90% of Rare Earth Refining is in China's Hands, American Humanoid Robot Mass Production Faces a Hardware Bottleneck

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-16Last updated on 2026-03-16

Abstract

The article highlights a critical vulnerability in the U.S. ambition to mass-produce humanoid robots like Optimus: China’s dominance over the hardware supply chain, particularly rare earth elements (REEs). China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85–90% of refining capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet production—key components in actuators, motors, and sensors essential for robotic joints and drivetrains. Major U.S. robotics firms rely heavily on Chinese and Japanese suppliers for critical components such as harmonic reducers, servo systems, and precision gears, while retaining only the AI "brain" domestically. In a scenario with 1 billion humanoid robots by 2050, Morgan Stanley estimates massive demand for neodymium, dysprosium, and terbium—consuming significant portions of global reserves. The author urges the U.S. to invest in rebuilding its rare earth supply chain—from mining and refining to magnet production—and lists key firms involved in magnet metals, structural metallurgy, and semiconductors. Without secure, cost-competitive access to these materials, U.S. robotics growth faces a structural risk, with China holding a potential "shut-off switch" over hardware production.

Author: Serenity

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: All the discussions about the robot revolution focus on AI and software, but this tweet points out a more fundamental structural risk: China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85-90% of refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet manufacturing. The joints and actuators of humanoid robots like Optimus all rely on Chinese or Japanese suppliers; what the US retains is just the "brain." The author uses specific material lists and Morgan Stanley's demand forecasts to quantify this bottleneck, projecting its impact on rare earth reserves in the era of 1 billion humanoid robots.

Full Text Below:

The United States is losing the robot and humanoid robot race with China.

Software and AI are only half the battle.

China holds a kill switch over the US robotics hardware supply chain because: The US cannot manufacture the materials needed for humanoid robots at scale and at a reasonable cost.

If China presses this "kill switch," the entire US robotics build-out will slow down—because China has dominant control over the "body" (actuators, reducers, metallurgy) and the raw materials required to manufacture humanoid robots.

Consequently, US robotics companies have signed contracts with Chinese manufacturers to procure all humanoid robot components, in order to assemble products like Optimus at a low enough cost. However, they are trying to keep the "brain" in the US.

Look at all the top robotic transmission/motion suppliers; none are from the US:

  • Leaderdrive (China): Harmonic reducers
  • Harmonic Drive (Japan): Harmonic reducers
  • Nabtesco (Japan): RV reducers
  • Sanhua Intelligent (China): Linear actuator assemblies
  • Zhejiang Shuanghuan Transmission (China): RV reducers/gears
  • Shenzhen Inovance Technology (China): Servo systems/ball screws

There is a core reason behind this:

China currently controls nearly 70% of global rare earth mining, and more critically, holds 85% to 90% of global refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of finished rare earth magnet manufacturing.

Therefore, the biggest threat is: Chinese export controls pose a structural risk hanging over US robotics projects.

Beijing has already demonstrated a willingness to weaponize this monopoly, as Japan did in a similar situation.

To break the dependence on the robotics and Optimus supply chain and ensure the robot revolution can proceed domestically, Western capital needs to flow to companies rebuilding the rare earth ecosystem, covering:

  • Upstream mining
  • Midstream separation/metallization
  • Downstream magnet manufacturing

If the global number of humanoid robots reaches 1 billion by 2050—a baseline scenario in Morgan Stanley's model—it would require approximately 400,000 tons of neodymium, 80,000 tons of dysprosium, and 16,000 tons of terbium. This would consume about 15% of the world's known neodymium reserves, 25% of dysprosium reserves, and 30% of terbium reserves, constituting a demand shock.

In short: China has control over the US robotics hardware supply chain.

Now is the historical moment when the US must invest in securing its own supply chain to ensure victory in the robotics race with China.

The key lies in rare earths, a prerequisite for producing robotic humanoid hardware at competitive prices.

Here are the areas the US government needs to focus on:

1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors)

Neodymium (Nd) and Praseodymium (Pr): These "light rare earths" are the core components of NdFeB magnets

Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb): Rare earth elements alloyed into magnets

Samarium (Sm) and Cobalt (Co): Used to make SmCo magnets

Boron (B) and Iron (Fe): Key stabilizing minerals, accounting for about 1% of the weight of NdFeB magnets

2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic reducers and planetary roller screws)

Titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), and Molybdenum (Mo): Gears in harmonic reducers and threaded shafts in planetary roller screws

Niobium (Nb), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), and Manganese (Mn): Critical microalloying elements added to structural steel to improve toughness, prevent corrosion, and significantly reduce robot joint weight

Cerium (Ce) and Lanthanum (La): Prevent premature failure of robot gears

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Brain, Eyes, and Battery)

