Visa Teases Ethereum Collab, Aims to ‘Actively Contribute’ to Crypto Development

DecryptPublished on 2022-12-20Last updated on 2022-12-20

Abstract

The payment company released a paper Monday exploring the potential for crypto auto-payments.

Global payments giant Visa signaled its stronger, sustained interest in crypto on Monday, releasing a paper outlining how the firm could one day collaborate with the Ethereum network on automatic payments.

The paper, sparked by an internal company hackathon held earlier this year, details how Ethereum users could—with support from Visa—schedule auto-payments sent from self-custodial crypto wallets. Such capability is not yet possible on the Ethereum mainnet, but would be enabled by a popular Ethereum proposal called “Account Abstraction,” which would allow Ethereum user accounts to function like smart contracts and feature pre-scheduled execution functions.

Though crypto auto-payments would not necessarily have a dramatic impact on the banking and payments landscape, it’s a further sign that Visa is planning on becoming an active player in crypto, a sector it sees as potentially critical to the long-term future of payments.

“We want to have an opportunity to actively contribute to technical developments happening in the crypto ecosystem,” Catherine Gu, Visa’s Head of CBDC and Protocols, told Decrypt. “The best way to do that is learning by doing—actually getting deeper into Web3 infrastructures and blockchain protocols, areas I think are going to be really important for payments.”

Gu’s group, first organized to look into the potential of digital currencies backed by world governments, is now actively investigating what other blockchain technologies are poised to reshape the world of payments—and how soon their adoption could be implemented.

That day doesn’t seem, in Gu’s opinion, to be particularly close.

“This technology is very nascent right now, but there could be something there down the road,” Gu said. “A lot of research needs to be done around fundamental aspects important for payments, like security and scalability.”

An enduring, elusive goal for blockchain networks like Ethereum has long been scalability: the ability to maintain network security while allowing for cheap and instant transactions on a mass scale. Many anticipated updates to the Ethereum network are focused on tackling this problem. Proto-danksharding, for example, is an early version of a system that could one day radically reduce the amount of data needed to be securely analyzed to process huge swathes of Ethereum transactions. It is expected to launch some time later next year.

“From a payments standpoint, most [blockchain networks] are not yet scalable enough to process transactions at a really high speed in a secure and trusted way,” Gu said.

Until networks like Ethereum can extensively scale, it’s unlikely they will be meaningfully integrated by major firms like Visa. But the payments company, which has been in regular communication with Ethereum’s core developers, is optimistic that such technological horizons are within reach.

That optimism offers a marked departure from the grimness of current mainstream sentiment on crypto, dominated in the last month by the continually unfolding demise of crypto exchange FTX and its disgraced founder, Sam Bankman-Fried.

“It's very important to figure out what's the signal and what's the noise,” Gu said. “We're taking a much longer-term perspective on this technology. It may have real utility, and that’s why we’re here: to invest more, to do research.”

In October, the firm filed trademark applications indicating it was mulling a crypto wallet and a metaverse product. A month later, Visa pulled the plug on a partnership with FTX that allowed users of the crypto exchange to obtain Visa-branded debit cards.

That same month, rival payments firm Mastercard teamed with crypto trading platform Paxos to launch crypto trading for banks.

Related Reads

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

"Investors are pouring billions into Chinese AI startups with no profits, betting on the future of the industry. A state-backed fund is reportedly in talks to lead DeepSeek's funding at a $45B valuation, just weeks after it was valued at $10B. Along with companies like Zhipu AI, MiniMax, and Kimi (backed by Meituan and Alibaba), their combined valuation exceeds $140B. This isn't a typical venture capital play. Investors are paying for 'future definition rights'—a chance to set the standards for the next tech era. Morgan Stanley notes a 6-12 month window for this scarcity premium before more AI companies go public. Despite massive losses, these companies show strong growth. Zhipu AI's API revenue grew 60x, Kimi's annual recurring revenue doubled to $200M in a month, and MiniMax turned its gross margin positive, with over 70% of revenue from overseas. Their valuations vastly exceed profitable firms like iFlytek. Crucially, technical progress underpins this growth. DeepSeek's latest model boasts costs just 1% of a leading competitor's, while Zhipu AI has raised API prices due to high demand. However, gaps with top global models remain. Tech giants like Tencent and Alibaba, investing heavily while describing their own AI efforts as 'leaky boats,' are also investing in these startups as a hedge. Key risks loom: the closing scarcity window, computing power bottlenecks limiting growth, and the sustainability of DeepSeek's cost-advantage model. With state capital now a major player, the success of these companies has become a strategic national concern. The next year will test if their soaring valuations can be justified by future profits."

