$70 Million for a Downtime: ai.com Crashes Immediately After Launch

比推Published on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

A summary of the article titled "7,000 万美元买了个宕机:ai.com 上线即翻车". The article details the story behind the record-breaking $70 million purchase of the premium domain ai.com. The buyer was revealed to be Kris Marszalek, the co-founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com, not an AI giant like OpenAI or xAI as previously speculated. This transaction, finalized in April 2025 and paid for in cryptocurrency, ended a years-long bidding war for the highly sought-after domain, which had previously been linked to both OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI as a marketing tactic by its former owner. Following the purchase, Marszalek announced the launch of a new AI product on the domain, coinciding with the Super Bowl. The platform promised AI Agents that could perform tasks like stock trading and workflow automation. However, the highly anticipated launch was marred by technical issues, as the ai.com website experienced significant downtime and a "504" error within its first 48 hours of going live, leading to public criticism. The site was later restored, allowing users to register subdomains. The article concludes by contextualizing this extravagant purchase within a broader trend of crypto executives seeking mainstream legitimacy through high-profile investments. It cites other examples, including Aave's founder buying a multi-million-dollar mansion, Tether investing profits into various sectors, and Justin Sun acquiring hydroelectric power plants in Norway.

Author: Wenser, Odaily Planet Daily

Original Title: ai.com's Debut Fails! Crypto.com Spends $70 Million to Acquire the Most Expensive Domain, Only to Crash After Launch


Last weekend, aside from the "Bithumb Airdrops 620,000 BTC" misinformation incident, another breaking news story sparked widespread discussion: the mysterious buyer behind the premium domain ai.com has finally been revealed. Contrary to many expectations, the buyer was not from an AI giant but rather Kris Marszalek, the co-founder and CEO of the cryptocurrency exchange platform Crypto.com.

This transaction, finalized in April 2025, amounted to a staggering $70 million, giving the outside world a direct glimpse into the astonishing financial power of crypto moguls. This deal not only ended the ownership battle surrounding the domain but also drew a conclusion to the previous "premium domain pointing war" among giants like OpenAI and xAI.

The Battle for ai.com: A Three-Year, Sky-High Price Tag Transaction War

In November 2022, with the sudden emergence of ChatGPT (GPT 3.5), AI instantly became the prominent field of the era, and the prices of related domains naturally soared accordingly.

In February 2023, rumors suggested that OpenAI, the parent company behind ChatGPT, had purchased ai.com. This was later confirmed as fake news, though the domain's listed sale price of $11 million in 2021 was still jaw-dropping.

In August 2023, the ai.com domain's pointing address was changed to Musk's AI company xAI, which again attracted significant attention.

From then on, more information about this premium domain was uncovered: the domain was first registered in May 1993, making it over 30 years old, a veteran in the domain world. However, Musk remained indifferent to the matter, making the market realize once again that changing the domain's pointing address was merely a marketing tactic by the ai.com holder to "wait for the right price."

It reappeared in the public eye recently with the news of its "sale for a whopping $70 million."

Public information shows that Crypto.com co-founder and CEO Kris Marszalek successfully acquired this premium domain, setting one of the highest publicly disclosed domain transaction records to date; the deal was facilitated by domain broker Larry Fischer and paid for in cryptocurrency. For reference, this astronomical price is twice the selling price of the previous top-tier domain voice.com.

As an established crypto exchange platform founded in 2016, Crypto.com has long been renowned in the industry for its "massive marketing moves," having previously engaged in market promotion through sports sponsorships and celebrity endorsements; in 2021, it even spent $700 million just to secure the naming rights for a sports arena in Los Angeles.

In an interview with the media, Kris Marszalek revealed that he had "received even more outrageous resale offers but chose to hold onto the domain" because he believes it will be crucial for the future business's trust and recognition. Not only that, he boldly declared: "Back in the day, we fought our way out among thousands of crypto exchanges; this time, we will make ai.com a success again."

