Could Ethereum [ETH] see more downside as withdrawals heighten

AmbcryptoPublished on 2022-11-13Last updated on 2022-11-13

Abstract

Ethereum could risk a further decline despite losing over 23% of its value to trade at $1,261 in the last seven days. The reason for this possibility was the high deviation of on-chain withdrawals of the altcoin.

Ethereum [ETH] could risk a further decline despite losing over 23% of its value to trade at $1,261 in the last seven days. The reason for this possibility was the high deviation of on-chain withdrawals of the altcoin.

“”

Onchain Edge, in a 11 November post on CryptoQuant, noted the state of these withdrawing transactions. In addition, he suggested that ETH investors might expect another price correction due to these actions.

“”

According to the publication, the possibility was on the higher side. Further, a correction at the current stage was not a bad omen for Ethereum in the long-term. While backing up his argument, he also pointed out that similar circumstances occurred in May and November 2021. The most recent one took place in May 2022.

“”

Onwards, what transpires?

“”

Per on-chain data, Glassnode revealed that Ethereum’s total inflow volume had significantly declined since 9 November. The decrease was definitely not void of the distrust that has rocked the ecosystem since the FTX collapse. With these low exchange deposits, it implied that more investors were looking at other options to store their ETH. While this data might indicate less selling pressure, it was likely that much less activity was the reason for this decline.

Source: Glassnode

“”

In addition to this disinterest in trading on exchanges, the derivatives market was not left out. Further Glassnode revelation showed that the futures volume in the last 24 hours was an extremely negative value across all exchanges. At press time, Binance futures volume had shredded $8.31 billion within the aforementioned period.

“”

This indicated one of the worst interest levels since 2022 began. Hence, this on-chain status, if not improved in the coming days, could align with the premonition of a further price decrease.

Source: Glassnode

“”

To a greater extent, Santiment showed that the possibility was not out of the question. As of this writing, the on-chain data analysis platform revealed that the 30-day Market Value to Realized (MVRV) ratio was -7.723%. At that value, it implied that ETH investors had recently been in losses.

“”

Additionally, profits gathered earlier, especially on exchanges, were now in ruins. Similarly, the MVRV Z-score was negative at -0.0263. Hence, the realized cap value had high potential to be worth more than the undiluted market capitalization.

Source: Santiment

“”

Get ready for more rip ups

“”

However, indications from the Exponential Moving Average (EMA) showed that it could be time for a correction. This was due to the 50 EMA (yellow) already in pole position to go above the 20 EMA (blue).

“”

On the occasion it finally crosses, sellers might finally take control of the market and the price decreases lower than the current $1,200 current region. In the mid to long term, the 200 EMA (purple) indicated that the correction would eventually lead to a price revival. Nevertheless, it might be necessary to exercise caution before assuming the decline would be an inevitable event.

Source: TradingView

Related Reads

Behind the 67,000 Semiconductor Talent Shortage: U.S. Industrial Policy Game and Implications for China

The U.S. push to reshore semiconductor manufacturing faces a core challenge: a significant talent shortage. While over $770 billion in investments are planned across 160 projects, a key hurdle is finding enough people to run the new fabs. According to industry projections, the U.S. could face a shortage of approximately 67,000 technicians, engineers, and computer scientists by 2030. This shortage is multi-faceted. It includes not only high-level chip design engineers requiring advanced degrees but also a substantial need for technicians to operate and maintain fab equipment. Technician roles, while often requiring less formal education, are hard to fill due to factors like shift work, factory locations, and local community infrastructure. Conversely, for high-end engineers, the issue is less about salary—which is already competitive—and more about intense competition for specialized skills from other tech sectors and the long lead time to develop such expertise. The geographic dispersion of new investments complicates recruitment, as fabs need large numbers of local, stable employees. In response, U.S. policy emphasizes building workforce development as critical infrastructure. Strategies include expanding community college programs for technician training, fostering industry-education partnerships, and pursuing immigration reforms for high-skilled talent, aiming to balance immediate needs with long-term domestic pipeline development. For China, the key takeaway is the need to integrate talent supply planning with factory construction from the outset. This involves requiring companies to submit workforce plans, strengthening vocational education aligned with industry needs, and building supportive local ecosystems to retain talent. Ultimately, a sustainable semiconductor industry depends not just on building fabs, but on cultivating a continuous, local talent pipeline capable of keeping them running and advancing.

marsbit32m ago

Behind the 67,000 Semiconductor Talent Shortage: U.S. Industrial Policy Game and Implications for China

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片