed as infrastructure for the migration from CEX to DEX, providing on-chain execution capabilities, liquidity access, risk management, and capital orchestration. 2. **Xgent**: An Autonomous Financial Runtime. Users define investment intents, risk preferences, and constraints; Xgent automatically constructs an execution graph, verifies it, and handles ongoing execution and optimization—streamlining the process from Intent to Autonomous Execution. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—a shared operating environment and execution network built collectively by participants like execution nodes, liquidity providers, and autonomous agents. The future of finance, they contend, belongs not to isolated algorithms but to open, collaborative execution networks.

marsbit14m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

marsbit14m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

Plan Execution Lab, a financial infrastructure project founded by former SpaceX engineer Lex Li, has raised angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The startup is applying "first principles thinking" from Li's SpaceX experience to rethink financial market execution. Their analysis posits that while assets, liquidity, and settlement have moved on-chain, the execution layer remains fundamentally human-dependent and fragmented. In the era of AI Agents, strategy advantages decay rapidly, shifting the competitive edge from isolated algorithms to robust **execution networks**. Plan Execution Lab's solution is a two-part system: **PlanX**, a Financial Execution Protocol designed to facilitate the migration from centralized exchanges (CEX) to on-chain markets by providing core on-chain execution capabilities; and **Xgent**, an Autonomous Financial Runtime. Xgent allows users to define investment goals and constraints, then autonomously constructs and manages the execution logic—moving from **Intent to Execution Graph to Verification to Autonomous Execution**. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—an operating environment not for humans, but for agents and execution nodes. The future financial system, they argue, will be a collaborative network built by diverse participants contributing execution capabilities, not secret strategies. The core competition will shift to who builds the most powerful and adaptive execution network.

链捕手14m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

链捕手14m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

With the advancement of LLM Code Agents, the research focus is shifting towards long-horizon, real-world tasks, moving beyond simple bug fixes to full repository generation. To address this, researchers from Renmin University of China introduced the DeNovoSWE dataset. This dataset focuses on long-term software engineering tasks, specifically the "document-to-repository" challenge—generating an entire, executable code repository from a task description. The DeNovoSWE construction method employs a Divide & Conquer approach. It breaks down target repositories into core capabilities and uses a multi-agent Draft-Critic-Repair workflow to automatically generate high-quality, evaluation-aligned task documents. The dataset also implements difficulty-aware filtering to balance quality and diversity. The result is a high-quality, anti-leakage dataset of 4,818 instances. Experiments show that models trained on DeNovoSWE achieve significant improvements in long-horizon repository generation. For instance, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct's performance on the BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark increased from 5.8% to 47.2%, and on NL2RepoBench from 4.3% to 23.0%. Similar gains were observed with stronger backbones, demonstrating that dedicated long-horizon training data is crucial for advancing Code Agents from maintainers to architects capable of planning and building complete software projects from scratch.

marsbit29m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

marsbit29m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

In an episode of Galaxy Brains, Binance founder CZ praised Hyperliquid as "awesome" but clarified that while its product is strong, Binance cannot compete in its specific niche due to Hyperliquid's no-KYC, decentralized model. CZ noted he would not personally operate such a model, highlighting the inherent legal and compliance risks tied to its access advantage. The discussion underscores a core market structure conflict: on-chain perp platforms like Hyperliquid thrive on open, low-barrier access, which regulated exchanges like Binance cannot replicate without abandoning their global compliance posture. However, this very advantage makes Hyperliquid a clear target for regulatory scrutiny. The UK FCA has already issued a warning against Hyperliquid for potentially offering unauthorized services to UK users, framing it as a financial services provider rather than neutral infrastructure. Historical cases like the CFTC's action against bZeroX and Ooki DAO further illustrate that regulators may pursue decentralized structures if they facilitate leveraged trading for retail users without proper controls. Meanwhile, regulated venues like Cboe are developing US-compliant "continuous futures" that mimic perpetual exposure, narrowing the product gap. Hyperliquid's long-term edge may increasingly hinge on its access model—the very feature most exposed to regulatory pressure. The key question is whether its "access premium" can withstand escalating legal challenges as on-chain perps gain mainstream attention.

marsbit47m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

marsbit47m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片