市场遭遇雷曼危机,FTX抛售风暴继续

Foresight ResearchPublished on 2022-11-13Last updated on 2022-11-13

Abstract

市场遭遇雷曼危机,FTX抛售风暴继续。

一、市场观点

“”

1、宏观流动性

“”

货币流动性放缓。美国支柱产业形成失业潮,为避免紧缩过度对经济造成破坏,美联储12月大概率会放缓加息强度至50基点,流动性压力减轻。若中期选举共和党夺得国会众议院控制权,有利于缓解民主党单边强势作风,可能促成美联储实现鸽派转向。美元指数出现小幅回落,涨势似乎已经见顶。美股这周集体下跌,加密市场因为FTX交易所破产创下两年新低。

2、全市场行情

“”

市值排名前100涨幅榜:

本周加密市场崩盘式下跌,BTC下跌20%。交易所FTX的流动性危机有恶化风险,影响或超过LUNA和三箭事件,后续市场或面临强监管。以SBF系的FTT、SOL、APT为首的山寨币全线暴跌。

“”

1) FTT:

FTX交易所及关联方Alameda基金约有80亿美元亏空,被挤兑暂停提款。币安调查后放弃收购FTX,部分借贷给FTX的机构也传出资不抵债。Coinbase交易所或受益合规竞争对手减少。中心化交易所爆雷,长期利好Defi。

“”

2) SOL:

SBF是Solana链的长期支持者,长期看Solana生态将受严重打击。SOL节点开始解锁质押跑路,OK等交易所暂停Solana链充提。相关的SOL、SRM、RAY、RNDR等均暴跌。

“”

3、BTC行情

“”

1)链上数据

“”

ETH受益网络活动激增,转向净通缩。自 2022 年 9 月 15 日ETH完成合并以来,由于市场波动导致链上活动激增,ETH供应量实现通缩,减少约 10 枚 ETH。ETH 的表现优于 BTC。BTC矿工又到了停机阈值。一些矿工似乎已过度扩张,用于债务支出或基础设施建设的现金支出已超过现金收入。BTC活跃地址趋势表明链上网络使用量仍在下降。

长期趋势指标MVRV-ZScore以市场总成本作为依据,反映市场总体盈利状态。当指标大于6时,是顶部区间;当指标小于2时,是底部区间。MVRV跌破关键水平1,持有者总体上处于亏损状态。当前指标为-0.37,处于绿色抄底区间。

2)期货行情

“”

期货资金费率:本周市场更多转向看空,BTC费率-0.1%,个别品种FTT、SOL甚至出现-2.5%费率极值。费率0.05-0.1%,多头杠杆较多,是市场短期顶部;费率-0.1-0%,空头杠杆较多,是市场短期底部。

期货持仓量:本周总持仓量大幅下降,创出了21周新低,看涨势头消退。

期货多空比:2.2。散户在大举抄底,市场可能继续下跌。多空比数据波动大,参考意义有所削弱。

3)现货行情

“”

这周BTC创下两年新低,处于较为悲观的恐慌趋势。原本市场在反弹人心思涨之际,币安与FTX的对抗引发流动性挤兑,引发系统性风险。FTX不是第一个失败的大交易所,也不会是最后一个。面对华尔街大资本与中心化交易所的失败,去中心化的货币和金融将继续生存和繁荣。利好是杠杆出清加速见底,大盘行情拐点将在宏观流动性修复后见到,非常看好2023年加密市场的前景。

二、市场数据

“”

1. 公链总锁仓量情况

本周TVL总量下降9.45b,下降幅度为17.5%;其中以Solana跌幅最大,单周TVL下跌量达55%,ETH链整体下降约为15%,Polygon链表现最佳,整体下跌11%,其余各链下跌幅度基本在25%附近。

本周TVL总量下降9.45b,下降幅度为17.5%;其中以Solana跌幅最大,单周TVL下跌量达55%,ETH链整体下降约为15%,Polygon链表现最佳,整体下跌11%,其余各链下跌幅度基本在25%附近。

