疫情之下,元宇宙婚礼考虑一下?

火星财经Published on 2022-03-25Last updated on 2022-03-25

Abstract

以虚拟形象出现在婚礼仪式上更像是一种游戏体验

突如其来的疫情打乱了人们正常的生活节奏。提前准备好的工作计划、外出游玩甚至是结婚计划都在反复的疫情中被推迟或取消。对于有结婚计划的新人来说,婚纱照不能如约拍摄、婚宴不能如期举行实属遗憾。现在有了一个新鲜的选择,元宇宙婚礼考虑一下?
元宇宙婚礼成为新的选择
疫情之后,工作生活重心转移到线上,元宇宙概念平台的建设也加快了我发展脚步,一些公司如 Com2uS 已经将办公场地迁移到了元宇宙中,公司员工都在元宇宙中完成办公和交互。不少明星也将线下集会搬到线上,例如贾斯汀·比伯就在虚拟演艺平台 WAVE 上举办了个人第一场虚拟演唱会,现实中的场景被无缝衔接的过渡到元宇宙中。
最近,一对印度夫妇就邀请了 2000 人来参加他们的元宇宙婚礼派对。宾客们可以通过手机、平板电脑或笔记本电脑参加婚礼。
新郎是区块链和加密货币的爱好者,他和 TardiVerse 合作并打造了一个灵感源自霍格沃茨的城堡般的数字空间,因为夫妻二人都是哈利波特的粉丝。
这场元宇宙婚礼涉及派对设计、开发和举办,一共耗资15万印度卢比(约合人民币1.3万元)。婚礼时长在一小时左右,他们以自己在元宇宙中的虚拟形象为代表来出席婚礼。宾客们可以通过在电脑前操作来参观城堡,并定制自己的头像和服饰。

这场婚礼最有趣的亮点是新郎定制了一个与已过世岳父相似的 3D 角色,让他也能来见证这对新人的婚礼。
新郎说:“我的岳父去年四月去世了。所以我定制了一个与岳父相似的 3D 角色,他会祝福我和我的未婚妻。这是只有在元宇宙中才能实现的。”

元宇宙婚礼的合法性
目前,Decentraland的设施和生态发展都比较完善,这也让它成为了承载元宇宙婚礼的最佳选择。
一对美国夫妇就于上个月在 Decentraland 上举行了婚礼,他们的见证人以及美国亚利桑那最高法院法官 Clint Bolick 和 2000 名虚拟观众出席了婚礼。
新娘和新郎聘还请了 Rose Law Group 将婚姻合法化。 Rose Law Group 是一家提供全方位服务的房地产和商业律师事务所。该事务所通过纳入“虚拟婚前协议”开发了一个“元婚姻框架”,确定了这对夫妇的虚拟身份和数字资产记录在区块链上。
同时,“元婚姻许可证” 将区块链上这对夫妇的虚拟身份和结婚地点识别、记录和标记为 NFT。
该法律小组认为“目前元宇宙没有婚姻的法律框架,所以它是否具有法律约束力更多的是合约问题。”
来自巴西的一对新人同样也在 Decentraland 中举办了婚礼,婚礼通过智能合约邀请了亲友及其他机构来宾,每位宾客均可收到 NFT 作为婚礼纪念品。
他们这场婚礼所在 Decentraland 的地块价值 200 万美元,不过婚礼中的场景及物品的布置都是合作方赠送的。这对新人在接受采访时表示:“我们的婚礼是合作举行的,很多名人和机构都参与了这场活动,所以我们几乎没有花钱。”

不过,尽管 Rose Law Group 尽可能的将元宇宙婚姻合法化,但对于大部分法律专家来说,这种形式仍不具备法律效益,毕竟以虚拟形象出现在婚礼仪式上更像是一种游戏体验。

