90% of Rare Earth Refining is in China's Hands, American Humanoid Robot Mass Production Faces a Hardware Bottleneck

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-16Last updated on 2026-03-16

Abstract

The article highlights a critical vulnerability in the U.S. ambition to mass-produce humanoid robots like Optimus: China’s dominance over the hardware supply chain, particularly rare earth elements (REEs). China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85–90% of refining capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet production—key components in actuators, motors, and sensors essential for robotic joints and drivetrains. Major U.S. robotics firms rely heavily on Chinese and Japanese suppliers for critical components such as harmonic reducers, servo systems, and precision gears, while retaining only the AI "brain" domestically. In a scenario with 1 billion humanoid robots by 2050, Morgan Stanley estimates massive demand for neodymium, dysprosium, and terbium—consuming significant portions of global reserves. The author urges the U.S. to invest in rebuilding its rare earth supply chain—from mining and refining to magnet production—and lists key firms involved in magnet metals, structural metallurgy, and semiconductors. Without secure, cost-competitive access to these materials, U.S. robotics growth faces a structural risk, with China holding a potential "shut-off switch" over hardware production.

Author: Serenity

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Intro: All the discussions about the robot revolution focus on AI and software, but this tweet points out a more fundamental structural risk: China controls 70% of global rare earth mining, 85-90% of refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of rare earth magnet manufacturing. The joints and actuators of humanoid robots like Optimus all rely on Chinese or Japanese suppliers; what the US retains is just the "brain." The author uses specific material lists and Morgan Stanley's demand forecasts to quantify this bottleneck, projecting its impact on rare earth reserves in the era of 1 billion humanoid robots.

Full Text Below:

The United States is losing the robot and humanoid robot race with China.

Software and AI are only half the battle.

China holds a kill switch over the US robotics hardware supply chain because: The US cannot manufacture the materials needed for humanoid robots at scale and at a reasonable cost.

If China presses this "kill switch," the entire US robotics build-out will slow down—because China has dominant control over the "body" (actuators, reducers, metallurgy) and the raw materials required to manufacture humanoid robots.

Consequently, US robotics companies have signed contracts with Chinese manufacturers to procure all humanoid robot components, in order to assemble products like Optimus at a low enough cost. However, they are trying to keep the "brain" in the US.

Look at all the top robotic transmission/motion suppliers; none are from the US:

  • Leaderdrive (China): Harmonic reducers
  • Harmonic Drive (Japan): Harmonic reducers
  • Nabtesco (Japan): RV reducers
  • Sanhua Intelligent (China): Linear actuator assemblies
  • Zhejiang Shuanghuan Transmission (China): RV reducers/gears
  • Shenzhen Inovance Technology (China): Servo systems/ball screws

There is a core reason behind this:

China currently controls nearly 70% of global rare earth mining, and more critically, holds 85% to 90% of global refining and separation capacity, and over 90% of finished rare earth magnet manufacturing.

Therefore, the biggest threat is: Chinese export controls pose a structural risk hanging over US robotics projects.

Beijing has already demonstrated a willingness to weaponize this monopoly, as Japan did in a similar situation.

To break the dependence on the robotics and Optimus supply chain and ensure the robot revolution can proceed domestically, Western capital needs to flow to companies rebuilding the rare earth ecosystem, covering:

  • Upstream mining
  • Midstream separation/metallization
  • Downstream magnet manufacturing

If the global number of humanoid robots reaches 1 billion by 2050—a baseline scenario in Morgan Stanley's model—it would require approximately 400,000 tons of neodymium, 80,000 tons of dysprosium, and 16,000 tons of terbium. This would consume about 15% of the world's known neodymium reserves, 25% of dysprosium reserves, and 30% of terbium reserves, constituting a demand shock.

In short: China has control over the US robotics hardware supply chain.

Now is the historical moment when the US must invest in securing its own supply chain to ensure victory in the robotics race with China.

The key lies in rare earths, a prerequisite for producing robotic humanoid hardware at competitive prices.

Here are the areas the US government needs to focus on:

1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors)

Neodymium (Nd) and Praseodymium (Pr): These "light rare earths" are the core components of NdFeB magnets

Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium (Tb): Rare earth elements alloyed into magnets

Samarium (Sm) and Cobalt (Co): Used to make SmCo magnets

Boron (B) and Iron (Fe): Key stabilizing minerals, accounting for about 1% of the weight of NdFeB magnets

2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic reducers and planetary roller screws)

Titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), and Molybdenum (Mo): Gears in harmonic reducers and threaded shafts in planetary roller screws

Niobium (Nb), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), and Manganese (Mn): Critical microalloying elements added to structural steel to improve toughness, prevent corrosion, and significantly reduce robot joint weight

Cerium (Ce) and Lanthanum (La): Prevent premature failure of robot gears

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Brain, Eyes, and Battery)

Gallium (Ga) and Germanium (Ge): Indispensable for advanced semiconductors, LiDAR systems, and high-frequency communication chips

Lithium (Li), Graphite (C), and Copper (Cu): A single full-size humanoid robot requires approximately 2 kg of lithium, 3 kg of graphite, and up to 6.5 kg of copper

Key Company List

The most important US companies to secure the above capabilities are:

1. Magnet Metals (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, Sm, Gd):

$UUUU, $MP, $ALOY, $USAR, $LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths), $NEO (TSX), $ILU, $ARU (ASX)

2. Structural Metallurgy (Nb, V, Ti, Be):

$ATI, $CRS, $FCX, $NB, $MTRN, $LGO

3. Computing Power, Perception & Power Supply (Ga, Ge, Graphite, Battery Metals):

$BMM, $VNP, $TECK, $ALB, $EAF, $ALTM, $SYR, $FCX, $AW1 (ASX)

Taking a robot joint as an example, it is a permanent magnet motor requiring a neodymium processing supply chain:

1. Neo Performance Materials (TSX: NEO)

2. $MP

3. $UUUU—Processes monazite concentrate into NdPr oxide

The US government should meticulously review the Bill of Materials (BOM) for each robotics supply chain and then invest heavily to ensure processing capacity for raw materials.