Thus, the years-long transaction war over the ai.com premium domain came to an end; just as the market was anticipating and speculating on how Kris Marszalek would use this domain, he unexpectedly "pulled a big one."

The Botched Product Launch: ai.com Crashes Within 48 Hours of Going Live

Crypto.com co-founder and CEO Kris Marszalek posted that after buying the domain, he had been quietly building and would launch the product during the Super Bowl on Sunday (February 8th). He later stated that, with the AI Agent on the ai.com platform, users would soon be able to deploy their own agents to perform a series of actions on their behalf, such as stock trading, automating workflows, using calendars to schedule and execute daily tasks, all while maintaining privacy, based on user permissions, and fully controlled by the user.

But amidst great anticipation, ai.com staged a "downtime drama" within less than 48 hours of its launch.

This morning, NVIDIA engineer yuhang posted, "This $70M domain, after $8M in ads (note: the general price of a Super Bowl ad) 504'd."

It has to be said, this incident happening once again validates that saying—"The whole world is just a slightly larger makeshift operation."

As of the time of writing, the ai.com website has returned to normal. Users can抢先 register personal subdomains and AI Agent subdomains to experience the platform's corresponding features later; as for whether it can deliver on the "autonomous AI Agent" promised in Kris Marszalek's grand vision, the author will reserve judgment for now.

The "Mainstreaming Path" of Crypto Moguls: Some Buy Houses, Some Buy Power Plants

Another hot topic brought up by Crypto.com co-founder and CEO spending $70 million on a premium domain is the various paths to mainstreaming that crypto moguls choose for themselves.

Previously, there was Justin Sun spending millions on a lunch with Warren Buffett. Recently, the moves by crypto moguls have become more diverse:

Aave founder Stani Kulechov bought a mansion worth £22 million (approximately $30 million) in London's Notting Hill last November.

Tether CEO Paolo focuses more on "putting eggs in different baskets." Reliable sources indicate that Tether has invested profits from its stablecoin business into 140 investments spanning agriculture to sports and plans to expand its workforce to 450 people; additionally, Tether's gold reserves exceed $23 billion.

Last November, Justin Sun, through his family office SunFund Energy, acquired two small hydropower plants in Norway at once, with a total capacity of 86 MW and an annual electricity generation of about 350 GWh, equivalent to the annual electricity consumption of 40,000 European households. In the era of the AI great navigation, the ever-bold Sun Yuchen chose to hold a "power ticket" to board this era's train.

Regardless of the investment outcomes, cryptocurrency is thereby becoming known to more people through various forms in the news—as a payment currency, a character symbol, an asset class. Perhaps this is an indispensable part of cryptocurrency's mainstreaming process.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7610580

Related Questions

QWho purchased the ai.com domain and for how much?

AKris Marszalek, the co-founder and CEO of Crypto.com, purchased the ai.com domain for $70 million.

QWhat was the main reason for the initial public attention on the ai.com website after its launch?

AThe ai.com website gained initial public attention because it experienced a宕机 (downtime) within 48 hours of its launch during the Super Bowl event.

QWhich other AI companies were previously rumored or associated with the ai.com domain before its sale?

AOpenAI was rumored to have purchased ai.com in 2023, which was later debunked, and Elon Musk's xAI company had the domain pointed to its address in August 2023 as a marketing tactic.

QWhat does Kris Marszalek claim the ai.com platform will allow users to do with AI Agents?

AKris Marszalek claims the ai.com platform will allow users to deploy their own AI Agents to perform tasks such as stock trading, automating workflows, and managing daily tasks like calendar scheduling, all with privacy and user control.

QBesides buying domains, what are some other ways mentioned in the article that crypto billionaires are pursuing mainstream integration?

AOther ways include Aave's founder buying a luxury mansion in London, Tether investing profits into various sectors like agriculture and sports, and Justin Sun purchasing hydroelectric power plants in Norway to secure energy resources for the AI era.

Related Reads

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit4m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit4m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit57m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片