marsbit50m ago

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

marsbit50m ago

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

On May 22, the U.S. SEC postponed the release of a key "innovation exemption" draft that would have permitted crypto-native platforms to issue and trade tokenized U.S. stocks on decentralized venues without full traditional exchange compliance. This would have legalized a "third-party token" model used overseas, where platforms issue tokens tracking stock prices without the underlying company's involvement, raising unresolved questions about shareholder rights, dividends, and sanctions enforcement. Meanwhile, the SEC had already approved a different, compliant path for tokenization led by Nasdaq and NYSE. Their model integrates tokenized stocks into existing settlement systems (like DTCC), preserving all shareholder rights. This creates a fundamental conflict: crypto platforms seek a permissionless, 24/7 on-chain parallel market, while traditional exchanges advocate for an upgraded, regulated version of the current system. Intense lobbying from traditional exchange groups like the World Federation of Exchanges argued the exemption would create an unfair regulatory advantage and dilute investor protection. Even some compliant crypto firms favored delay. Internally, SEC commissioners were divided on the scope and pace of the exemption. The delay highlights a critical policy crossroads. With significant trading volume already occurring overseas, the SEC's decision will determine whether the U.S. embraces a dual-track system for tokenized equities or sidelines itself from an emerging global infrastructure. The core unresolved question remains the legal status and rights of holders of third-party tokenized stocks. The SEC paused because the draft framework risked creating a major new asset class with profound, unanswered legal implications.

marsbit58m ago

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

marsbit58m ago

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

The article discusses concerns about a potential "super IPO wave" hitting the U.S. stock market, with major companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic preparing to go public. While these large IPOs could collectively raise hundreds of billions, raising fears of a market "blood drain," analysis suggests the impact may be limited. Key points include: * Historical data shows IPO waves often coincide with strong market returns, as they typically occur during periods of high investor demand. * Model estimates suggest even the largest IPOs might only cause a market dip of around 1%. They are more likely to trigger a routine market pullback rather than end a bull market. * The current demand side remains supportive due to high household cash balances, strong corporate earnings growth, continued stock fund inflows, and robust share buyback announcements. * The main risk lies in concentrated investor positions, particularly in large-cap tech stocks, which are at elevated levels. A shift in funds towards new issuances could pressure these crowded sectors. * Recent fund flows show strength concentrated in U.S. and tech stocks, while other regions like Europe and Japan are experiencing outflows. The conclusion is that the IPO wave itself is unlikely to crash the market unless it coincides with a weakening in underlying demand factors like earnings or fund inflows into U.S. equities. The focus should be on whether demand can continue to absorb the new supply.

marsbit1h ago

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

Vitalik Buterin recently published an extensive article addressing core concerns about Ethereum's future direction and the role of the Ethereum Foundation (EF). He clarifies that the EF is not his personal domain nor the central authority of Ethereum; it operates as just one node within the broader ecosystem. The board makes collective decisions, with significant operational work led by Aya Miyaguchi, allowing Vitalik to focus on technical matters. The article critiques the perception that the EF should act like a conventional, fast-moving tech company. Buterin warns that merely chasing higher TPS, lower latency, or better marketing—like other chains—risks diluting Ethereum's foundational values. He draws a parallel to Google's evolution away from its "Don't be evil" ethos. Instead, the EF's renewed mandate is to focus on preserving and strengthening Ethereum's core principles, summarized as CROPS: **C**ensorship-resistance, **R**esistance to capture, **O**pen source, **P**rivacy, and **S**ecurity. The foundation will concentrate its limited resources (holding only ~0.16% of ETH) on these long-term, non-commercializable fundamentals, while ecosystem growth, applications, and market-facing activities should be driven by external teams and capital. Buterin outlines key technical priorities aligned with this vision: 1) Advancing formal verification to mathematically prove the absence of bugs; 2) Enhancing consensus security to maintain operation without reliance on social coordination during outages; and 3) Reducing dependency on intermediaries (like RPCs) to strengthen user sovereignty and privacy. He acknowledges ETH as Ethereum's most valuable asset, crucial for security, but stresses that promoting its value is a task for the wider ecosystem, not the EF. Ultimately, Buterin's message is a strategic refocus: the EF will become a smaller, more focused entity guarding Ethereum's essential, harder-to-achieve properties, ensuring it remains distinct not just in performance but in its commitment to decentralization, resistance, and security.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片