“”

2.各链协议锁仓量情况

“”

1)ETH锁仓量情况

2)BSC锁仓量情况

3)Tron锁仓量情况

4)Solana锁仓量情况

5)Avalanche锁仓量情况

6)Polygon锁仓量情况

7)Arbitrum锁仓量情况

8)Optimism锁仓量情况

3. ETH Gas fee历史情况

当前链上转账费用约为$1.95,Uniswap交易费用约为$6.64,Opensea的交易费用约为$2.58,本周受行情暴跌影响,连续几日出现Gas激增现象,Uniswap V3交易活跃,另外近期顶级量化交易机构Jump trading 2的账户24小时内Gas消耗达到343个ETH,排名前五。

“”

4. NFT市场数据变化

“”

NFT-500市值

各交易市场交易笔数:

NFT市场交易概览:

NFT总市值持续下降中,本周头部蓝筹NFT项目地板价均出现一定幅度下降,其中以CloneX下降13%,Otherdeed of otherside下降14%,下降幅度最大,另外每周交易量已连续三个月维持在70000个ETH附近,但从每周交易笔数上看,连续5周均出现持续降低;交易NFT的老用户自9月中旬开始持续降低,逐渐离场,首次购买NFT的用户开始出现小幅增长,目前单日地址基本达到1万附近。

Related Reads

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

**Missing the 20x Opportunity: A Simple 'Dumb' Approach to AI Investing** The AI boom, driving NVIDIA's revenue from $60B to $216B in two years, creates immense investment pressure. However, like the internet bubble of 2000, the largest AI opportunities likely lie ahead, perhaps after a correction. Instead of rushing in now or waiting paralyzed for a crash, the author proposes a third way: building a "knowledge warehouse" by systematically mapping the AI industry to be ready when opportunities arise. The core of the strategy is understanding AI's four-layer value chain: 1. **Compute Infrastructure (The "Engine"):** This foundational layer, where all money eventually flows, includes: a) **Chip Design:** NVIDIA's dominance via its CUDA ecosystem, b) **Chip Manufacturing/Packaging/Memory:** TSMC's near-monopoly in advanced manufacturing and SK Hynix's lead in High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), c) **Optical Interconnects:** Essential for large-scale AI clusters (e.g., Lumentum, Coherent), d) **Cooling & Power:** Critical for high-density AI data centers (e.g., Vertiv), e) **Servers/Data Centers & Cloud Platforms:** The physical and virtual wholesale providers. 2. **Models & Tools (The "OS"):** The competitive layer of foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI), now generating real revenue. A key shift is the center of gravity moving from **Training** models to **Inference** (running models), which demands different chip characteristics and could challenge NVIDIA's monopoly. 3. **Middleware & Platform ("The Glue"):** Connects models and applications (e.g., Scale AI, Hugging Face). This layer could explode if applications take off. 4. **Vertical Applications ("The Cash Register"):** Where AI meets end-users (e.g., enterprise AI, coding tools, medical AI, robotics). A critical cross-cutting constraint is **Energy**, as AI's massive power consumption drives investment in nuclear and other energy infrastructure. The author identifies four key questions for further research: 1) How will the shift from Training to Inference reshape the competitive landscape? 2) With tech giants spending over $600B on capex, where is the ROI from AI applications? 3) What are the under-the-radar opportunities in the "second" and "third" circles of the value chain (e.g., cooling, specialty foundries)? 4) How will geopolitics (e.g., U.S.-China chip restrictions) bifurcate the supply chain? The conclusion is that missed opportunities stem from insufficient research, not slow timing. By methodically studying each layer—its business models, competition, and valuations—investors can build the "killer intuition" needed to act decisively when the market presents its chance.

marsbit16m ago

After Missing the 20x, I've Found a 'Dumb' Method for AI Investing

marsbit16m ago

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbit1h ago

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片