Gallium (Ga) and Germanium (Ge): Indispensable for advanced semiconductors, LiDAR systems, and high-frequency communication chips

Lithium (Li), Graphite (C), and Copper (Cu): A single full-size humanoid robot requires approximately 2 kg of lithium, 3 kg of graphite, and up to 6.5 kg of copper

Key Company List

The most important US companies to secure the above capabilities are:

1. Magnet Metals (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, Sm, Gd):

$UUUU, $MP, $ALOY, $USAR, $LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths), $NEO (TSX), $ILU, $ARU (ASX)

2. Structural Metallurgy (Nb, V, Ti, Be):

$ATI, $CRS, $FCX, $NB, $MTRN, $LGO

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Ga, Ge, Graphite, Battery Metals):

$BMM, $VNP, $TECK, $ALB, $EAF, $ALTM, $SYR, $FCX, $AW1 (ASX)

Taking a robot joint as an example, it is a permanent magnet motor requiring a neodymium processing supply chain:

1. Neo Performance Materials (TSX: NEO)

2. $MP

3. $UUUU—Processes monazite concentrate into NdPr oxide

The US government should meticulously review the Bill of Materials (BOM) for each robotics supply chain and then invest heavily to ensure processing capacity for raw materials.

Currently, the transmission systems needed to manufacture humanoid robots, as well as the global infrastructure to produce these components, are highly concentrated in China.

The US is highly vulnerable in the physical robotics supply chain. Securing domestic metal and midstream processing capabilities is crucial for competing with China.

The US must invest heavily in critical material supply chains today to maintain long-term dominance in the robotics industry.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of global rare earth refining and separation capacity does China control?

AChina controls 85% to 90% of the global rare earth refining and separation capacity.

QWhat is the core structural risk for the U.S. humanoid robot industry mentioned in the text?

AThe core structural risk is that China holds a 'shutdown key' over the U.S. robotics hardware supply chain, as it dominates the production of actuators, reducers, metallurgy, and the raw materials required.

QWhich two Chinese companies are listed as suppliers of harmonic and RV reducers for humanoid robots?

ALeaderdrive (harmonic reducer) and Double Ring Transmission (RV reducer/gears) are the Chinese companies mentioned.

QWhat massive demand shock for rare earths is predicted if 1 billion humanoid robots are built by 2050?

AIt would require approximately 400,000 tons of Neodymium (consuming 15% of global reserves), 80,000 tons of Dysprosium (25% of reserves), and 16,000 tons of Terbium (30% of reserves).

QWhat are the three key areas the U.S. government should focus on to secure its supply chain for robotics, as outlined in the article?

AThe three key areas are: 1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors), 2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic drives and planetary roller screws), and 3. Computing, Perception & Power (for the brain, eyes, and battery).

Related Reads

Retail Ecology Dwindles, ZKsync Bets on Bank Pilots for a Breakthrough

Amidst declining retail activity, ZKsync is pivoting to target institutional banking as its primary growth strategy. The article explores this shift, contrasting it with the competitive "survival of the fittest" narrative by highlighting a cooperative model inspired by naturalist Peter Kropotkin. ZKsync is developing infrastructure like its private, permissioned Prividium suite for banks (e.g., Deutsche Bank's use case via Memento), enabling private transactions with public verifiability via zero-knowledge proofs. This appeals to institutions needing privacy, compliance, and Ethereum-based settlement security, unlike fully private chains (e.g., JPMorgan's Kinaxis) or consortium models (e.g., R3 Corda). However, this strategic focus has coincided with a steep decline in its public DeFi ecosystem, evidenced by plunging TVL and the departure of major protocols like Aave due to low fees. The network's future now hinges on banking adoption, with upcoming pilots like the Cari Network involving regional banks holding over $600 billion in deposits. A significant challenge is balancing this institutional focus with ZKsync's decentralized governance. Banks must operate on a network where rules and fees (denominated in the volatile ZK token) can be changed via community vote, and where a Security Council holds emergency control—a stark contrast to the predictable, contract-bound environments of traditional finance. The coming 18 months will test whether ZKsync can successfully onboard traditional banks onto a dynamically governed public chain or if institutions will ultimately revert to proprietary solutions.