Currently, the transmission systems needed to manufacture humanoid robots, as well as the global infrastructure to produce these components, are highly concentrated in China.

The US is highly vulnerable in the physical robotics supply chain. Securing domestic metal and midstream processing capabilities is crucial for competing with China.

The US must invest heavily in critical material supply chains today to maintain long-term dominance in the robotics industry.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of global rare earth refining and separation capacity does China control?

AChina controls 85% to 90% of the global rare earth refining and separation capacity.

QWhat is the core structural risk for the U.S. humanoid robot industry mentioned in the text?

AThe core structural risk is that China holds a 'shutdown key' over the U.S. robotics hardware supply chain, as it dominates the production of actuators, reducers, metallurgy, and the raw materials required.

QWhich two Chinese companies are listed as suppliers of harmonic and RV reducers for humanoid robots?

ALeaderdrive (harmonic reducer) and Double Ring Transmission (RV reducer/gears) are the Chinese companies mentioned.

QWhat massive demand shock for rare earths is predicted if 1 billion humanoid robots are built by 2050?

AIt would require approximately 400,000 tons of Neodymium (consuming 15% of global reserves), 80,000 tons of Dysprosium (25% of reserves), and 16,000 tons of Terbium (30% of reserves).

QWhat are the three key areas the U.S. government should focus on to secure its supply chain for robotics, as outlined in the article?

AThe three key areas are: 1. Magnet Metals (for frameless torque motors), 2. Structural Metallurgy (for harmonic drives and planetary roller screws), and 3. Computing, Perception & Power (for the brain, eyes, and battery).

Related Reads

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

**Summary: Key Events and Developments to Watch (August 3-9)** The upcoming week is marked by significant financial disclosures, key legislative deadlines, and notable product updates. **Major Financial Events:** Several companies are scheduled to release their Q2 2026 earnings. American Bitcoin (ABTC) will report on August 3, followed by SpaceX and Hut 8 Mining Corp. on August 4, and Circle on August 5. Notably, a significant portion of SpaceX shares (up to 12% of total shares) will be unlocked on August 6 following their earnings release. **Key Legislative Deadline:** The U.S. Senate faces an August 7 deadline to secure 60 votes for the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The Senate may hold a full vote on the bill during the week. **Economic Data:** The U.S. July Non-Farm Payrolls report will be released on August 7, providing crucial labor market data. **Technology & Product Updates:** * **Shutdowns:** DeFi portfolio tracker Zapper and wallet app Ctrl Wallet will cease operations on August 3. * **Upgrades:** LayerZero will deprecate its v1 relayers on August 3. XRP Ledger's new version 3.3.0, featuring five new functions, is expected next week. * **AI:** Elon Musk announced that the advanced Grok 4.6 AI model is set for release around August 7. * **Bitcoin:** The BIP-110 forced signaling for a potential Bitcoin network change is scheduled to begin around August 8. **Other Notable Events:** Chinese robotics firm Unitree Tech has set its preliminary price inquiry for its IPO for August 5. South Korean exchange Upbit will delist AQT and AERGO tokens on August 3.

marsbit1h ago

Must-Watch Events Next Week|CLARITY Act Could Face Senate Vote; SpaceX, Circle to Report Earnings (8.3-8.9)

marsbit1h ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

Stock Markets Plunge Deeper Than Cryptocurrencies: Where Did the Money Go? In late July, Seoul's Kospi index triggered circuit breakers for two consecutive days, plummeting over 40% from its June high. The collapse was led by heavyweight stocks like SK Hynix, whose record profits still disappointed investors, and devastating leveraged ETFs, with one major product losing over 83% of its value. This signaled a global, forced deleveraging targeting the most crowded trades. Interestingly, while stocks exhibited extreme volatility akin to crypto markets, Bitcoin rose nearly 15% in July after a prior steep drop. Analysis shows the money fleeing equities did not flow into Bitcoin. Instead, Bitcoin had already absorbed its sell-off in May-June, when U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw historic outflows. The true safe-haven beneficiary was gold, whose price rose over 20% year-on-year, highlighting a decoupling between Bitcoin and gold as "digital gold." The sell-off was a targeted unwinding of leveraged positions in tech and semiconductors, accelerated by broker-dealer risk management and shifts in the AI narrative, including new competition from Chinese memory chipmakers. The retreat path was clear: from high-valuation tech stocks to cash and U.S. Treasuries, then to gold. For Bitcoin to attract sustained institutional inflows, conditions like eased global liquidity pressure, a "soft-landing" Fed rate cut, and U.S. regulatory clarity via legislation like the stalled CLARITY Act are needed. Currently, Bitcoin is not a safe haven but an already-cleared asset. Its low correlation with tech stocks, however, makes it a potential diversification play for institutional portfolios once the storm passes. The money isn't here yet, but the positioning is underway.

marsbit1h ago

Stocks Are Plummeting More Sharply Than Cryptocurrencies. Where Has the Money Gone?

marsbit1h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit5h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片