Gemini Earn暂停提现,分析GUSD对合作方MakerDAO的影响

PanewsPublished on 2022-11-17Last updated on 2022-11-17

Abstract

传言称MakerDAO受到Gemini Earn暂停提现的影响,实际可能并非如此。

Gemini Earn暂停提现,有传言称MakerDAO有5亿美元的资金被冻结在了Gemini Earn当中,实际并非如此,此事对于GUSD和合作方MakerDAO的影响可能较小。

11月16日晚,数据分析平台Nansen的首席运营官Alex Svanevik在社交媒体上发布了GUSD的数据。有4.8亿在MakerDAO的PSM合约中,占GUSD总量的73%;最近7天,GUSD遭遇了大量赎回。GUSD正是由加密交易所Gemini发行的。

受3AC和FTX暴雷的影响,加密借贷平台Genesis宣布暂停提款,也导致Gemini的Earn产品暂停提现。数据显示,过去24小时,Gemini交易所的资金流出了8.5亿美元,似乎和FTX遭到挤兑初期时的状况相似。

DeFi与CeFi的结合能够增强DeFi的盈利能力,但这种可组合性也将使CeFi的风险有可能蔓延到DeFi中。那么此次Gemini Earn产品的风险是否会传导至GUSD,并影响到MakerDAO呢?

Genesis的风险

导致Gemini出现风险的根源在于Genesis,倘若Genesis解决了自身的问题,Gemini的危机自然也就迎刃而解。

我们知道,Genesis和管理着大量加密资产的Grayscale(灰度)同属于DCG旗下。在Genesis宣布暂停提现后,市场上曾经出现DCG可能关闭Grayscale,以利用锁定的BTC来拯救Genesis的传言。虽然这种可能性较低,但也说明Genesis的母公司实力较强。此前Genesis称有1.75亿美元的资金锁定在FTX的交易账户中,但Grayscale仅依靠2%的管理费,就可以产生每年2亿美元的收入,这可能已经超过了Genesis的亏空。

虽然Genesis和Grayscale同属于一个大股东,但两者独立运作,理论上也存在让Genesis破产,Grayscale继续赚钱的可能性。Gemini称,Genesis及其母公司DCG承诺尽其所能地履行对客户的义务,这可能减轻人们的担忧。

Genesis的风险敞口并不算特别大,仍然有通过融资,恢复正常运营的可能。有消息指出,币安CEO赵长鹏和加密做市商B2C2希望购买Genesis的部分贷款,倘若交易完成,Genesis有望摆脱危机。

Gemini的风险隔离

按照当前的情况,Gemini Earn能否恢复正常,完全取决于Genesis。但即使Gemini Earn的问题不能解决,风险能够传导至整个Gemini交易所也还是小概率事件。

根据Gemini的描述,Gemini是一个完全储备的交易所,Gemini Trust Company, LLC 是纽约银行法规定的受托人和合格托管人,并获得纽约州金融服务部 (NYDFS) 的许可。按照NYDFS的要求,Gemini任何时候都必须持有超过客户存款的资本,并且必须向监管机构报告资本的重大变化。

Gemini表示,对风险进行了隔离,交易所用户的资金可以随时取出。即使是同样能够获得收益的Staking业务,也和Earn是独立的。

这一做法的好处是每次暴雷的风险可控,但如果一旦发生小范围的暴雷,在当前情况下就会因为FUD造成资金的大面积赎回。

与之相比,FTX和Alameda Research则采用了完全相反的方式。即便两者是独立的公司,FTX也向Alameda Research暴露了无限的风险敞口。一旦风险暴露,两者便整体破产。

GUSD的风险

根据Dai Stats的数据,通过GUSD PSM产生的DAI数量约为4.91亿,已经接近上限的5亿,与Alex Svanevik公布的数据相比进一步上升。说明确实可能有持有GUSD的用户担忧GUSD出现问题,通过PSM直接将GUSD 1:1的兑换成了流动性更好的DAI。

这并不意味着GUSD和MakerDAO就会出现问题。MakerDAO也在今日指出,GUSD的储备和Gemini Earn是隔离开的,MakerDAO、Maker协议和DAI稳定币并未以任何方式投资于Gemini Earn或相关的产品。每发行的1 GUSD都有对应的美元支持。

GUSD虽然此前存在感不强,但也是最合规的稳定币之一。2018年,纽约金融服务局(NYDFS)批准了Paxos的PAX和Gemini的GUSD的发行,这正是第一批合规的稳定币。

Gemini官网公布了GUSD的储备报告和由独立的注册会计师事务所BPM LLP每月出具的审计报告。截至9月30日,GUSD的储备金共计约3.31亿美元,此时发行的GUSD数量为3.3亿,有足够的储备,储备资产中约98%是以现金的形式存在。

GUSD的快速增长是在和MakerDAO合作之后。9月29日,Gemini的联合创始人兼首席执行官Tyler Winklevoss在MakerDAO论坛发布了GUSD和MakerDAO合作公告的帖子,将从10月1日开始,向MakerDAO PSM中的GUSD提供年化1.25%的固定收益率。相关阅读:《Coinbase和Gemini的“拉储”之争,MakerDAO躺赢》

虽然Alex Svanevik称GUSD在最近一周遭遇了大量赎回,但一周前GUSD的流通量几乎刚好处于最高点。根据CoinGecko的数据,截至11月17日,GUSD的流通量为6.34亿,与11月11日的历史最高点8.7亿相比,确实下降了27.1%。若将时间拉长,从Gemini和MakerDAO合作开始计算,从9月底开始,这段时间GUSD的流通量增长了92%。