Foresight News17m ago

Retail Ecology Dwindles, ZKsync Bets on Bank Pilots for a Breakthrough

Foresight News17m ago

The Recursive AI Anthropic Warned About: Tian Yuandong's New Company Has Just Taken the "First Step"

Anthropic recently highlighted the rapid progress toward "recursive self-improvement," where AI systems autonomously design and train their successors. In response, Recursive Superintelligence, a new company co-founded by former Meta researcher Tian Yuan Dong, has publicly demonstrated its first step toward automating AI research. The company released a system designed to autonomously execute the full AI research cycle: generating ideas, implementing code, running experiments, and learning from results. It validated this approach by achieving state-of-the-art results on three diverse benchmarks: 1. **NanoChat Autoresearch:** Optimizing a small language model's validation loss under a fixed 5-minute GPU budget, improving upon the community's best result. 2. **NanoGPT Speedrun:** Reducing the time to train a GPT model to a specific loss on 8 H100 GPUs from 79.7 seconds to 77.5 seconds, beating a highly optimized, human-driven community effort. 3. **SOL-ExecBench:** Improving the overall score on NVIDIA's suite of 235 GPU kernel optimization tasks by 18%, closing the gap to the hardware limit. The system discovered novel optimizations in this highly specialized domain without direct human expertise. Recursive's system operates as a general framework, capable of parallel exploration and cross-task knowledge transfer while incorporating safeguards against reward hacking. The company, backed by $650M in funding and a star-studded team including Richard Socher and Alexey Dosovitskiy, aims to create AI that recursively enhances its own research capabilities. This development represents an early but concrete move toward a new paradigm where AI accelerates its own advancement. It occurs alongside Anthropic's warnings about the need for industry coordination and potential pauses when recursive self-improvement thresholds are reached, highlighting the dual trajectory of rapid technical progress and growing calls for careful stewardship.

marsbit25m ago

The Recursive AI Anthropic Warned About: Tian Yuandong's New Company Has Just Taken the "First Step"

marsbit25m ago

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

"Gold Buying Guide: Focus on Interest Rates, Not Just War" Four months ago, gold buyers likely didn't anticipate buying at a peak that even a war couldn't sustain. After hitting a record high of $5,596 on January 29, gold entered a bear market just 91 days later, its fastest decline since 2008. A key trigger was the Fed's hawkish shift, highlighting that monetary policy, not geopolitics, is the primary driver. The article argues that the traditional "buy gold in turmoil" script has changed. While the US-Iran conflict initially boosted prices, the sustained rally in oil prices heightened inflation fears, forcing central banks to maintain or consider tighter policy. Since gold yields no interest, higher rates increase its opportunity cost, eroding its appeal. This dynamic was evident when gold fell sharply on May 18 despite positive peace talks, as lower oil prices eased inflation and thus rate hike pressures. The recent sell-off is also part of a broader market deleveraging. Correlations between gold, Nasdaq, and Bitcoin spiked as leveraged investors sold liquid assets to cover losses, creating a synchronized downturn. Historically, gold bottoms align with policy shifts, not conflict resolutions. The 2008 and 2022 bear markets ended with shifts to extreme easing and peak inflation expectations, respectively. For potential buyers, the author suggests monitoring three signals: 1) Peak interest rate hike expectations, 2) Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz (to ease oil/inflation pressure), and 3) A return to net inflows for Gold ETFs, indicating the end of forced selling. While predicting the exact bottom is impossible, the author's personal strategy involves scaling into a position across price levels like $4000, $3700, and $3500, committing no more than 30% of the intended total allocation initially, and adding the remainder only if key signals emerge. The core conclusion: In turbulent times, watching interest rates is more crucial than watching wars.

marsbit31m ago

The Gold Buy-on-the-Dip Guide: Watch Interest Rates, Not Just War

marsbit31m ago

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

This article analyzes the current state of the Solana meme coin and community token ecosystem, highlighting a market caught between two dominant forces: attention-based PvP and a gradual return to community-centric projects. The first part explores the "Attention PvP" dynamic, where success is driven by celebrity endorsements, viral events, and speed. Examples include $JOTCHUA, which surged after its meme creator's social media activity, and $WORLDCUP, which outperformed a similar Base chain project ($PITCH) largely due to influencer support. The recent "pump.fun GO" feature, allowing bounty tasks for token promotion, is critiqued for fostering sensationalist and often negative stunts—like people getting token tickers tattooed on their bodies for rewards—reminiscent of old internet shock content. In contrast, the article points to a resurgence of organic, community-driven tokens that survive market volatility through strong holder bases and shared ideology, not just hype. Influencer Ansem is cited, arguing that durable meme coins rely on communities willing to endure losses and promote their core message daily. Examples given are older tokens like $neet (anti-work ethos), $troll, $buttcoin, and $triplet, which have maintained relative price stability. A prime example of this community-build model is the new project $KINS, the token for the browser-based MMORPG Kintara. Its success stems not from advanced graphics but from consistently delivering updates, fostering player trust, and creating genuine engagement (e.g., in-game economies, events, property auctions). It has attracted a growing player base and even notable KOLs as participants, demonstrating that sustainable growth can come from building trust rather than orchestrating pumps. The article concludes by questioning whether the market is ultimately a game of mutual trust or mutual deception, expressing hope that such reflection might lead to a healthier ecosystem.

marsbit31m ago

Recent On-Chain Review: No Clear Narrative Under U.S. Stock Market Pressure, Just Hype

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片