Related Reads

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warns that companies relying solely on a single AI model could jeopardize their survival. He argues that over-dependence leads to "vendor lock-in," where businesses risk ceding control over their core data, memory, contextual history, and AI usage patterns. This dependence essentially outsources a company's critical thinking and operational know-how to an external provider. The deeper a company integrates with one AI system—feeding it prompts, internal data, and workflows—the more it reveals its unique business methods and competitive edge. This accumulated knowledge could become accessible to the AI supplier. Furthermore, switching providers becomes extremely costly and complex, as companies would need to rebuild their entire AI-augmented workflow, memory, and tool integrations from scratch. Nadella's solution is "decoupling." Companies should separate their proprietary data, memory, and control layer (or "harness") from the underlying AI models. By retaining metadata from every AI interaction, businesses can preserve their operational "brain" or institutional knowledge. This allows them to flexibly use different AI models (e.g., from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft) for specific tasks without losing their accumulated expertise. The core idea: companies can rent the smartest models available, but they must keep their own "brain" and operational control firmly in-house.

marsbit36m ago

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's Latest Warning: Betting Entirely on a Single AI Model Hands Over a Company's Lifeblood

marsbit36m ago

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

A founder at an energy investment forum advises bitcoin miners not to purchase GPUs for AI themselves, but to instead focus on infrastructure like power and data center space. Mike Alfred of Alpine Fox stated that while AI infrastructure demand is a long-term, 20-30 year trend, it presents a key choice for miners. The first, riskier model involves owning and operating GPUs, which requires financing expensive hardware that quickly becomes obsolete. The second, more conservative model is akin to real estate: providing colocation services where clients bring their own servers, and the miner sells space, power, cooling, and water. Alfred noted this model is easier to finance. Most existing bitcoin mining sites are difficult and expensive to convert for AI, as AI data centers require far higher construction costs, redundant fiber connections, backup power, complex cooling, and near 100% uptime. A hybrid model, where mining acts as a flexible load to use excess power during AI data center construction or from generation facilities, was discussed. However, participants concluded this is only viable with very cheap power; otherwise, developers are better off focusing solely on AI. Miners are increasingly being evaluated for their available power capacity and project portfolios rather than just bitcoin output. Panelists also warned of risks in the AI sector, predicting at least one major default or contract breach among AI tenants, lenders, or landlords before bitcoin's next halving in 2028.

cryptonews.ru46m ago

Miners Advised Not to Buy GPUs for AI and to Focus on Infrastructure

cryptonews.ru46m ago

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

"Millisecond 'Paid Queue-Jumping': How Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Became a Multi-Million Dollar Annual Business" In traditional finance, high-frequency trading firms spend millions on infrastructure for millisecond advantages. Hyperliquid has translated this race onto the blockchain with its "Priority Fee" system, creating an open economic game for speed. This system auctions two types of priority: **Gossip Priority** for faster data feeds (via a Dutch auction every 3 minutes), and **Order Priority** for front-of-queue trade execution (users bid a fee for lower latency). This converts a hardware race into a transparent, market-priced mechanism. Since launch, this feature has generated over $5M in protocol revenue. Projected annualized buybacks from this income exceed $30M, accounting for ~7% of total protocol revenue. The demand stems from large traders and market makers on Hyperliquid, for whom milliseconds can mean the difference between profit/loss or avoiding liquidation. Market makers pay these fees as "protection" to ensure their orders execute first, which in turn improves liquidity for all users. Crucially, Hyperliquid internalizes Maximum Extractable Value (MEV) that typically leaks to external validators or searchers, creating a new revenue stream beyond trading fees. The mechanism also strengthens HYPE's tokenomics. While 97% of trading fees fund secondary market buybacks (via the Assistance Fund), Priority Fees are **directly burned**, adding a second deflationary engine. Furthermore, fees for order priority are deducted from users' undelegated HYPE balances, encouraging large traders to hold and lock up tokens, reducing circulating supply. However, a key challenge remains: balancing the speed needs of institutional players with fair market access for retail users, as those who cannot pay high fees may suffer worse slippage during volatility. In summary, Hyperliquid's Priority Fee is a novel model that monetizes latency, captures MEV for the protocol, and enhances its native token's value through burning and lock-ups.

marsbit51m ago

Millisecond 'Pay-to-Cut': How Did Hyperliquid's Priority Fee Turn into a Multi-Million Dollar Business?

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片