小结

虽然Gemini因为Earn暂停提现,交易所遭遇资金出逃,GUSD的流通量与最高点相比也下降了27.1%,且MakerDAO PSM中的GUSD已经接近上限,链上流动性可能不足。

但根据当前的情况,GUSD的储备金和受影响的Gemini Earn是独立的,GUSD是最合规的稳定币之一,也有每月进行审计,并没有证据表明GUSD会受到影响,MakerDAO因此而受到牵连的概率也极低。倘若GUSD出现问题,那就意味着目前所有中心化稳定币的审计都形同虚设,其它稳定币也将遭遇信任危机。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Report Interpretation: J.P. Morgan Details Micron's Pre-Earnings Sentiment, Current Hardware Sector Dynamics

Morgan Stanley analyst Joshua Meyers' report (June 21, 2026) highlights key trends in the hardware and semiconductor sector ahead of Micron's earnings. The core takeaways are: 1. **Micron & Memory:** Memory remains a high-conviction long theme, driven by strong AI demand and rising ASPs. However, investor focus is shifting to the sustainability of Micron's >80% gross margins and the specifics of potential new long-term supply agreements (SCAs). 2. **Hardware Supply Chain:** AI-related demand for servers, networking, and storage remains robust, but company performance is diverging. Celestica (CLS) shows improved margin confidence, Western Digital and Seagate benefit from pricing, Fabrinet (FN) sees predictable AI optics growth, and Teradyne (TER) anticipates a new Google customer. 3. **AI Capex & WFE Forecasts:** JPMorgan increased its Wafer Fab Equipment (WFE) market growth forecasts to 28% in 2026 and 29% in 2027. AI infrastructure financing is evolving, with higher project-level debt reducing constraints on capex expansion. The report signals that while the AI-driven hardware cycle is strong, the market is entering a phase focused on execution verification (e.g., Micron's SCA details, Fabrinet's ramp with Amazon) and valuation sustainability. Key near-term signals include Micron's guidance, Arista Networks' outlook, and the pace of demand normalization post potential tariff-related pull-ins.

marsbit7h ago

Report Interpretation: J.P. Morgan Details Micron's Pre-Earnings Sentiment, Current Hardware Sector Dynamics

marsbit7h ago

Research Report Analysis: The Fed's New Chair's Debut – New Leader, But Same Script?

Report Analysis: Federal Reserve's New Chair Debut – A New Captain, But the Same Script? Morgan Stanley's chief global economist Seth B. Carpenter analyzes the first FOMC meeting under new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh in a June 21 report. Warsh deliberately avoided providing forward guidance on interest rates, aligning with his philosophy. However, market expectations for a rate hike this year were reinforced. Key signals lie elsewhere: inflation may fall more than expected, and quantitative tightening (QT) could be more aggressive than anticipated. The FOMC's "dot plot" suggests only one rate hike in 2026. Carpenter argues that if inflation undershoots forecasts, the logic for even a single hike weakens, especially as projections indicate potential rate cuts in 2027. On QT, Warsh's stance is clear. Carpenter notes that measures like halving the Treasury's account balance could shrink the Fed's balance sheet by around $500 billion with minimal market impact. Combined with adjustments to reserve interest and liquidity rules, the ultimate QT scale may exceed expectations, though its market effect might be less disruptive unless the Fed actively sells Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS). While Warsh initiated a review of the Fed's policy framework, the 2% inflation target remains intact for now. The report concludes that the market may be overestimating the significance of reduced forward guidance and the near-term rate hike risk, while potentially underestimating the scope and manageable nature of the coming balance sheet reduction. The key debates will hinge on upcoming core PCE data, the specifics of the QT path, and the framework review's findings.

marsbit7h ago

Research Report Analysis: The Fed's New Chair's Debut – New Leader, But Same Script?

marsbit7h ago

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

This weekly analysis outlines a critical juncture for BTC and HYPE markets, focusing on key price level confirmations. **BTC Analysis:** BTC is at a pivotal point after a five-wave rally from the June 5th low of $59,100. The price has broken below a short-term rising channel's lower boundary, with the current move seen as a pullback to test this breakdown. Failure to reclaim this level could lead to a retest of the $59,000-$60,000 support zone. The core scenario hinges on this channel retest outcome. * **Key Levels:** Resistance at $64,500-$65,000 (channel boundary) and $69,500-$70,500. Support at $59,000-$60,000 and $55,000. * **Strategy:** A core bearish stance is maintained (20% short from last week), with short-term plans for tactical trades. Three detailed contingency plans (A/B/C) are provided for short positions on resistance tests or breakdowns, emphasizing strict stop-loss discipline. **HYPE Analysis:** HYPE shows strong momentum but is currently in a corrective phase after hitting a new high of $76.94. The price is retesting the crucial $64-$66 support area. * **Key Levels:** Resistance near $77 and $80-$82. Support at $64-$66 and $52-$54. * **Strategy:** The short-term approach is "buy on dips, avoid chasing rallies." A long position is considered only if clear stabilization signals appear at the $64-$66 or deeper $52-$54 support zones, with tight risk controls. **General Risk Management:** A standardized trailing stop-loss protocol is emphasized: set initial stop, breakeven at +1% profit, then trail stops upward to lock in gains. *Disclaimer: All analysis is presented as a personal trading framework, not investment advice. Market conditions are complex and require dynamic adjustment.*

marsbit7h ago

Critical Game Week: BTC Retracement Confirmation vs. HYPE Support Battle | Guest Analysis

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

428 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片